Journal Chacham's Journal: Rant: illegitimate TLDs, and destroying .gov 2
This doesn't have to make sense. It is my reaction. Analyzing reactions can be a good thing.
When i see "news.com.com" it irks me some. It's somewhat incorrect. But, there's probably a good reason for it.
However, when i see
Then again it also bothers me to see "archives.gov", it is supposed to be thomas.loc.gov. It's the thomas section of the library of congress that has them. And "time.gov" is also wrong, it's tycho.usno.navy.mil. That is where it should be, since that is the department that handles it.
Perhaps it wouldn't bother me as much if there was a "www.gov". Set up for all the links to the more complicated URLs.
I think it's about time to reboot the Internet.
i'm probably wrong (Score:1)
in my opinion, if a company wants to register more than one domain for the same site, go ahead and let them.
news.com.com is different. that's just silly.
Truly Illigitimate vs Uncommon (Score:3, Interesting)
In my dealings with spyware, I have had to deal with many problematic software which adds a whole host of "new" tld's by interfacing with the computers name resolver. Such extensions are usually stuff like
At one point in the history of the net there was a service called AlterNIC that came out with a bunch of new DNS services and a lot of even the very large ISP's got on board to support AlterNIC resolution. This service was started shortly after Network Solutions began charging $100 for domain registrations (previously they were free). I really belive that if AlterNIC had succeeded, we'd have had far fewer problems with domain squatting, misleading domains, etc. than we have had in the past and continue to have today.
Also, an interesting aside is how some countries have already been running their own alternative TLD registry to support domains in a native character set (Or UTF-8/Unicode) which was previously (and to a large degree still is) unsupported by the regular root servers.
~GoRK