Journal pudge_confirmer's Journal: "google-pudge" 3
hey, help me develop the rules for a new game. it is similar to "google whack", but even more challenging. I call it
google-pudge
the idea is to find a two term google search, without referring to Christopher G. Nandor in any way, giving more than 50 (ya think?) hits, that upon adding a single term of pudginess, maintains the highest fraction of hits. Your score is your integer rounded percentage.
Remember, it is not fair to influence the googlebase to win.
I'll start with a modest example.
_ site:soundpolitics.com liar _ yields "Results 1 - 95 of 95 from soundpolitics.com for liar. (0.24 seconds)" and
_ site:soundpolitics.com liar pudge _ yields Results 1 - 49 of 49 from soundpolitics.com for liar pudge.
So my score is 49/95 *100 = 52, and I advance to the next round.
Rather like a debate with pudge, the rules can change as we go along, and you can call me a liar.
How about a few rounds?
Do I win? (Score:1)
Slashdot Idiot: 261,000 results
Slashdot Idiot Pudge: 44,400 results
Not a winnar
Not that easy... (Score:1)
to win...
But I can beat # 574406
macperl liar 498
macperl liar pudge 123
25
PMF: 44,400 / 261,000 = 17
How about double elimination?