Journal NewYorkCountryLawyer's Journal: Should RIAA's investigator have to disclose backup? 12
A technology battle is raging in UMG v. Lindor in Brooklyn over whether the RIAA's investigator, SafeNet (formerly known as MediaSentry), which has produced certain *txt printouts, now needs to disclose its digital files, validation methodology, testing procedures, failure rates, software manuals, protocols, packet logs, source code, and other materials, so that the validity of its methods can be evaluated by the other side. SafeNet and the RIAA say no, the information is "proprietary and confidential". Ms. Lindor says yes, if you're going to testify in federal court the other side has a right to test your evidence. A list of what is being sought is here (pdf). MediaSentry has produced 'none of the above'. "Put up or shut up" says one commentator to MediaSentry. What do you say?
But of course (Score:2)
The same goes for if I conduct trials on their equipment on their behest. I even enco
Re: (Score:2)
"If they have nothing to hide, why not supply the information? What are they, terrorists?"
Or, are they really claiming that the defendant/some other witness might be able to steal business from them if their methodologies are published? Why not file under seal?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What, maybe the fact that they have no hard evidence??
This strikes me as akin to the police saying, "We have your fingerprints, and we claim they came from the crime scene, but we won't tell you what methods we used to acquire them." So how do you know they actually lifted said fingerprints from the scene?? maybe they came from your old Army induction form instead!
Evidence without provenance is just hearsay.
Expert Testimony Invalid if Proprietary (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Wh
Re: (Score:2)
[snip] /. is a CS/IT warrior. Wool milling? Do ya'll work in any of the other clothing materials, such as cotton? Just curious how that whole system works, if the mills stick to one sort of fabric/material? I presume ya'll don't weave the fabric there either?
---
So, apparently not everyone at
Ex-IT. Now we have a family business doing traditional handcrafts: handmade lye soap, candles (beeswax, tallow, palm wax, and some paraffin), and woolens. We process wool, spin, knit, and weave. We also do some work with cotton, linen, etc. My wife is working on a research project right now with heritage varieties of upland colored cotton. This particular variety is green from the get go and darkens with washing (as opposed to dyed cotton, which fades). We also brew wine, cider, and mead (can't sell that),
Maybe. (Score:2)
This begins to sound like SCO. "We have evidence, but won't show you..."
But in this instance, there might be a reason for it. In addition to the false positives that mediaSentry has sent out (I've know I've had some for which the IP address wasn't in use at the time they claim), there might also be exploitable false negatives. If their methods were published, then it's likely that "safe" file sharing programs -- which would evade existing enforcement methods -- would be created.
Maybe. But if that w
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, I posed the above before reading TFAs (My UID is in the middle 5-digits).
It looks like they do claim that this discovery would reveal exploitable false negatives. That's probably a "good beef."
They claim that the plaintiff already gave you their file -- so that's what evidence they had when they decided to bring the lawsuit, right? It seems like that would either be "good enough" or not.
I see that SafeNet's document seems to say that they only connected to the KaZaA servers, and not to the IP
Re: (Score:2)
Of course they won't give it to you... (Score:2)