heliocentric's Journal: [warning: adult content] an odd question about sex

Okay, hopefully there's a sex-ed teacher out there, I have a bizarre sex question.

Hypothetically speaking you're a guy and you are naked and have an erection. You are with goatse-guy and he is "spread." You two play a game sort of like the classic Operation. You insert your device but do not touch the walls or the end. You remove your device.

Now, did you just have sex with goatse-guy?

You had your wang inside of him, you could probably even feel some heat radiate off of his body, but there was no touching.

Now, what about if you did the same trick with one of those girls that can put champagne bottles into her parts? You know, the ones that do traffic cones for exhibition. Did you have sex with her? You had your schlong well inside of her, and it wasn't even her mouth so Clinton debates cannot enter here.

Sorry about this one, I was just pondering the old game Operation and one thing lead to another... Hey, you know, I wonder what would light up on goatse-guy if you did touch one of the sides!

My take...

[Tet]

No. For me, there needs to be some kind of contact. Otherwise, what's they point?

Re:My take...

[FuzzyBad-Mofo]

Is someone a little Helio-curious? Being gay, I think I can answer this one. If one of the parties got off on it, then yeah, it's sex. If not, it was a weird experiment. Hope that helps! :)

We should invade the USA, kill Ann Coulter and convert them all to atheism.

I'm on board with that. At the least, teach the masses some critical thinking skills for Bob's sake.

It is still sex

[linzeal]

If you cum on their face.

mod parent up

[mekkab]

That's what it is.

Here's another situ: You are on one side of the room; they are on the other. Both masturbate.

What is that?

Simple

[Iamthefallen]

The moment the ball passes the goal line, it's a touchdown whether or not contact with the endzone was made.

Re:Simple

[Red Warrior]

But remember, you are required to have control of the ball, and at least one foot in bounds...

Re:Simple

[Iamthefallen]

Hmm, what if forward movement has been stopped, but Goatse guy backs up, is the play still in action or not?

Re:Simple

[Ethelred Unraed]

I don't know, but I sure as hell don't want to see the replay.

Cheers,

Ethelred

Re:Simple

[heliocentric]

But remember, you are required to have control of the ball, and at least one foot in bounds...

But... the goal line goes around the world, you can have the ball out of bounds as you fall and have the ball cross the goal line, next to the pylon, and have a touch down.

But, you have to have control of the ball, you've got that right.

However, your statement could be further enhanced by stating if you are receiving a pass and you are in the end zone, then the rules of posessions apply including having feet in the

That totally depends...

[TopShelf]

... on whether someone expects a phone call the next day...

no contact, no sex

[Eil]

Dude, that is weird. :P But seriously, I'd have to say that if there were no contact, then there was no sex. A better phrase would be "fooling around".