Scientists cast doubt on Kennedy bullet analysis

Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

Journal SPAM: Scientists cast doubt on Kennedy bullet analysis 2

Journal by Jeremiah Cornelius on Thursday May 17, 2007 @12:54PM

The "evidence used to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed," concludes a new article in the Annals of Applied Statistics written by former FBI lab metallurgist William A. Tobin and Texas A&M University researchers Cliff Spiegelman and William D. James.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Scientists cast doubt on Kennedy bullet analysis

Load All Comments

Search 2 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

I admit it (Score:1)

by Profane MuthaFucka ( 574406 ) * writes:

I'm a single bullet theory kind of guy.
- Re: (Score:1)
  
  by Profane MuthaFucka ( 574406 ) * writes:
  
  Dang it, I was eating my lunch and I realized that I had fucked up that reference to Single Gun Theory. It's not single bullet theory.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Gun_Theory [wikipedia.org]

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry

Journal SPAM: Scientists cast doubt on Kennedy bullet analysis 2

Scientists cast doubt on Kennedy bullet analysis More Login

Scientists cast doubt on Kennedy bullet analysis

I admit it (Score:1)

Re: (Score:1)

Slashdot Top Deals

Slashdot