Journal Chacham's Journal: InPassing: Walking is cute, Talking is bad. 17
From the hallowed halls of the men's bathroom today i heard something like the following, when two people were talking about (one who's wife was) having a kid:
Walking is cute, talking is bad. Trust me.
Then:
Once they start talking, they don't shut up.
And after guy one left, guy two continued with guy three:
Well, the baby didn't have a cell phone in his ear, so it can't be a girl.
--
I can't say much for the latter, but the first comment seemed quite backwards to me. Walking enables the child to get into all sorts of trouble, yet talking allows you to know what they are thinking.
I guess that to him a child is just a toy, when they walk it's an upgraded model, but as soon as they talk they're as annoying as a U-Scan checkout lane in the market.
I find it sad that such people lack the appreciation of the beauty and wonder of a child.
In their defense (Score:2)
If you deal with teenagers on a regular basis you sometimes do wish that the talking fucntion were disabled. Usually because it has a tendency to get stuck in "obstinate argument mode." ;-)
Re:In their defense (Score:2)
Heh.
But seriously, think about it. Imagine teens actually couldn't talk. Do you think all that angst would just delightfully dissappear?
Re:In their defense (Score:2)
Seriously though, that's just what most fathers do. They commiserate over the trouble of children. It's a release valve. Most still feel fiercely protective of and caring about their children, they just don't show it as publicly.
And besides, have you never seen one of those, "Kids Say The Darndest Things" shows, or whatever? They can really get you into trouble with guests, bosses, relatives, etc.
Re:In their defense (Score:2)
I think they would, they'd just find another avenue.
Seriously though, that's just what most fathers do. They commiserate over the trouble of children. It's a release valve. Most still feel fiercely protective of and caring about their children, they just don't show it as publicly.
Probably. Regardless, it's hard to ignore such nonsense.
Re:In their defense (Score:2)
As a father of little ones (Score:2)
Watch star wars daddy?
no- not this morning
star wars?
no- not right now
luke good guy?
yes, luke is the good g
Re:As a father of little ones (Score:2)
I'm not trying to say that his comment was wrong. Just that he thought walking was fine. I'd have to say walking is a lot worse for the kid given the new areas he can reach. That made an impression on me as stated.
The main point of the JE though is just to repeat it. Agree or not, it's just an interesting subject.
Re:As a father of little ones (Score:2)
And once they walk they climb. A 6 year old died last week when he tried to climb a pile of bricks in his yard and they fell on him. Man, being
Re:As a father of little ones (Score:2)
Thanx.
"pets that talk" (Score:1)
Some people see children as "pets that talk". Not really consciously think that, but act as if it were so, in that they give them the level of attention as they would the family dog. They also should not have children. What I find sad is people who don't particularly li
Re:"pets that talk" (Score:2)
But that immaturity is not because they can be mature but choose not to be, which would annoy me as well.
Thanx for the comment. I agree and disagree with your point. I agree with the sentiment, but not with the choice not to have children. I believe in propogration of the species and all that, though there is room for discussion about the unworthy.
Re:"pets that talk" (Score:1)
But that immaturity is not because they can be mature but choose not to be, which would annoy me as well.
Then you have the correct mentality to have kids.
For me, I'm not annoyed by the intent to be immature, I'm just annoyed by the immaturity itself. Of course I know kids can't help it and I don't blame them, but I dislike it all the same.
I believe in propogration of the spe
Re:"pets that talk" (Score:2)
Yes. It's a verse, Isaiah 45:18 [blueletterbible.org]. So that's where the basic belief comes from. Of course, Genesis 9:1 [blueletterbible.org] more or less commands it.
Now, with that said, competency must come into the picture, though, i'm not one for legislation.
Re:"pets that talk" (Score:1)
Re:"pets that talk" (Score:2)
To see that more directly, go to the Genesis 9:1 [blueletterbible.org] verse, click on the "C" [blueletterbible.org] and look at the Concordance entry for "male'" then click on Strong's entry 04 [blueletterbible.org]
Re:"pets that talk" (Score:1)
Agreed. And since the world is populated, I think we're off the hook on this one.
That's an interesting mistranslation you point out. Thankfully my NIV and NKJV each correctly have "fill" for both. And thank you for bringing that web site to my attention.
Re:"pets that talk" (Score:2)
We'll have to disagree on that. I appreciate where you're coming from on that one. Personally, until G-d says that's enough, i'll go with the "we're not done yet" idea.
That's an interesting mistranslation you point out. Thankfully my NIV and NKJV each correctly have "fill" for both.
OK, good. I just use the Hebrew, as any translation is missing something. A language is the speech of the soul, and a soul is just a point of view. Well,