Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Science

Journal Surak's Journal: EXPERIMENT: Incidence of indigos in hackerdom? 88

Journal by Surak

I was reading this little bit on Indigo Children and the hairs stood up on the back of my neck. I was like, dude, this is my story. As was the case when I read bio after bio of adult indigos. Many of their stories sounded way similar to mine.

So I noticed that they had a section on indigo adults. After reading this profile on an adult indigo, I was completely stunned. I fit this profile basically to a "T". But I was still (and am still) somewhat skeptical of this whole indigo thing. Although, OTOH, somehow I feel that I definitely am an indigo.

So I took the auracolors test at auracolors.com and was, I guess, not completely surprised that the my primary life color was indigo. In fact, I am, according to the test, a full 12-point indigo.

Now I noticed in the descriptions that many indigos are misdiagnosed as ADD or ADHD or Asperger's Syndrome (AS). This is also common in hackerdom. To quote esr from the Jargon File:

...hackers tend to believe they have good reason for skepticism about clinical explanations of the hacker personality. That being said, most would also concede that some hacker traits coincide with indicators for non-hyperactive ADD and AS ... It is probably true that boosters of both would find a rather higher rate of clinical ADD among hackers than the supposedly mainstream-normal 3-5% (AS is rarer at 0.4-0.5%).

Some of the indigo traits also seem to correspond to common hacker traits, IMHO, such as a strong dislike of broken systems (i.e., political, legal, health, etc.), a strong resistance to authority, fear of Big Brother, frustration with political systems such as voting, anger at rights being taken away, etc.

So a little experiment in the name of metaphysical science here: I'd like to see how many of you geeks (and even non-geeks ;) out there that read my journal rate on the auracolors test, and, as importantly, after reading the descriptions I laid out, do you feel that you are an indigo? If you, as I do, are a bit skeptical of the metagifted site, you might also wanna check out a some other sites on indigo children via this google search.

So here's what I'm looking for: what you are the results of your auracolors test, and do you feel from reading the descriptions that you might be (or your child might be) an indigo?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EXPERIMENT: Incidence of indigos in hackerdom? More

EXPERIMENT: Incidence of indigos in hackerdom?

Comments Filter:
  • I'm *almost* an Indigo according to the test; I scored 10 on the Indigo scale, but I scored 11 on the Violet scale (and hence, apparently, I'm a Violet). I believe it's more due to the fact that I said I'm not androgynous in appearance; call it male self-ego, or a latent masculine residual self-image, but the answer to that question was a clear-cut no.

    But I emphathise with the Indigo experience completely. Even the part where Angels talk. Doesn't make me feel special or anything though; long figured there

    • I believe it's more due to the fact that I said I'm not androgynous in appearance; call it male self-ego, or a latent masculine residual self-image, but the answer to that question was a clear-cut no.

      Admittedly, this one's a bit of stretch for me. If I shave, and wear certain clothes, than I take on more of an androgynous appearance.

      I do have a lot of female friends and homosexual guys often think I might be homosexual or bisexual. Female friends also often think I'm bisexual. I don't have a problem w
  • I'm a Yellow - barely. I had an eight in the yellow category but 5-7 in all the other categories early in the test (red/oramge/magenta/tans). The crystal/violet/indigo were all at 2 or less.

    Sorry, but I don't identify with indigo at all.

    Just call me mellow yellow!

  • Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: You can type more than that for your comment.
  • but only by 1 point all other colors were within a few points of yellow except indigo wich was the lowest of my scores....hmm..
    but then My first thought when I read the title was the SGI Indigo2

  • I didn't score remarkably high in any one color. My highest score was for Environmental Tan, followed by Logical Tan. Quite low Indigo score, although a buddy of mine insists I have ADHD, if only because I am completely incapable of doing nothing as long as I'm awake.

  • My results are that I am a 9-point "Logical Tan."

    The Logical Tan has a light tan-colored band that encircles the body and is usually kept tightly drawn to it. This reflects the Logical Tans' tendency to keep their feelings and thoughts to themselves.

    Logical Tans are very logical and analytical. They choose to process every step, from one through ten. Logical Tans do not like to skip or miss anything. Their method of processing cannot be rushed. They need to analyze and comprehend the logic in each step b

  • kinda tan (Score:2, Informative)

    by dubiousdave ( 618128 )
    which is ironic for a geek sitting here bathed in the glow of my monitor.

    Red 3
    Orange 0
    Magenta 1
    Yellow 5
    Logical Tan 7
    Environmental Tan 4
    Sensitive Tan 7
    Abstract Tan 4
    Green 3
    Blue 5
    Violet 5
    Lavendar 2
    Crystal 5
    Indigo 4
    Red Overlay 0

    Maybe I'm just non-committal. I do tend to make a lot of savegames, just in case. Nah. Well...

    • Re:kinda tan (Score:2, Informative)

      by dubiousdave ( 618128 )

      The Sensitive Tan is the bridge between the mental colors and the emotional colors. Their auras are a combination of a light tan color with a light blue band next to it that encircles the body. Their personalities are a subtle combination of the mental Tan qualities and the emotional Blue qualities.

      Sensitive Tans incorporate the characteristics of mental, analytical logic with loving and intuitive compassion. These gentle personalities are quiet, sensitive and supportive. They prefer, like Logical Tans,

    • BTW, just in case my scores aren't lukewarm enough, I'm also a Libra.
  • I got a 10 in the Indigo portion... All the others were 6 or under...
    • Do you feel you fit the profile?
      • Most of the things in the adult profile seem to fit. I doubt that much of real import can be drawn from this though - like horoscopes, most of the information on that site was pretty broad and could fit a wide variety of people and some parts are almost contradictory:

        Prefer cooperative efforts, leadership positions, or working alone

        ie, Prefer working with others (cooperative efforts) or working alone?

        I don't think I'll be rushing out to throw my money at these guys. 8-/

  • How? (Score:2)

    by Tet ( 2721 ) *
    How on earth do any of you get a high Indigo score? I mean, from the descriptions in the links you gave, I should be an Indigo. But from the questions on the test, I'm definitely not. More tan for me:
    • Red - 6
    • Orange - 5
    • Magenta - 4
    • Yellow - 1
    • Logical Tan - 9
    • Environmental Tan - 10
    • Sensitive Tan - 5
    • Abstract Tan - 2
    • Green - 6
    • Blue - 0
    • Violet - 4
    • Lavender - 3
    • Crystal - 2
    • Indigo - 3
    • Red Overlay - 0

    But then, all this aura colour nonsense is bollocks anyway, so it's not really relevant. I'm an INTJ, if you're

  • Not that I put much weight in this type of crap, but any excuse not to do work is a good excuse :)

    #1 - RED: 7
    #2 - ORANGE: 4
    #3 - MAGENTA: 6
    #4 - YELLOW: 7
    #5 - Logical Tan: 8
    #6 - Environmental Tan: 7
    #7 - Sensitive Tan: 3
    #8 - Abstract Tan: 9
    #9 - GREEN: 3
    #10 - BLUE: 3
    #11 - VIOLET: 3
    #12 - LAVENDER: 2
    #13 - CRYSTAL: 0
    #14 - INDIGO: 2
    #15 - RED OVERLAY: 3

    As you can see, I'm either something or I'm not ... very little of that "in the middle crap."

    -Ab
  • There is something in geek culture that I call "X-men syndrome". Geeks have this idea that their knowledge of how to operate a computer makes them superior to the rest of the population, who perhaps lack this narrow, specialist knowledge. Forget that the rest of the population includes nuclear physicists and brain surgeons, geeks think themselves superior to everyone. Yet, geeks do not get the respect that they think they deserve, which of course is because most of them are nowhere near as smart as they thi
    • Sure, sure, sure. Take the test! :) Post your results! :) I'm trying to get as many people in the sample as possible. This is in the name of science! :-D

      This indigo thing has nothing to do with a superiority/inferiority/X-Men complex thingie at all, really. This is all for legitimate research I'm doing in metaphysical studies.
      • This is all for legitimate research I'm doing in metaphysical studies.

        Err, aren't "legitimate research" and "metaphysics" diametrically opposed? I'd class metaphysics in the same moldy bin as parapsychology, ESP, UFOs, crop circles, cold fusion, and any soul in the Republican Party -- they're all hoaxes passed off on an uncritical public :)

        • Err, aren't "legitimate research" and "metaphysics" diametrically opposed? I'd class metaphysics in the same moldy bin as parapsychology, ESP, UFOs, crop circles, cold fusion, and any soul in the Republican Party -- they're all hoaxes passed off on an uncritical public :)

          Socrates didn't think so. Neither did many of the other great thinkers and writers throughout time.

          Besides, for you to say that implies that you don't know what metaphysics is.

          • Many of the ancient Greeks said things that took a long time to discredit (heavy things fall more quickly than light things, the world is flat, etc.). That didn't make those assertions right though. The only verification that these assertions were or were not true came via rigorous testing -- an idea that most of the ancient Greeks seemed never to consider. Their loss.

            Calling on ancient authority as "irrefutable" proof of a position is a classic logical fallacy, and in fact is a big part of why it took 200

            • I know enough about metaphysics to know that it's anti-scientific pseudoscience, and so I don't really have time for that kind of nonsense.

              Not everything that isn't scientific is nonsense.

              The easiest example of this is the ability of intelligent people to defy statistics.

              Science is a body of knowledge that had been rigoursly tested and found to be very very close to reality. But that's all it is--there are things that science can't, and often shouldn't, touch.

              'course, I also believe that the principle

              • The easiest example of this is the ability of intelligent people to defy statistics.

                Then you misunderstand statistics. Statistics are a technique for summarizing, to a certain known degree of confidence, what is observed in a population. That confidence aspect is critical: statistics absolutely tolerates anomalies, always.

                That's why statistics has confidence intervals and other fudge factors -- the most that can ever be said of any statistics based assertion is that we are "N percent confident that X pe

                • However, the sheer quantity of things that can be explored on properly scientific terms so vastly overwhelms the range of things that fall outside of scientific rigor, that personally I just don't see the point in wasting time with such matters.

                  Well, a significant portion of such matters is central to human thought. "Why does my life love me?" "Am I more than my genetics?" "Is there a God?" All questions that science isn't setup to answer, and shouldn't be looked to for anything more than a cynical, ag
                  • Oh, I agree. Extraordinary claims like "there is no God" should require extraordinary evidence. Without such, the proper scientific answer should be "I don't know." ;)

                    To be fair, that *is* mainstream science's answer. That which is not proven and which is not disproven is unknown. The problem with science is that since it can't easily answer questions about that which is unknown, it chooses not to even try.

                    I didn't understand programming languages when I first starting learning to program. It took me
            • How about the Crookes Radiometer [howstuffworks.com] experiment? Get yourself one of these. You find them in science stores (I think I've seen them at the Discover Channel store) or children's toy stores.

              Get one and a flashlight. Setup the radiometer and the flashlight so the vanes on the the radiometer turn very slowly. Point at the radiometer with your fingers, and you can *will* the radiometer to speed up or slow down. Try it. It works.

              This is actual, measurable evidence of psychic ability. You can SEE this happen

              • I don't think that experiment proves you have psychic ability. The radiometer measures electromagnetic radiation (light waves, radio waves, etc), correct?

                Well, your brain and nervous system transmit electrical (or at least charged particle) signals to each other, and modulation of electrical current will create electromagnetic waves. This is how a radio works, it modulates an electrical current on a wire (the antenna). Your will changing the speed of the thing is probably just you creating more powerful s

            • Modern science teaches that it's much more important to call on measurable, observable reality, and to rigorously test our beliefs about this reality with repeatable, quantifiable tests that confirm or refute our beliefs.

              The problem with metaphysics is that it doesn't lend itself to such testing -- it's all subjective, unmeasurable, open to interpreation, and rarely if ever makes testable assertions.

              The problem with people today is that they have too much faith in science. It's called the naive-realist

            • If any of these "great thinkers" could come up with a defense of metaphysics (or ESP, etc) that wasn't in violent opposition to the scientific method, I'd be happy to look into it. But that never seems to happen -- it's all just mystical shit.

              Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena: to any future metaphysics provides a foundation for metaphysics which isn't in "violent opposition" to the scientific method. Read it through, you'll not find any "mystical shit". It's diametrically opposed to "mystical shit".

              That said,
    • There is the same syndrome to some extent in any specialized occupation. We had a nuclear physist PHd talk to our Computer Engineering Club back in College and he DEFINITELY thought he was superior to "computer people"(strangely enough while advocating computers as tools for modeling Physics). Neurosurgeons and Medical specialists feel/act the same way in there circles as well.
    • Works both ways, methinks.

      Doing a class on cybercrime this sem (taught by some lecturer from the #@$!$ ARTS fac... was hoping for some legal, and policy perspective, and I get this), and I keep hearing folks like Kevin Mitnick, and that school-kid who "improved" on the Blaster worm, being called as "computer geniuses". Pisses me off no end; I suppose it is a variant of that old "Be scared of those that are different" phenomenon.

      I suppose this will reduce in the coming months, now the boom is out of the in

    • You'll find that in any specialized application.

      Plus a lot of geeks do things like man a help-desk (or field calls in a similar manner), and being on that side of the service industry will turn you into an elitist pretty quick.

      I mean, it's not like computers aren't something workers deal with every day, they should learn at least a little about them. I know how to change the oil on my car and diagnose basic problems, but I still defer to a mechanic.

      It's very much a human thing and not a geek thing.
    • they never bothered (because why should superior people bother) to learn to interact socially with non-geeks.
      Don't you think you are generalizing a bit? 95% of the people I socialize with are non-geeks. Whenever one of my coworkers apologizes for doing something wrong on the PC, I always tell them it's ok, if they were as good on a computer as I was, I'd be out of a job. For the most part, I agree with you though. Many geeks do have delusions of grandeur.
  • I took the test, even though I don't buy into any of it.

    Anyhow, I'm an 11 point "Sensitive Tan", and high on the other tans, and low on pretty much everything else.

    And I *will* break your neck if you say I have a red overlay (Oh, I don't, by the way).
    • Interesting.

      So far most it seems that most hackers are high on the tan categories. Still, I'd like to see more responses.

      Three out of -- I think -- 15 responses so far have high indigo factors, about 20%. Although 15 can hardly be considered a representative sampling. I'd like a bit more. Is 100 responses asking too much?

      • Is 100 responses asking too much?

        It's a lot of questions, so I don't know how many people are going to be willing to spend the time. You might have to settle for a "wildly innaccurate" sampling. Maybe none of the indigos are pre-disposded to taking the test, and the Tans are overly disposed to test taking, skewing your results...
      • I sure hope you don't count me in the "hacker" crowd, 'cause I'm definitely not. Just a wanna-be geek, ya know?

        I think tans lend themselves well to being engineering types, because they have to be methodical and detail-oriented, and good systems thinkers.

        As for being a Vulcan, Dave, if you're reading this far -- two words, baby: pon far. :-)

        ....Bethanie....
  • Everybody wants to be special. *sigh* all right, i will go and take the test. And i will come back. And i suspect that you will find something out in your study of people by colour: statements are general, and people are different. I think that blind tests could probably show this to be a crock, but i'll play along. (for example, with astrology, where professionals were asked to match the full chart with questionnaires that had didn't have the birth dates but were all from a specific age range that was stat
    • All right. In order, My results:

      Violet and Blue: 12

      Green: 11

      Indigo: 10

      Logical tan: 9

      Environmental tan: 8

      Abstract and Sensitive tan: 7

      Crystal: 5

      Yellow, (i hate yellow with fervent passion) and "Red Overlay": 4

      Red: 2

      Orange and Magenta:1

      So what do we get out of that? *sigh* that a lot of the questions overlap, and that i like to be in charge but don't always know what to do at a party.

      oke, i'm taking my sceptical, cantankerous self back to the benches. But at least i went through with it, and

  • 12 - Green
    9 - Blue
    9 - Violet
    7 - Logical Tan
    7 - Yellow
    6 - Sensitive Tan
    5 - Indigo
    5 - Enviromental Tan (Does this make me a hippy?)
    4 - Abstract Tan
    4 - Crystal
    3 - Lavendar
    2 - Red
    1 - Red Overlay (Cause I almost died when young)
    0 - Orange
    0 - Magenta
  • Most of the stuff listed would apply to me (and any kid who was smarter than the teachers). It's like with any statistic, you can make it mean whatever you want. As for "seeing" spiritual things, I think I've mentioned "seeing" a demon before. If you want I will search for it or write a new JE.
  • Red: 2
    Orange: 4
    Magenta: 7
    Yellow: 7
    Logical Tan: 5
    Environmental Tan: 8
    Sensitive Tan: 6
    Abstract Tan: 7
    Green: 4
    Blue: 5
    Violet: 9
    Lavender: 3
    Crystal: 6
    Indigo: 10
    Red Overlay: 1
    • Surak, that's creepy btw. I'm an indigo alright, but I'm out of balance. Any pointers?

      • Surak, that's creepy btw. I'm an indigo alright, but I'm out of balance. Any pointers?

        I dunno. I'm just learning about this myself. This experiment is one thing I'm doing in the process of learning.

        You are number 5, out of the ... I dunno...somewhere in the neighborhood of 16 or something responses I've seen. The results are now officially higher than the average reported thus far, but 16 or 17 responses is hardly a representative sample.

        I'm still somewhat skeptical of the whole indigo thing. But we

  • Let me state up front that about a third of the way through this test, I personally decided that it was useless; mainly because a) the way the questions are phrased, and b) the fact that it separates everything into discrete variables.

    That having been said:
    Red: 2
    Orange: 3
    Magenta: 4
    Yellow: 4
    Logical Tan: 6
    Environmental Tan: 6
    Sensitive Tan: 0
    Abstract Tan: 3
    Green: 5
    Blue: 3
    Violet: 3
    Lavender: 1
    Crystal: 2
    Indigo: 3
    Red Overlay: 2

    FYI, I'm a hardcore INTP (and I tend to prefer the MB type testing as

  • Yeah. Well, I took it last night (from Sol's reference).

    I only scored a two on the indigo section; I had 10 on logical tan and 9 on environmental tan. It would have been fairly easy to game the whole thing, though, if one wanted to.

    It's worth noting that tests like this measure what you think of yourself, not what you are. For some, this is pretty close. For others, very far off. :-)
  • I tried to avoid it, as I find it more than a bit of hooey. As others have stated, it all seems rather pseudo-scientific (of course, I feel similarly about the MB tests:)

    But in the interest of creating more data:

    logical tan: 8
    environmental and abstract tan: 6 (note, the abstract tan seems to describe me best)
    orange: 5
    yellow: 4
    violet: 3
    indigo and red: 2
    all others: 1

    With a big fat '4' on the red overlay. Perhaps if my parents had abused me, it would be a 6:)
  • Red 6
    Orange 2
    Magenta 3
    Yellow 8
    Log Tan 9
    Env Tan 9
    Sen Tan 6
    Abs Tan 1
    Green 9
    Blue 3
    Violet 6
    Lavendar 1
    Crystal 1
    Indigo 1
    Red OL 2

    So I'm what; Burnt Sienna?
  • 9 points for environmental, 7 for logical.

    Moving on down the list:
    5 pt. Red
    4 pt. Sensitive Tan, Green, and Indigo
    2 pt. Orange, Violet, Red Overlay
    1 pt. Magenta and Crystal
  • Logical Tan - 8
    Environmental Tan - 7
    The rest were 3's or less...
  • red 6
    orange 8
    magenta 4
    yellow 11
    tan 8
    env tan 11
    sense tan 4
    abstract tan 5
    green 12
    blue 4
    violet 9
    lavender 3
    crystal 4
    indigo 4
    red overlay 3

    this aura and healing powers bullshit reminds me of my crazy ex stempmom. she thought she could teleport and read minds.

  • nope (Score:2)

    by Servo ( 9177 )
    I was primarily a red. Incidently, that is my "birth color" in feng shui, and has always been my favorite color.


  • I got 8 points in both Yellow and Green -- what does that make me, Kiwi?

    It's a weird combination, but the description is pretty spot on for me.
  • Here are my top 5:

    Green -11
    Violet - 11
    Yellow - 9
    Blue - 8
    Environmental Tan- 8

  • So I am (in descending Order):

    Yellow: 8
    Violet: 7
    Blue: 7
    Crustal 5
    Abstract Tan: 5
    Indigo: 4
    Green: 2
    Environmental Tan: 2
    Logical Tan: 2
    Oarnge: 2
    Sensitive Tan: 1
    Magenta: 1
    Red: 1
    Lavender: 0

    Red Overlay: 1

    (Now i hope someone with far too much free time is going to compile all of these into a pretty graph, etc?)
  • Here are my scores:
    Red = 0
    Orange = 2
    Magenta = 4
    YELLOW = 10
    Logical Tan = 6
    Environmental Tan = 5
    Sensitive Tan = 3
    Abstract Tan = 2
    Green = 5
    Blue = 3
    Violet = 6
    Lavender = 3
    Crystal = 3
    Indigo = 6
    Red Overlay = 3

    The Red Overlay thing kinda bugs me...makes me want go out and beat somebody up ;)

  • Red: 3
    Orange: 4
    Magenta: 4
    Yellow: 5
    Logical: 10
    Environ: 11
    Sensitive: 4
    Abstract: 3
    Green: 3
    Blue: 2
    Violet: 6
    Lavender: 5
    Crystal: 3
    Indigo: 4
    Red Over: 1

  • Apparently, and frankly not really surprisingly, I am a full fledged 12 points Lavender type with a serious red overlay. Closely followed with environmental tan (11), logical tan (10) and blue (9).. then a range of colors that score 8, abstract at 7, crystal at 6, and green and red close the hatch at 5.

    I must say that som questions were not allways put in the same way, and thus not allways answered in the same way. Still, I consider myself quite skilled in coding/hacking, but no indigo here, mate..

  • To punish the great and evil Surak for convincing others to beg people into taking this test, I will add to the noise. ;-)

    Red: 2, Orange: 2
    Magenta: 3, Yellow: 2
    Logical tan: 4, Environmental tan: 2
    Sensitive tan: 2, Abstract tan: 2
    Green: 4, Blue: 2
    Violet: 7, Lavender: 4
    Crystal: 5, Indigo: 7
    Red overlay: 3

  • red: 3
    orange: 4
    magenta: 2
    yellow: 5
    logical tan: 10
    environmental tan: 11
    sensitive tan: 7
    abstract tan: 6
    green: 8
    blue: 6
    violet: 6
    lavender: 3
    crystal: 10
    indigo: 4
    red overlay: 2

    I'm obviously an environmental tan, a logical tan, and a crystal. I'd have preferred if they had mixed the questions up, and scored them afterwards, making it less clear which traits went with which 'aura'.

    My aunt believes that I have an aura, because she saw it when I came to visit her after her hysterectomy.

    I believe somewhat that we a
  • #1 - RED :4
    #2 - ORANGE : 1
    #3 - MAGENTA: 3
    #4 - YELLOW : 7
    #5 - Logical Tan :5
    #6 - Environmental Tan : 6
    #7 - Sensitive Tan :6
    #8 - Abstract Tan :7
    #9 - GREEN: 9
    #10 - BLUE : 2
    #11 - VIOLET : 9
    #12 - LAVENDER:0
    #13 - CRYSTAL: 1
    #14 - INDIGO : 1
    #15 - RED OVERLAY : 1

    Bah... Loved the 'I tend to take a long time to make a decision. (Take as long as you want to answer this question.)' one.
  • Red: 4
    Orange: 5
    Magenta: 2
    Yellow: 6
    Logical Tan: 11
    Env. Tan: 9
    Sensitive Tan: 6
    Abstract Tan: 1
    Green: 5
    Blue: 5
    Violet: 5
    Lavender: 2
    Crystal: 7
    Indigo: 1
    Red Overlay: 2

    Lessons learned: <strong bad>Holy Crap!</strong bad> That was a lot of questions! Was it just me or did several different sections have the same question? I swear the one about what kind of work environment you want was on there at least twice....

    So from these results we know that Jason has no chance of being famous due to his inate a
  • environmental tan 9
    logical tan 9
    green 6
    sensitive tan 5
    crystal 5
    violet 5
    lavender 4
    yellow 4
    orange 3
    abstract tan 2
    indigo 2
    red 2
    blue 1
    magenta 1
    red overlay 0
  • Anybody who feels the need to name things after their own personal preconcieved notions of what a "color" "means" needs some help.

    That said;

    Red: 4 Orange: 4 Magenta (heh, the goth/raver color. . . .): 3 LogTan: 7 EnviroTan: 9 SensitiveTan: 9 AbstractTan: 10 Green: 11 Blue: 10 Violet: 12 Lavender: 11 Crystal: 9 Indigo: 9 Red Overlay: 4

    So I am an EnviroSensiAbstract-Tan-Green-Blue-Violet-Lavende r person with a red hue? *rolls eyes*

    AND NOW FOR THE RANT

    Also, these types of quanitiz
  • w/hints of environmental tan and yellow.

    And I prefer a divining rod made of birch. You?

  • red 3, orange 3, magenta 5, yellow 6, logical tan 0, environmental tan 2, sensitive tan 3, abstract tan 9, green 4, blue 10, violet 3, lavender 11, crystal 9, indigo 7, red overlay 5.

    turns out that i'm lavender. i bloody hate that color, so i think i'll call this category black instead (because it means having a very hard life in this world). indigo is somewhere in the middle of the list, but then again, i'm not a hacker either. not that i'd believe in this indigo-hacker connection -- i'd connect it more w

    • OK, I wasn't totally awake yet when I posted that thing (08:57 AM). Now, after 0.5l of green tea, it seems like the stream-of-conciousness posting method wasn't exactly the right choice. So I'll try to do better now. Share and enjoy!

      <fake rasta>Yay, groovy, me be lavender with a red overlay, Mon! That be an ugly color, Mon, so methinks me shoulda call datta black instead, sound much more bettah, speak much more bouta greef'n'sorrow methinks me having coming. Black have the blues lavender donnave. Me

  • me (Score:1)

    by subgeek ( 263292 )
    red 4
    orange 4
    magenta 3
    yellow 7
    logical tan 8
    environmental tan 6
    sensitive tan 6
    abstract tan 4
    green 6
    blue 8
    violet 9
    lavender 4
    crystal 5
    indigo 7
    red overlay 1

    whatever that means. people often percieve themselves differently than they are.
  • I'm an electrical engineer not a hacker.

    I'm also 7's on Logical Tan, Environmental Tan, & Green. Indigo was but a 5.
  • I don't feel like any particular color, and my test results reflected that.
  • Throw this on the fire:

    Violet 10, Indigo/Yellow 9, Enviro. Tan 8, Crystal/Magenta/Log. Tan 7, Abst. Tan 5, Red/Orange/Sen. Tan 4, Green 3, Lav/Blue 0, and an ever so exciting Red Overlay of 1.

    Do I get a cookie?
  • Actually, I'm a crystal, coming in at 8.

    Violet and enrivonmental tan are next at 6.

    Indigo was my absolute lowest score of all the colors, being a 2 :-p

    Well, Red Overlay was a 1, but that doesn't count...

Slashdot Top Deals

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Close