Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal maynard's Journal: Alternate Bailout: Let us liquidate our 401Ks! 2

Underneath the all the conflicting rationales behind Paulson's bailout plan is a simple fact: US citizens, on average, owe more on their mortgages than property valuations justify. Giving Wall Street firms bunch of the Public's money to offset their losses won't change that underlying fact. Further, it will worsen the situation for homeowners given that the very same people who are unable to pay their mortgage loans will be required to pay off the bailout. Just who are they trying to save anyway?

Here's a Main Street solution: Why not change the rules for 401K retirement accounts to allow individuals to liquidate all or part of their retirement holdings without penalty, as long as the money is transferred to their mortgage holder to pay down principal on their home. The money should also be available to help individuals refinance out of dangerous variable interest rate HELoC (Home Equity Lines of Credit) and ARM (Adjustable Rate Mortgage) loans.

In each case, if the homeowner has enough funds saved in his or her 401K to offset their negative equity stake and/or get out from under a risky loan, the homeowner wins and the mortgage banks win. Society wins. Also, no public funds would have been used. And US citizens wouldn't be held responsible for paying off a bunch of Wall Street parasites who lost everything due to their irresponsible profligacy. Thus, a moral hazard for the rich would not - this time, at least - have been promoted as U.S. fiscal policy. Just an idea.

Discuss.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Alternate Bailout: Let us liquidate our 401Ks!

Comments Filter:
  • Some people will liquidate the retirement savings, even pay their mortgage as you suggest and then get a home equity loan against now paid down mortgage & spend.

    Good for the economy until the money runs out & these people are back where they started from.

    I have no problem letting people screw themselves over but how much collateral damage - think more taxpayer money needed to pay for their retirement that they no longer have themselves - think medical bills.

    • by maynard ( 3337 )

      That wouldn't happen because the banks have changed their leverage and equity rules for HELoCs. In fact, I doubt anyone could be approved for a HELoC until this whole mess is untanged, because banks can't predict where valuations will finally bottom out. Until equilibrium is reached on the price falls, lending will remain as conservative as possible.

The rule on staying alive as a program manager is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once.

Working...