He obviously used this bizarre wildcard pattern because it matches "Linux", but doesn't match any of the BSDs. This should make sense to the/. crowd, since BSD is dying.
BSD is dying? I think not! Ask people who work in the real world what they use and they'll tell you they have one or two *BSD servers in their cool room.
This [slashdot.org]
recent post on slashdot attests to this.
I'd say just *x*, case insensitive. This way, you'll cover most of the lot. What is this thing about the letter X, by the way? Unix, XFree, Linux, XP.. you name it (I know, *BSD).
No can do. It's a quote from the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams; but the sig-limit limits me from quoting all of it. It ends this way:..worked out. --Douglas Adams
I'm too lazy to change it, or find a new sig. So as of now it's left as an exercise for the reader.
*n*x? (Score:5, Funny)
I was willing to tolerate *nix, since it might, however remote and esoteric, be an attempt to gather all Unixes under a single label. But *n*x?
I sure hope it does not deteriorate to a four-letter-word-like ***x. Or maybe *x or x^ ?
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
Re:*n*x?-Open Source Porn. (Score:0)
The porn OS. "Come here and let me look under your covers."
Re:*n*x?-Open Source Porn. (Score:1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
upgrade to the power of *n?x today!
Re:*n*x? (Score:5, Funny)
Re Carrie-Ann Moss (Score:-1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:5, Funny)
and did you ever wonder what would have happened if Dave Packard won the coin toss? We'd have PH-UX... try to pronounce THAT one!
If Tux phux, then we'll have little tuxes running around!
Re:*n*x? (Score:2)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
No, because Tux is gay.
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:4, Funny)
D*GSH*T.
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
-uso.
The Devil made me do it (Score:1)
Wow, imagine a Beowulf cluster of those.
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:2)
This [slashdot.org] recent post on slashdot attests to this.
Re:*n*x? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
*n*x -> Windows XP
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
*looks at title, sees: Re:*n*x?*
Oh, what's that? A ?, yes.
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
But i personally like *?*?*?*x
Re:*n*x? (Score:2)
Re:*n*x? (Score:1)
Re:*n*x? (Score:2)
I'm too lazy to change it, or find a new sig. So as of now it's left as an exercise for the reader.
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
Re:*n*x? (Score:0)
The Least Confusing Regular Expression (Score:2)
Re:The Least Confusing Regular Expression (Score:1, Funny)