Journal fustakrakich's Journal: Rock, Paper, Scissors 44
But not against the overwhelming hysteria. This is nuttier than the 50s. It's the "New and Improved" Birtherism! Now all white and shiny!
And as sure as the sun rises, I was reminded once again today to stop telling people to clean their own damn House. Eh, maybe I will, maybe I won't
Oh, and get the fuck out of Syria, and Afghanistan, and Niger, and...
How sad that nobody gives a shit about the wars anymore..
Someone has to go to jail. (Score:2)
The people pushing this crap need to go to jail.
There have been ethical violations and I'm sure that some of it can have a criminal judgment put to it.
Someone has to go to jail at this point.
Either Trump's people or Hillary's people. Someone broke the law here and the axe should fall upon the guilty.
Re: (Score:1)
:-) I believe you replied to the wrong person (if not, feel free to ignore)... But we always value your opinion more than your downmods(which are for disagreements, and maybe style), even when it is bullshit, in fact more so for its visibility. And I'm sorry that you find simple observations of the obvious so offensive. Many people do because it seems to reflect very badly, so I do understand when they lash out instead of looking in.
Re: (Score:1)
i don't give a shit about what you have to say in this discussion, frankly.
Oh, well, that's nice [blogspot.mx]... You make sure to come back now, I take real good to your kind
Re: (Score:1)
And since you offered your unsolicited (but not unwanted) opinion to us here. I shall offer one in kind. Surprisingly, it's on topic. He is right about the Russia shtick. Without real admissible evidence, it is still tabloid speculation, and people are being modded down for pointing at the naked emperor. We all knew that the losing side of the election would blame the Russians. The GOP was all up and down about it during the summer of '16. So all we have is simple role reversal because of the major "upset"
Re: (Score:2)
That's a fair point however, consider that the people I'm commenting to are themselves frequently much larger assholes. Thus on some metric of assholery, I think you'll find I'm by far the lesser evil.
To downvote the guy putting down people that are themselves being bigger assholes by spreading lies, spreading misinformation, rendering discussions impossible, running their mouth and refusing to do any research...
What you're doing is validating their behavior and suggesting that my rightous actions against t
Re: (Score:2)
Failure to answer my challenge or show an example of my own bad behavior argues that your position might be even weaker... you might only have hearsay.
I've made it very clear that I'm happy to defend my behavior. You're arguing that you don't have to argue your case which is irrational.
Please cite an example so we can go through a process to evaluate the validity of your position. Failure to do so will not reflect well on the integrity of your argument.
You are attempting to reverse the burden of proof despi
Re: (Score:2)
Your first example:
Bobrick said:
""No evidence? Are you fucking serious?""
You then claim I am being an asshole when I respond with this:
""Are you serious? Cite it.
No seriously. Cite it now or you will be conceding the point. If it is so obvious... cite it. Evidence. Cite it.""
This is obviously not me being an asshole and you suggesting that is frankly laughable. He disparaged ME, I then asked him to justify his position, and he pussed out and ran away which is pretty typical.
You citing an example of someone
Re: (Score:2)
No, I invalidated your argument. I showed you had no case by going through you links and quoted what was said in them.
I then pointed out why given what was said your argument made no sense.
I proved you wrong.
For you to call me a troll when I went through your quotes and proved you wrong... You're lying.
That's all you did there. You lied.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll quote it. Why don't you go through my argument and tell me why I'm wrong instead of running your suck?
No no. Actually try to make that argument going through my response. Demonstrate you even read what I said. Because I don't think you did. I think you are just salty I called YOU on your bullshit. And like those other degenerates, instead conceding you fucked up... you're lying.
You've got two options here.
You can either go through my argument and look like a retard when your position doesn't make any s
Re: (Score:2)
I refuted your argument. You have not shown where anything I said was wrong with any specificity.
Re: (Score:2)
Saying you're right while not citing what you said that was right only proves what I said.
I cited what you said and then went through the examples to show that they were wrong.
Your response is to say that is wrong but not say why or not show why.
I went through every specific example and explained them. Please go through my points just like I did and show how what I said was worse than whatever was said to me.
If someone says something douchy to me, and I respond by calling them a douche...that is justified.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually you gave self defeating examples.
It would be like someone saying the moon was made of cheese. Then when someone says "show me the moon cheese" you bring back "totally non-cheese moon rocks"... and then when I point out those are not actually cheese... You say you already provided evidence of moon cheese.
No. You did not. You offered examples where someone ELSE was being a douche, my responses were mostly a challenge to them and not really personal attacks. And from this you presume to declare victor
Re: (Score:2)
Let us see if you actually saved your sad sack argument by going through the self defeating evidence you posted earlier... Nope.
Concession on your part stands. As to complaining about being down modded... the mod points don't mean anything if its just morons crying when anyone notices they're stupid.
If this is what down modded has come to mean... ideally we should all have the worst mod points possible because that would apparently signal the maximum level of retard rage directed at us.
I know I know... You
Re: (Score:2)
You can reply to my rebuttal or you are conceding.
""
I'll quote it. Why don't you go through my argument and tell me why I'm wrong instead of running your suck?
No no. Actually try to make that argument going through my response. Demonstrate you even read what I said. Because I don't think you did. I think you are just salty I called YOU on your bullshit. And like those other degenerates, instead conceding you fucked up... you're lying.
You've got two options here.
You can either go through my argument and look
Re: (Score:2)
I went through the AC's argument that he was too cowardly to use an anon screen name to stand behind... Like you... and I showed that the examples were an absurd justification for his opinion.
Frankly, all you're doing is hypocritically throwing eggs at people that have some level of identification on this server. You know how I can go through your posts and show that thing I disagreed with in another thread?
No I can't. Because you are going out of your way to make it impossible for anyone to tell who are yo
Re: (Score:2)
As to me failing to shred your bad argument, I obviously did that.
What is going on is that after getting rhetorically roundhouse kicked in the face, you defaulted to childishly refusing to concede a lost argument.
Look, if you're right then go through my THRICE reposted argument with quotations and point by point break down... and challenge it.
You've refused to do that. You threw out a bad argument, gave evidence that frankly argued against your bad position... and then refused to even deal with it.
You say y
Re: (Score:2)
Point 3 wasn't whining but rather an examine of cited evidence where in it was demonstrated that the cited evidence did not support the proposed argument.
This was made clear. Failing to acknowledge or even deal with this doesn't reinforce your argument but rather undermines your own credibility. This process of credibility sabotage on your own part has been so consistent throughout this conversation that it is now well past bankrupt.
In good conscience you can't be taken seriously. You're clearly biased, irr
Re: (Score:2)
I'm just commenting, brah. I don't care who sees it.
Re: (Score:2)
Why not?
Every so often someone has something worth listening to or has an insight or corrects me when I make a mistake. Sometimes people say "thank you for making that point." or something.
But the price to be paid for that is occasionally idiots respond. And that's fine. Worst case they are a little annoying and not very interesting. But even then it isn't a problem because I can have fun with them anyway.
So its all good.
Re: (Score:1)
There is no need to lock up people who aren't dangerous. Taking away their power and turning your back would be sufficient to avoid future problems. In November we will find out what people want, not that we don't know already. This is the never ending story, where people do the same old bullshit with the same bad actors, expecting something different this time for sure.
Re: (Score:2)
I think they do have to go to jail. It creates a political consequence and fatality convictions will preclude many of these people from having any further role in anything in the government.
If Trump violated the law and did some collusion with the russians which seems extremely unlikely... then he should go to jail.
If it was the Hillary people and corrupt government officials creating a story out of nothing to bias an election... they should go to jail.
This has gone on too far. This has had international re
Re: (Score:1)
Drunk driving is actually dangerous. So are stupid people that believe lies. The liar is a snake whose power comes from the audience, not the lie. Even the bible clearly states where sin originated. It wasn't the temptation. It was the failure to resist. It is the rewards of lying that make it so pervasive in this business. It's quite the paradox that people choose to believe the lie and punish the liar, but I do understand the primitive emotional, sexual appeal.
Re: (Score:2)
It isn't only lies... it is also what happened at the FBI, the State Department, the Justice Department... either they were right and Trump is a Russian agent... Or they're guilty of violating oaths, subversion of justice, lots of fraud, failure to disclose conflicts of interest... A book of violations can be thrown at them already.
It is why we're seeing FBI personnel resign or be fired. They're getting caught. And not only are they not going to jail, they're getting their pensions.
If you violate your oaths
Re: (Score:1)
We have to vote in a congress that will prosecute the lawbreakers. It just won't happen with the present bunch. They cannot touch each other. There's enough blackmail amongst them to take out the whole lot. We have to complete the first step first.