Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Does Cheney Do It? More

How Does Cheney Do It?

Comments Filter:

  • The ones you provide show more a biased opinion than fact. You need hard evidence that nobody can deny, least of all the IRS.

    Regardless... Happy hunting. Let's hope you can do better than the OJ prosecutors.

    • People can deny anything.

      • Believe me, I've noticed!

        • So, why do you deny Him, then?

          • Insufficient data. Why do you insist that I conform?

            • I'm not the one issuing labels such as "bigot" to the one in non-conformance with contemporary falsehoods.

              • The label applies to anybody that opposes equal rights for everybody. It's so extremely simple. This is what makes your denials so fun to watch.

                • We've already covered the falsehood of your attempt to claim "equality" in this case. Your need to ride this claim has the validity of a fish in the Tour de France. Yet peddle it you do.

                  • Well, it is because you continue to be so obtuse that we need a strong government to simply put an end to it and tell you that you shall respect the rights of others. Thankfully you will be outnumbered on the matter and we can just ignore your derp, and you can go cry about your demographic cratering...

                    • you shall respect the rights of others

                      For the bazillionth time, as a veteran, I support and defend the right of godless Commie sodomites to do all of the atheistic, Marxist feces-wallowing that their abused equipment can sustain. I support the rule of law and their right to slap whatever legal labels they care on their activities. I even--get this--support your bigoted right to label me as falsely as you care to.
                      Aside: "Lord, have mercy on f-bomb, and grant him compassion and understanding for those who, out of respect for Your truth, cannot a

                    • Yes, you defend some rights for some groups, and not even individuals. You post opposition to equal rights to a contract. You oppose women's rights to make their own choices for their own bodies. To shed the bigotry tag, you must defend the same rights to everybody, and it washes away by itself, otherwise the stain remains indelible.

                      Demographic cratering is a term you created many journals ago, I'm just pointing your own irrational fears back at ya.

                    • I'm just laughing at how your concept of equality doesn't seem to include an equal right to disagree. You're preaching an arbitrary, fanatic orthodoxy. I can only hope you're fully aware of how creepy it looks and are doing it for effect. Because you start with lies about when life begins, anatomical purpose, and, ultimately, the purpose of life, and then it all goes to Hell from there.

                      the stain remains indelible

                      Hey, if I'm stained with Truth, it's a badge of honor, sir.

                      your own irrational fears back at ya

                      Uh, file that noise under "whatevs".
                      Are you done being silly ye

                    • I already said you can disagree all you want, you just can't have your Jim Crow laws.

                    • You're denying me some non-existent laws in which I never had interest? For what unstated purpose?

                    • DOMA is a fine example. Your posts indicate a certain proclivity for keeping such laws on the books, despite the obvious bigotry is codifies. Eh, you're just a repeat of ancient times.

                    • What I've actually argued, in keeping with a Federalist stance, is that DOMA was a fine bit of judo, and winds up giving precedent for federal over-reach. But I'll grant you that my personal stance is probably the minority amongst evangelicals, and thus your surmise is not unreasonable, although incorrect.

                    • A state DOMA is no better than a federal one. And local government overreach is no better than a federal one. It is why the feds get called in the first place.

                    • The reason why state overreach is preferable to federal (at least) threefold:
                      (1) Those engaging in the overreach are much closer, vote-wise, to the receiving end of the perfidy. This matters, for example, in the case of Medicaid expansion in Virginia, where we've fought off Greasy Terry McAuliffe's efforts to screw everyone, despite the godless Commie sodomite infestation in my immediate vicinity.
                      (2) In a properly functioning federal system (not to accuse ours of being such) the DC government could provid

                    • It hasn't worked out that way, ever. Your states are nothing but battling fiefdoms, as proven during the first half of the 19th century, the country was going to deteriorate into middle age Europe. And you are wrong, people scale just fine, arbitrary dogmatic, superstitious authority in place of mutual respect does not. So, as long as you try keep your racist, corrupt Sheriff Buford T. Justice around, we'll be needing the cavalry to come in and put him down like the dog that that he is. You are merely tryin

                    • And you are wrong, people scale just fine

                      By my definition of scale, only when you walk back their civil rights overtly via a UCMJ, and culturally through, say, the Navy values of Honor, Courage and Commitment.
                      This is unintentionally funny:

                      It hasn't worked out that way, ever.

                      . . .

                      And your religious bible has no place anywhere in human government.

                      How do you want the report sorted on the ways it did historically, and still does today, at least as an object?
                      Which is kinda moot. Inanimate objects have no bearing on your internal, anti-Theistic bigotry

                      your dogma and attempt to make it universal.

                      Dude, like: totally cosmic non-sequitur, man.
                      You stay beautiful and have a lovely weekend, hear?

  • What does Cheney have to do with anything? Unless they criminally prosecute Hillary, there's no reason to bring him up.

  • I have a nephew who posts every damn conspiracy theory, without even attempting to check out whether it's based on reality or not. Then he goes to extremes to defend it, and some of his arguments are just wrong and easy to verify. He thought Russia was a member of NATO, Cuba didn't have a central bank, that we're closer to WW3 than at any time in the past (we're currently at DEFCON 5, the lowest level, and we've hit DEFCON 2 several times in the past), a study that he claimed pulling out was as effective as

Slashdot Top Deals

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Close