Journal damn_registrars's Journal: Congratulations, You Are Number 13 7
Congratulations to insanecarbonbasedlif, you have recently joined the club. You have pointed out to the hyper-con railgunner and his loyal ditto-heads that his claims have no merit, he can't back up his crap rhetoric, he doesn't know how to discuss issues in a civilized and intelligent manner, he smells bad, and he is wearing no clothes.
OK, one of those might not be true; but that's iffy.
Though I beat you to that club by several months.. Nonetheless, congratulations to number 13, from number 1.
OK, one of those might not be true; but that's iffy.
Though I beat you to that club by several months.. Nonetheless, congratulations to number 13, from number 1.
Bullshit (Score:1)
By the way: HAY! LOOK WHO'S POSTING HERE! And you hadn't noticed yet.
By the way: When you whine and cry about being foed, yet have foes yourself, you come across as a disingenious hypocritical twit and a dumbass.
LOVE AND KISSES,
Red
You're wrong, troll (Score:2)
I was foed long before you ever came around, dumbass. So was tmp, RWS, JC, HILJ, and several others.
If you were paying attention you would know that when RG was using the moniker naqamel [slashdot.org] he dropped all the names from the RG foes list. He foe'd me (under both names) while he was using the other name, before going back to RG.
Hence I was the first on the current list.
By the way: HAY! LOOK WHO'S POSTING HERE! And you hadn't noticed yet.
I noticed, I just didn't care. I knew who you were earlier. Go away.
When you whine and cry about being foed
Wrong again. Go back and read my journal entries. I never whined about the act of being foed, rather I mocked the fools who foed me. I have pointed out that they use
13 is an asupicious number (Score:1)
I'm not surprised there's a freak club that's built up over time, but I'm surprised there's only 13 of us in there. It seems like there would be more, considering his apparent lack of ability to understand logic and handle critical questions.
I gather from your response to hairpinred that Railgunner dumped his previous foe list recently, so I guess that explains the low number.
Re:13 is an auspicious number (Score:1)
That should be "auspicious" in the title, as "asupicious" looks like some weird new word meaning "not supicious", whatever "supicious" means.
Re: (Score:2)
I gather from your response to hairpinred that Railgunner dumped his previous foe list recently, so I guess that explains the low number.
Correct. I first knew railgunner [slashdot.org] as naqamel [slashdot.org]. And before naqamel, there was, well, railgunner. Back when the current railgunner was writing as naqamel, he was also obsessed with spouting hard-core fact-deprived conservative nonsense. Then when he switched back to the current name, he deleted all the old journal entries.
Unfortunately for him, that doesn't delete the conversation from the same. Here is a good example of my deflating his poorly constructed "argument" [slashdot.org] from a while ago. The only response
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, the way he ignores the criticisms is very odd. I don't know why he bothers to post his thoughts if he doesn't care for people to examine them.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know why he bothers to post his thoughts if he doesn't care for people to examine them.
I don't think the thoughts are actually his own. One could probably make an argument that he hasn't posted an original thought in his journal, well, possibly ever. He usually just posts partisan nonsense from partisan editorials and calls them news. As you have seen, sometimes they are so far removed from reality that they almost approach a comedic status.