NewYorkCountryLawyer's Journal: RIAA Short on Cash? Fails to Pay Debbie Foster fees

Can it be that the RIAA, or the "Big 4" record companies it represents, are short on funds? It turns out that despite the Judge's order, entered a month ago, telling them to pay Debbie Foster $68,685.23 in attorneys fees, in Capitol v. Foster, they have failed to make payment, and Ms. Foster has now had to ask the Court to enter Judgment, so that she can commence "post judgment collection proceedings". According to Ms. Foster's motion papers (pdf), her attorneys received no response to their email inquiry about payment. Perhaps the RIAA should ask their lawyers for a loan.

Well...

[Billosaur]

...they certainly can't borrow any money from SCO, now can they?

Re:

[NewYorkCountryLawyer]

.they certainly can't borrow any money from SCO, now can they?

Well I think the RIAA's lawyers have a lot of money by now; maybe they can spot them some dough.

Risk of Further Penalties

[andphi]

Would the RIAA (or their lawyers) risk further penalties, levied by the courts themselves, if they persist in non-payment?

Re:

[NewYorkCountryLawyer]

Would the RIAA (or their lawyers) risk further penalties, levied by the courts themselves, if they persist in non-payment?

Yes, absolutely.