Journal NaveWeiss's Journal: What frustrates me in slashdot's journals 8
Is how entries get archived. It's so limiting.. I always wish people could respond always to all of my journals. In other places they don't archive entries, and it's much better. The only thing that keeps me writing here is the population (in livejournal, there's no chance anybody would notice you unless you write in other's journals....)
Hmmmm (Score:1)
And you think that is somehow different here? No, it isn't. If you didn't write something in other journals regularly, nobody will befriend you and nobody will read your ramblings.
The archiving has its good points too: How would you like it that when somebody that truly hates you starts to flood all your old journal entries with goatse links (note: goatse.cx is down to my knowlegde, and I'm not going to
Re:Hmmmm (Score:2)
-MT.
Re:Hmmmm (Score:1)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:1)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:1)
And you think that is somehow different here? No, it isn't. If you didn't write something in other journals regularly, nobody will befriend you and nobody will read your ramblings.
Some people check this [slashdot.org] list. Really!
LJ has a similar thing but it updates so fast that I believe people are scared from it.
And the other thing: Archiving...... Well, in lj you can erase other's comments so it's not a problem. And still, sometimes I post a journal with an important question, and when someone wants to answe
Re:Hmmmm (Score:1)
Try to see slashdot less as a Blog, but more as a personal publishing space. A bit like your own magazine where you are your own editor, the comments are equivalent of readers lettres to the editor.
If you pick up a five month old magazine and you suddenly have a great critique on one of
Space (Score:2)
Re:Space (Score:1)
But it's true - archiving saves DB space. Even K5 began doing that to the dismay of some of its users (although they archive stories after much longer time). But archiving sucks and while it's acceptable for stories, it's not good for j