Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×
User Journal

Journal Raindance's Journal: A couple brainstorms on theoretical biology 3

I recently blogged a couple brainstorms on potential tools in the field of phylogeny-

Long-term alternatives to our current common-descent model in contexts where horizontal gene transfer is significant;

Logarithmic Evolution Distance, an intuitive computational approach to comparing genomes.

They were a lot of fun to think about; perhaps they'd be fun to read if you like theoretical biology stuff.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A couple brainstorms on theoretical biology

Comments Filter:
  • But by then we will all have specialized so much we still won't be speaking a common language :-)

  • ...that's the limiting factor for the accuracy of the new 'log, correct? That and how to involve "junk" DNA.

    Anyway, this is why I love having so many friends on slashdot, the gems show up.

    • Yeah, defining the mutation operations permitted to happen on a genome between generations is really important to this metric, complex, and a little underdetermined by current evolutionary theory. Which is not to say a metric like this need hit it right on the head-- it's the sort of thing where an imperfect model of allowed mutations /should/ bias various comparisons more-or-less equally. In theory. :)

You scratch my tape, and I'll scratch yours.