Journal Captain Splendid's Journal: Whoopsie 23
Trump Picks Foreclosure King Mnuchin for Treasury Secretary
So much for the swamp, I guess.
Trump Picks Foreclosure King Mnuchin for Treasury Secretary
So much for the swamp, I guess.
The shortest distance between two points is under construction. -- Noelie Alito
Doubling down on the swamp (Score:1)
He was always pro-swamp
Another one to add to the list (Score:2)
T
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You do have a point, though - he hasn't put many people in his cabinet yet that GWB wouldn't have selected. Now whether or not Cruz would have selected them is a different matter...
Re: (Score:2)
Nah. Every single GOP Senator could go out and shoot a random person in the face on live TV and 2018 would still work in their favour, the map is that bad.
Re: (Score:2)
Same goes for the democratic machine candidates (except for Clinton, hee hee, but she would still win her senate seat back without really trying). Where's the beef? This is just more of your own partisan whining. GOP, pfft, at least they show some balls, even if they are brass... Fucking democrats are so flaccid, the voters, that is. The party is still stringing them along despite it all.
Re: (Score:2)
Same what? What are you talking about?
This is just more of your own partisan whining.
Me noting the fact that 2018 is an uphill battle for Dems to recapture the Senate is partisan and whining how? Your ability to make hay form thin air is astounding.
Re: (Score:1)
Every single GOP Senator could go out and shoot a random person in the face on live TV and 2018 would still work in their favour...
That same what. Still trying to play your little games with me, eh? It ain't working...
Me noting the fact that 2018 is an uphill battle for Dems to recapture the Senate is partisan and whining how?
Fuck the democrats. I don't want them to regain anything. That's the problem. That's your partisan whining. It's more of the same back and forth. We need to replace the republicans w
Re: (Score:2)
Then you misunderstood. That comment has to do with the fact that the majority of Senate seats up for reelection in 2018 are in deep red states. This is a math problem, not another notch in your "both sides are hoooooorrible" lament.
Still trying to play your little games with me, eh?
TIL trying to clarify your shitty use of language = "playing a game". Fucking delusional.
Fuck the democrats.
We know.
I don't want them to regain anything.
We know.
That's your partisa
Re: (Score:1)
The world has moved on.
No it hasn't. The Clinton people are on the warpath more than ever [politico.com]... Bunch of screwballs. Keep trying to deny that you are just whining.
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, you really do love making mountains out of molehills.
Keep trying to deny that you are just whining.
I'm not denying it. I'm asking you for proof to support your bizarre claims. Which you can't do. Thanks for playing!
Re: (Score:1)
Read your posts. What more proof do you need?
Re: (Score:2)
You don't bother to read them, so why should I?
Re: (Score:1)
No, I read them. You are quite clear. You are more revealing than more than you want to admit.
Re: (Score:2)
LOL. Thanks for that laugh.
You are quite clear.
Except to you, apparently.
You are more revealing than more than you want to admit.
Ahhh, still got nothing, eh? Fucking chump.
Re: (Score:1)
Dude, admit it, you're just an apologist. So revoltingly *middle of the road*. So typically democrat, totally dependent on the other faction's fuck ups to make yourselves look good. You are putting lipstick on a pig, polishing a turd, pounding your pud...
Re: (Score:2)
Man, it's kind of sad that you're reduced to begging me to make your argument for you. Stop being lazy and go find me some evidence.
So revoltingly *middle of the road*.
Yes, well, from your perspective in the hinterlands, that is what it looks like. I suggest you invest in a telescope. It makes it easier to discern the details in things that are far away from you.
So typically democrat,
That's not what we call the liberal party here in Canada, if
Re: (Score:1)
That's not what we call the liberal party here in Canada
Yeah, real liberals should sue over the trademark violation.
Ah details... So obsessed, you don't see the forest. From inside the plane, you can't see the tail is on fire...
And of course you would also be obsessed with style. That certainly explains much of your shtick...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Laugh it up, monkey boy. You reflect no ideology except that of appeasement. You are more 'establishment' that you will ever know, or accept when revealed to you. In other words a weaselly centrist, safely staying in the middle of the herd.
you're still a capitalist
Exactly how is that supposed to be offensive? I'm not sure what you mean by that. Is it some kind Trump angst thing? Care to explain, or are you just going to say I'm too dumb to understand? Let's see what you got there, if anything at all....
I me
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, my bad. I wrote that before I learned you're part of the silent majority.
Congrats on your long con, BTW. I can only imagine the patience it took you to keep it up. You can collect your scalp and fuck off back to Breitbart now.
Phew, glad that's over!
Re: (Score:1)
Phew, glad that's over!
Me too!
Re: (Score:1)
But weren't the broken promises part of what led to President Lawnchair having a democratic majority for only a vanishingly short period of time?
Yes, and it also helped to defeat Bush the 1st. We all know that neither democrats or republicans will keep their promises, and what, you expect people to vote for democrats again? Fuck that. You're only discouraging people from voting at all. I am left wondering why you people keep voting for either one and insisting that alternatives are not viable. It can only b