Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal Just Jennifer's Journal: About Me...Part Three 31

Well, I guess it is time to put to rest the crap that tomhudson has been raising about why I am not working in I.T. It is both simple, and complex at the same time...

The truth is, there are several reasons...

The first, and the most simple is, I wanted to maintain my privacy. Somewhat before my beginning transition, I had worked for a couple of years for a research and development firm. As a programmer for this company, I worked on several projects, including an experiment package that went up on the space shuttle. Other projects included a consumer electronic device that allowed people to access football statistics, support software for a seismograph, and a number of other projects. Most of my work was software, though I did assist on some hardware projects as well.

Immediately prior to my transition I became a contract programmer for a company that specializes in printing various items for banks, credit card companies, and apparently health care providers.

I began my transition on a Monday by legally changing my name. I spent the next day getting my paperwork in order (driver's license and Social Security were the primary ones). Then on Wednesday I began my search for a job. Since I wanted to get a fresh start, I went to a local mall, and began there. My first stop was a national department store chain. I was hired on the spot. When I applied I simply implied I was a middle-aged homemaker returning to work because my child was old enough. That was not all that far from the truth. I was assigned to sell lingerie and sleepwear. I did quite well at it, but the money was not great.

I applied for a few programming positions and I discovered something that should not be that surprising to some. It is hard to find work when you are a middle-aged woman. By this time I had requested that my former employers maintain my privacy, but I got no guarantees. I came very close to getting a job at the headquarters of a hardware chain, but I suspect they learned about my past during a major background check. The company that did the background check did not reveal if that was the case, but I have my suspcions.

I did, finally, go to work for a period doing tech support phone center work for an Internet company. I was actually employed by a company that specializes in providing such services. To be honest, I hated the job. It was not a pleasant place to work, and I left because I needed to help my former father-in-law visit his wife who was confined to a nursing home. He was legally blind. After she died, I did look for work in programming, but again had no luck. It was about this time that my ex and I separated.

I decided to return to my work in retail, and I did even better. This time I worked in shoes, where I made much better money (salary plus commission) and then received a promotion that paid an increased salary plus a performance bonus. Now, during all of this time I had become involved with someone. He was a bit younger than me, and was confined to a wheelchair. When he moved to an apartment, I moved in with him. Unfortunately, I was not listed on the lease. After a year together, his father decided that the apartment was too expensive and that he should move to a smaller, subsidized (i.e. Section 8) unit where he would have to live alone.

I was quite devastated. I was deeply depressed, and my doctor talked me into seeking help. I spent about two weeks in the hospital. When I was discharged, I decided to move to San Francisco. While I still had a job, I had no place to live, and no savings to cover the cost of deposits and first month's rent.

I spent a few months in a shelter before getting my first place. It was nothing great, but it gave me a chance to get back on my feet. I went back to school for a while. I decided to abandon computers and programming because I came to believe that they were part of the faux male personality I had created over the years to hide the real me. This is very common among true transsexuals.

Along the way, between terms of school, I did some volunteer work at my current employer. I was then offered a part time job, and decided that employment beat being a starving student. After a couple of year, I received a transfer to a full time job, and then a promotion.

So, that is why I left computers. First, to maintain my privacy until I could attempt to cover my past. Then because apparent age discrimination. And finally, because I thought it wsa not right for me, though I have come to accept my inner geek and have stopped running from that part of my life.

Until next time...
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

About Me...Part Three

Comments Filter:
  • I decided to abandon computers and programming because I came to believe that they were part of the faux male personality I had created over the years to hide the real me

    ... which is a lie, because over the years Usher has posted lots of stuff to different forums, claiming to be a programmer (under the name Tommie), claiming to be taking up programming Delphi, and just last week claiming to be learning how to do iPhone programming

    The truth about Usher? Usher is a kook.

    I'm just a single white female li [google.com]

    • <quote><blockquote><div><p>I decided to abandon computers and programming because I came to believe that they were part of the faux male personality I had created over the years to hide the real me</p></div>
      </blockquote><p> ... which is a lie, because over the years Usher has posted lots of stuff to different forums, claiming to be a programmer (under the name Tommie), claiming to be taking up programming Delphi, and just last week claiming to be learning how
      • plus I have to learn Objective C.

        Thought you said you knew c? Objective c was around 25 years ago. It was crap then and it's crap now.

        • Well now, if the great tomhudson knew as much as he thinks he knows, then he would know the answer.

          While Objective C is built on C, it has additional things that must be learned. It has been over ten years since I wrote an significant C code, or C++. I am a bit rusty.

          And most importantly, and unfortunately, Apple requires that all iPhone code be written in Objective C. Even though other languages will work, they require it be used.

          And a wise programmer does not blame his tools for his own failings.
          • Anyone who knows c++ can bang out objective c code with a few days work. It's a crap language compared to c or c++

            The iPhone market is a dead end. So is the iPad market. It was a fad, and the fad is fading. Already, the apps have been commoditized - the free apps are better than the paid ones, and the iPad is under-powered junk. Shiny junk, but junk. The next generation of smart phones, with large displays, more internal memory, faster processors, more storage, and an open app market like the Evo 4g are al

            • Well, I tended to avoid c++. And, of course, it is a bit more than just Objective C, which I personally think is preferable to C++.

              As to the rest...well, opinions are like posteriors, everyone has one. tomhudson seems to have an astonishing disdain for Apple.

              The iPad has proven to be highly successful as the rest of the industry tries, once again, to play catch-up. And today we see the iPhone 4G which will be on the market before the end of the month, and again, everyone else will be playing catch-up.

              Oh,
              • Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

                by tomhudson ( 43916 )
                Some facts:

                1. Objective c is seen by most programmers as crap for a reason. It's obsolete.

                2. The new iPhone is overpriced and underpowered next to the Evo 4g.

                3. Many of the people buying an iPad find a month later that they're not doing all that much with it - it's too heavy. An Evo 4g will do more, cost less, and is way more open.

                Just as an example, for a few dollars one can use their iPhone as a powerful calculator that would otherwise cost quite a bit more than the iPhone itself. And make calls.

                • As I have said, a wise programmer does not blame his tools. If you program for the iPhone, it is Objective C, period. Not my choice (I would prefer straight C) but you do have to follow their rules.

                  tomhudson is entitled to his opinion. The market seems to disagree.

                  "many of the people?" I wonder, can he cite sources, or is this just his opinion.

                  Ah, the old open source argument. As to Flash, it really is crap. Jobs is right on that one. And for someone who is so smitten with open source, one has to won
                  • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

                    by tomhudson ( 43916 )

                    In case you haven't noticed, thee are open-source implementations of flash available. Oh. that's right - you wouldn't know - you're not a programmer. Adobe has released the format specification http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf/ [adobe.com]

                    You're tow to 3 decades behind the times, and will never catch up.

                    Most iPhone apps are copies of other iPhone apps. Nobody needs 20 post-it note apps.

                    Of course, I realize, not everyone can afford the iPhone. It does require a bit more of an investment (i.e. the don't give them a

                    • Flash is still a proprietary format that is controlled by Adobe. They control the format, determining what can, and cannot, be added.

                      Some iPhone apps offer similar functionality. Many are improvement on previous ideas. Not really copies.

                      Yes, one can purchase an earlier model for less. When the new iPhone comes out, the current model will drop by half, and the previous model will disappear. No, they are not dirt cheap. Like most phones, the price is partially subsidized by the carrier. Without the subs
                    • Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

                      by tomhudson ( 43916 )

                      I've been able to get a 3g for the last 2 years for $99. I don't want it. It doesn't have any must-have features, the screen resolution was crap, etc.

                      Apparently tomhudson is not familiar with OS X, which is full Unix. Of course, the GUI allows those with less knowledge to use the system, much as some modern variants of Linux are easier for users. Apple provides value for a range of users, unlike some systems.

                      It's an interface slapped on top of XNU - X is Not Unix [wikipedia.org]. It contains parts of bsd, etc., and it

                    • XNU is the basis for Darwin, the free OS from Apple. You seem to have that confused with OS X and again have proven that your reading comprehension is zero.

                      You should have looked up the article on OS X, where you would have learned that it is based on Mach, not XNU. Mach was developed as the kernel for BSD UNIX.

                      You seem to keep assuming you I am less knowledgeable than I really am...and that you are smarter than you clearly are.
                    • Mach is just a kernel. Same as linux is just a kernel. The operating system is the kernel + services. Dummy.
                    • And since you've never written any code that interfaces with the kernel directly (I have, on both bsd and linux - it was my job for 3 years), go fuck yourself.

                      Bragging about getting 4.5 on hotornot.com when that's below 99.8% of the population - that's a good one.

  • Some more truth about Usher:

    Usher lies about a lot of things. Usher thinks that it's okay to attack someone else on-line for 7 years and trivializing their being raped because Usher says it wasn't rape:
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1669728&cid=32473562 [slashdot.org]

    JustJennifer wrote:

    As I pointed out, this person was NOT raped. This was a man wno was sodomized in jail, probably for something related to the Thai sex trade.

    And it should be notec, my disagreement with this person is not relate

    • tomhudson is like a broken record. He just keeps repeating the same tired stuff.
      • Truth hurts, hm. How about we immortalize your latest lie - fresh from earlier this evening:

        Jennifer Usher claims rape isn't rape!

        http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1669728&cid=32473562

        by Just Jennifer (1823464) writes: on 2010-06-06 2:49 (#32473562)
        As I pointed out, this person was NOT raped. This was a man wno was sodomized in jail, probably for something related to the Thai sex trade.

        I set the record straight:
        http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1669728&cid=32476412

        You are disgusting.

        Quoting Ush
        • This all just semantical games on the part of tomhudson. I prefer the specific, and classic meaning of the term:

          The various definitions of rape range from the broad (coercing an individual to engage in any sexual act) to the specific (forcing a woman to submit to sexual intercourse).

          Forced sodomy is far rarer than women being raped. And the experience is different. Worse, the man we are discussing tried to claim his experience was like that of a woman, and suggested he was raped because the attacker saw
          • This all just semantical games on the part of tomhudson. I prefer the specific, and classic meaning of the term:

            You're such a liar. You were referring to the legal term of rape.

            You said this: [slashdot.org]

            Not in the eyes of the law in most states. They are two separate crimes. Rape is forced sexual intercourse with a woman. Sodomy is forced sexual intercourse with a man.

            And you were 100% wrong.

            And like always, you try to spin, spin, spin ... but you've been lying for a decade now, and we're on to your stupidi

            • First off, Usenet is not a legal forum and that was where the discussion took place. Again, in some states rape is reserved for woman. I know that is, or at least was the case in Alabama.

              And, for the record, I am not a legal scholar. But then, tomhudson thinks he knows everything, and presumes to speak for everyone.

              What a total jerk.
              • You made a specific claim. You're full of shit, and you got caught on it.

                As for your claim not to be a legal scholar, it's about time!

                One of your previous bull-shit legal threats
                http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100228110547332 [transboutique.com]

                From: jennisuzan@gmail.com
                I am going to say this once, and once only. If you immediately remove the
                copyrighted material from your website then this matter will be ended. The
                artwork in question is the image of me from my website. I cannot make that
                any clearer.

  • http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100604221218598 [transboutique.com]

    Some background on Jennifer Usher, who often trolls transsexual and transgender support sites and forums using the name JustJennifer.

    Topics in this post include

    • Jennifer Usher's attacks on transgender and transsexual women,
    • years of attacks on a woman who was raped,
    • a crude attempt at outing me,
    • claims of 'special privilege',
    • the University of California San Francisco's action (or lack thereof) over the years concerning Usher's use of UCS
  • Tom has been around the dot for many years. In fact I'm not certain whether I've known her for 8 years or 9 through JEs and comments. Indeed, for awhile we had here what was called The Circle, or Teh Circle. It was a group of folks who posted JEs regularly, and we would comment in each others JEs. Tom was a part of that, as was I, and dozens of others. Over time people drifted away, but new ones have come in, and there are some older types around here like Tom and myself. The point being, that I have

The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin

Working...