Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Think my writings here are crazy? More

Think my writings here are crazy?

Comments Filter:

  • I only think you're a little crazy. :) (As I'm sure I am too.) But I didn't think your pro-life post there was crazy, I thought it was sound reasoning, my only reservation being that you may be discounting the effects of GW's (i.e. a Republican, and GOP legislators approving) appointing loyal constitutionalists to the Supreme Court -- the appointees taken together surely was a (major) step towards "unfinding" the right to abortion that doesn't exist in the Constitution, even if not enough to make it happen.

    • The main point for the new blog was more the post on autism. There really is this crazy fight going on in the autistic's world right now caused by point of view- the point of view of adult autistics, who have been trying to get attention applied to the sudden "epidemic" for 25 years now, vs the sudden discovery of the epidemic by groups of apparently well financed parents of autistics (all those adverts on TV about how 1:150, or 1:120, depending on whose numbers you believe, children will be autistic, vs c
    • P.S.- an interesting topic I'd like to get into with you sometime is how I see the motivations behind the culture of death- and how the Declaration of Independence affects that (in that it promised both an inalienable Right to Life and a Right to Pursuit of Happiness, which in the last few decades seem to be at odds with one another). But I'm not quite sure how to word it yet, it needs more thought to word the question in such a way that it isn't automatically biased against profit.

      • In formulating your thoughts, you might wish to look at this [wikipedia.org], if you haven't already. A justice's opinion quoted therein (emphasis mine):

        Among these inalienable rights, as proclaimed in that great document, is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant the right to pursue any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give to them their highest enjoyment.

        IMO the two c

  • ..pull the plug on anyone in the hospital who isn't a perfectly fit 20-30 year old. Yep, the culture of death is working towards that goal, the new eugenics party. They won't admit to being eugenicists, but their actions prove it. They also run with the "man is the worst thing for the planet" crowd and want to reduce the world's populations down to like half a billion tops (and they get to stay of course), and herd everyone left into their landlord owned and operated termite cities where they can be taxed i

  • For example, I disagree with you that increased local government control (which you mentioned in another recent entry) would actually have the desired affects. *Community* control would, but that's so remote from circumstances that I don't see the relevance. Crazy? You seem like one of the least crazy people on slashdot (which may not be much consolation.)

    The Republican party is not going to make any real progress on either -
    1) Some legal restrictions on access to abortion (like they have in Eur

    • I'm trying, at present, to figure out how to start a discussion on this. Yes, as it appears, the right to personal property (the pursuit of happiness) seems to at present be opposed to a right to life. And I personally think point #2 is coming, both from the perspective of putting the right to life OVER the right to profit, and from a simple science perspective (genetically, life begins at conception, and NOTHING we've seen indicates later lines have any basis in science).

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Close