Time Names Battlestar Galactica Show Of The Year 520
szyzyg writes "Time Magazine's Television Critic James Poniewozik has put Battlestar Galactica at the top of his list of the Best TV Shows from 2005. His summary starts off 'Most of you probably think this entry has got to be a joke. The rest of you have actually watched the show.'"
Another Note About The List... (Score:5, Interesting)
6 out of 10 shows on the list are cable/satellite only and of those, 2 are on pay channels only. Can the big networks like ABC, CBS, and NBC compete anymore? It seems like the talent has moved elsewhere and the big three are caving in under their own weight.
http://religiousfreaks.com/ [religiousfreaks.com]Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:2)
*ahem*
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's about risk taking. The major networks simply aren't willing to take risks. They wait for the latest flavor of the month and then rush to copy it. A million versions of CSI, a million versions of Law and Order, a million reality shows. The big three have become a joke. ABC is the only network of the big three that has non-news related shows that I bother to TiVo anymore. Fox, FX, Sci-Fi and HBO are where it's at now. FX has to be my favorite network in terms of original programming. The Shield, Rescue Me and Nip / Tuck are great shows and Thief looks promising. HBO would be next in line with Deadwood, Rome, Curb Your Enthusiam and The Soporanos (which should end after this season ... talk about dragging things out .. but it's still better than 80% of the other shows on TV).
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:5, Interesting)
The guy that OK'd Lost's very expensive pilot episode was sacked for it.
And then the network made a fortune. As far as I know, they didn't hire him back.
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:5, Informative)
And then the network made a fortune. As far as I know, they didn't hire him back.
You're talking about Lloyd Braun [yahoo.com]. From the bio: "During his tenure with the ABC Entertainment Television Group, Braun initiated and oversaw the development of such successful programs as "Alias", "Lost", "Desperate Housewives", "Grey's Anatomy", "Extreme Makeover", "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition" and "Boston Legal".
ABC fired him before his shows were aired and put the network in the #1 slot. He's now at Yahoo.
--Ajay
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:5, Funny)
... and it only took them 3 monkeys with typewriters.
I'm sure the suits look at that and say: 'cost effective'.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Why spend so much of your life watching TV? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why spend so much of your life watching TV? (Score:4, Funny)
You're right. Clearly his time is much better spent replying to posts about a TV show on slashdot.
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:3, Interesting)
I would personally argue that LOST is the best show on any network, and it's not on this list. The more you watch it, the better it gets... and it's already good on first viewing.
A year ago, I'd have put Desperate Housewives up there too (though no longer).
Both of those are ABC shows, and I think they prove that the major nets can and do still produce
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:4, Insightful)
A few gems and a LOT of crap. (Score:2)
Re:A few gems and a LOT of crap. (Score:4, Insightful)
This phrase "vanishingly small", I do not think it means what you think it means. CSI is on air something like 3 hours every day, and you're also watching a CSI clone...
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:3, Interesting)
Last I remember, Friends ended, and they were using the show about the gay lawyer and his ding-bat platonic girlfriend as their "anchor" sit-com. Is that still what's on? Does anybody know or care?
Re:Another Note About The List... (Score:3, Informative)
And because they are on cable, the expectations are lower. Galactica gets ratings like 2.0, 2.1, and it is SciFi's most successful show ratings-wise. They don't need "high" ratings to make money. We'd never see a show like Battlestar Galactica being made by NBC, simply because the audience is
And most importantly... (Score:5, Funny)
Attention authors of lesbian slash fanfic, that is not an invitation to depict... or is it?
The sex slave 6 (Score:2)
Re:And most importantly... (Score:5, Insightful)
They're not trying to influence you. The character is manipulating humans, particularly Baltar, and using their human instincts to do it. You should feel like it's manipulation, because it is. It just doesn't happen to be directed at you.
The whole human-form cylons thing rankles me, too
You don't "get" the show, then. It's not a cost-saving measure. It's the essence of the show. The cylons are biological. They think and breath and live. They profess a belief in a God that gives them life, and that they are our successors. Are they right? Do they even really believe that? As characters, it's those questions that give them depth in intrigue.
the camera would zoom in on their face
That does bother a lot of people, but as far as I can tell, the crew is trying to imitate the way real humans view the world. The camera focuses narrowly when a human watching would feel tense, because that's what a human does. The camera shakes and darts, because that's what our eyes do. You're not accustomed to seeing a camera do it, and it may never catch on as a technique (many will appreciate that), but it's interesting to see it done, when you understand what's happening.
Re:And most importantly... (Score:3)
I never held out much hope for a producer that couldn't even get that bit of the original right, as heavy handed as the original was about it.
Re:And most importantly... (Score:4, Insightful)
Clearly your definition of "excess" is very different from mine.
I would define the scenes of the illusionary 6 sauntering around in her tight red halter dresses to seduce Dr. Baltar as "just about the right amount" of sex on the show, and if anything, "not enough."
But I could see why it would bother you... if you are gay.
Re:And most importantly... (Score:3, Insightful)
In character, that's the case. The creators of the show, however, are not in character. Out of character, there really isn't a robot trying to ma
Re:And most importantly... (Score:5, Insightful)
That was the best episode yet. The whole show questions the validity of the cylons' claim to humanity, and that episode puts the questions in very certain terms. Are the cylons "human" enough to be entitled to human rights? Was it morally wrong for the soldiers to rape the cylon they'd captured? If not, then would it have been wrong to do the same to Sharon?
That episode was directed at everyone who did not or does not believe that the cylons are "human" themselves. If they're "toasters", as so many of the human characters believe, then is anything that you do to them wrong? There are definitely characters in the show that think so, and in believing so, they are beginning to see the cylons as a living race.
Of course the show is an allegory. Rape is torture. The cylons, as a race, are trying to exterminate the human race, although some individual cylons don't support that goal. Are the humans justified in torturing the individuals that they perceive as the enemy? What if they cylons might give up some information that could save human lives by doing so?
Re:And most importantly... (Score:3, Insightful)
there are some heinous examples of people flinging insults at each other over a subjective opinion
It's slashdot. What did you expect?
I haven't said anything about the presentation of the cylons as living beings.
Presumably you made the claim that the human-form cylons were a cost-sa
Maybe now they'll get more than 10 episodes/season (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Maybe now they'll get more than 10 episodes/sea (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Maybe now they'll get more than 10 episodes/sea (Score:2)
Re:Maybe now they'll get more than 10 episodes/sea (Score:3, Informative)
A pleasant suprise (Score:5, Insightful)
The sad part is... (Score:2, Informative)
The Simpsons went downhill after Conan left and they shipped all their animation to Asia.
Congratulations! (Score:2)
Lost? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Lost? (Score:2)
Unfortunately, it has gone a little downhill in the second season. But IMHO it's still good scifi drama.
Re:Lost? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Lost? (Score:2)
BSG started his run in January of 2005
Re:Lost? (and Grey's Anatomy) (Score:4, Informative)
Grey's Anatomy [go.com] is another great show too.
Re:Lost? (Score:5, Insightful)
Lost is what happens when the marketing suits are in charge of writing the script. Cynical TV at its worst.
Re:Lost? (Score:3, Insightful)
Peaks was one of those shows you either loved or hated. The whole yuppies eating donuts fad at Peaks Parties was pretty damned lame, but I thought the show had some real depth for its time. It strung people along to solve the mystery, and pioneered the concept of an episode representing a discrete increment of time (1 episode = 1 day in Twin Peaks), like 24 did years later. If only Season 2 would make it to DVD...
Re:Lost? (Score:5, Interesting)
Umm, yeah, whatever.
I watched every episode in the first season, where they built up mystery upon mystery upon mystery. That's fine, but at some point, you have to solve the mystery. I figured they'd answer most of the questions in the season finale, but no, they just made up more questions. At this point, we still don't have any clue what's going on - whether the doctor is dreaming the whole thing, or they're subjects of an experiment, or they're actually lost on a tropical island.
Personally, I think the writers don't have a clue, either. They probably only wrote enough for the first season and they didn't expect the show to become popular. When it was very popular, they got caught off-guard and now they're scrambling to keep up.
Re:Lost? (Score:3)
You're telling this to the crowd who watched x-files. Talk about preaching to the deaf.
Re:Lost? (Score:4, Informative)
Umm, Stargate? (Score:3, Funny)
I'm surprised that neither Stargate SG-1 nor Atlantis are on the list.
Personally, Stargate beats BSG anyday.
Re:Umm, Stargate? (Score:2)
Re:Umm, Stargate? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Umm, Stargate? (Score:5, Interesting)
Not the last season, that's for sure. I don't know what they're trying to do, introducing another "invincible enemy", at this point.
Come on, Stargate writers, it's time to reveal the stargate to the public. All the social, political, and economic fallout would give you at least another two seasons' worth of material. Then, re-visit a bunch of the planets we've been to before and let's see if SG-1 made things better. (What happened to O'Neil's child, for instance?)
Anyway, I'm afraid this might be the last season for SG-1, and that would be disappointing.
It kind of grows on you (Score:5, Interesting)
And after watching the original series again for the first time in over 20 years, it wasn't nearly as good as I remember - even the first season before it started going south. (I won't even mention Galactica 1980) I was only 12 or so at the time the originals came out, so my standards in entertainment were probably lower. On a negative note, I would swear both original and new series must have been sponsored by a tobacco company.
I hope next season will be still showing on weekends in HD.
I wonder when the six million dollar man remake comes out?
$6 million man (Score:5, Funny)
I wonder when the six million dollar man remake comes out?
We can rebuild him.
Re:It kind of grows on you (Score:3)
Re:It kind of grows on you (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It kind of grows on you (Score:4, Funny)
Six Million Dollar Man remake though? Uh....no thanks!
With inflation the way it has been since the "Six Million Dollar Man" was aired, it would need to be the "60 Gajillion Dollar Man" to have the same impact. Otherwise, you'll have a show about a guy wearing a Mens Warehouse suit who had knee surgury and a facelift...and drives a Hummer. Those guys are a dime a dozen these days.
Give me an underdog....I want to see the "28 Cent Man".... A guy who saves the day...every day from his secret lair (refrigerator box) in the alley behind a supermarket. He doesn't have nifty gadgets....he's got a pink backpack with only one strap and a pickle jar (no, that isn't a pickle inside), and a torn zip lock bag filled with cigarette butts. His secret weapon? - Halitosis and Lyce.
Re:It kind of grows on you (Score:5, Funny)
Someone on a mailing list I used to be on summed it up like this:
New: Run away, they're right behind us!
Old: Run away, they're... oooh, a space casino!
Hot chicks aside, the plots have been intriguing.. (Score:2)
"The basic-cable budget sometimes shows..." (Score:2)
Um... seriously, where did he see this?
Re:"The basic-cable budget sometimes shows..." (Score:2)
I admit I was a hater (Score:2, Insightful)
No Arrested Development? (Score:3, Interesting)
Wrong List.. (Score:2, Interesting)
No Arrested Development? (Score:5, Insightful)
What? No "Stacked" !?!?? (Score:4, Funny)
Love the show, no rewatchability (Score:5, Insightful)
I love the show and catch every episode, but many episodes just don't stand up for a second viewing. Not all of them - 33 and Water I must have watched 5 times the first week after I saw them the first time. Others - eehhhh, not so much.
Someone else mentioned Simpsons. The first season, my roommates and I recorded every episode. As soon as the episode finshed, we would rewind it and watch it again. We must have watched "The Babysitter Bandit" episode 4 times that night.
No show since has had that level of rewatchability, and I doubt another one will.
It is an ex-parrot!!! (Score:5, Informative)
House, MD. (Score:3, Insightful)
If you've never watched it, House MD is an excellent show. The writing is biting and sarcastic, especially from the title character. The acting is excellent, they frequently show wicked CGI surgery goodies, exploding orgrans, pus-spewing ulcers, etc.
House also has a wicked Vicodin habit, his boss is a h4wt13 to boot. It's on tonight on Fox, at 9PM EST.
(No, I do not work for Fox, but will accept per-diem payments if they so choose.)
Re:House, MD. (Score:4, Interesting)
At one point last year the plots started to feel a little formulaic (person nearly dies, repeat until 5 minutes before the end of show, then House figures it out and saves the day) but they have been getting better about that this season. The thing that really makes it a great show is the acting and the snappy dialogue. Also, unlike LOST and 24, the other 2 shows I watch, each epsiode actually has a satisfying resolution instead of unending cliffhangers. (A cliffhanger once in a while is fun, but when it's every week it gets annoying!)
this one time... (Score:5, Funny)
long story short: i can feel battlestar galactica's ownage with all of my body. yes, even my pepe!
I call shenanigans! (Score:3, Funny)
Ok, this is Slashdot so we know the story is false. You watch BSG and post here...and have a girlfriend?
Next time try something more believeable, pal.
Catch "The Colbert Report" (Score:3, Informative)
Best of a Weak Lot (Score:4, Insightful)
Put another way. . . It's worth watching, but there's a lot of room for improvement.
THAT (Score:5, Insightful)
I used to love BSG (Score:4, Interesting)
I'll still watch BSG, but it's not as good as other sci fi shows in recent history.
Hard to believe, some of us are grownups. (Score:4, Insightful)
Less than 50,000 people left, mostly because they had to abandon the ships that had no FTL. Every week something more horrible than the last happens, to the point that they can't even trust the hardware that keeps them alive in the void of space. And there is no understanding their enemy, period.
vs.
Bad scifi settings with an overcamped enemy and everyone trying to spout the next oneliner.
I only hope that the writers are planning BSG far ahead, I don't like making it up as they go along. Pick the number of seasons you want out of it, and figure out a way to end it with a bang. (The humans manage to escape, only a few hundred left on a wilderness planet, worried that the cylons might not all be dead?)
Re:THAT (Score:3, Informative)
Just to drive your point home: If you look carefully enough during the doctor's office scene in the first episode of the Battlestar Galactica miniseries, you will find a small tribute to Whedon's Firefly [whedon.info].
Tiki Bar TV (Score:3, Insightful)
I found the cylon detector (Score:5, Funny)
So, I've only watched the first season so far. Or most of it anyway. For those of you who've seen all the episodes:
Have the humans figured out that if you want to find out if someone is a cylon they can exploit the cylon's major design flaw? You just fuck them doggie style and see if their back starts to glow? Or do they fuck "ride 'em cowboy style" in every episode? Is that how much life in the future will suck? No more doggie style? Then the future humans deserve to be killed off by the cylons.
Anyway, the cylons don't seem like a real formidable enemy, if they designed themselves to be undetectable in every way except, oops, the massive glowing red virgin alarms embedded in their spines.
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:5, Insightful)
Both seasons of Galactica have been great. The second season has been extremely good. Better than the first season. There have been some episodes that are just amazing.
Absolutely the best show on. House would be my number 2.
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2)
It's called a "troll", you get variations of the same comment in every single thread about a TV show, movie or game.
Formula to troll thread about X: "X is not good! People who like X are not smart!" with variations of "not good/smart" such as "sucks", "stupid", etc.
Then, the people who react to this not-so-subtle attack provide the troll with much needed attention and a sense of accomplishment that they can only get from pissing people off
House #2? (Score:2)
My question: Do they really keep medicines in clear plastic boxes with biohazard stickers on them?
Doctor's answer: No, that's just drama.
My question: What's going on?
Med student's answer: House discovered an old journal article that says you can get African Sleeping Sickness from sexual contact.
My Followup: But.. I thought you could only get that from bug bites
Med studen
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2, Insightful)
No seriously... best all around television sci-fi in the last 15 years hands down. I would lean toward Firefly... but obviously it lacked staying power.
Obligatory Joe Dirt Quote--
"You guys got somethin' to say to me? Why don't you say it in the microphone. I got a backup mike right here. Check one two, testing, testing. Yup, they both working and guess what? they don't like no feed back, what's up?"
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:4, Insightful)
Here, some of the best moments--the real high points of the show--occur when people's non-verbal reactions are highlighted by judicious use of close-up or shifting of perspective. You get to watch people make bad decisions on the basis of their emotional reactions at the same time that you sympathize with them, or at least understand why they feel they have to act as they do. It doesn't always hit the mark, but when it does, I think, it's better than anything else on TV.
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:4, Informative)
shakey-cam?
By that do you mean the emulation of battlefield witness filming? First time I saw it I thought it was brilliant. I remember, though I try to forget, seeing the original BSG. This series is so far ahead I can't believe my eyes or luck.
bad acting
Huh?
bad plot
I like stories that mess with my head, stories that are complex, make me think and leave me a bit stunned. BSG does this totally. "Lost" tries to do it but seems simple minded in comparison (though it aint bad). The plot is probably the best part of the series.
Sorry I can't help thinking this has to be troll.
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2)
Atlantis (Score:2)
Stargate Atlantis
seriously though... I've been watching Galactica to try and figure out what it is I don't get that everyone else does... but I don't understand what's so great and that all of geek-dom is lauding this as the next Firefly... And what's not so great about Stargate Atlantis that it hasn't made the cut?
i'm not trying to start a flame-war... I honest
Re:Atlantis (Score:3, Insightful)
As for the water issue, it's been brought up before. Let's presume you're in our solar system, and your technology means you could get from Earth to Mars in a few weeks, you're running out of water, and you need enough for 45000 people. I realize that water molecules are pretty abundant in the solar system, but how many places could you get to where yo
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2)
House.
Not that Battlestar is bad, but House is to TV medical dramas what Sherlock Holmes was to 1890s pulp mystery stories.
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2)
At least 24 or lost don't have dubious (ham handed attempts to deal with or to set forth, I couldn't figure out which) social agendas or try to appeal to the "enlightenment" crowd. Mind you I'd still watch it for that asian chick, my god I'd hit that like a bag full of hammers. Heres the penthouse pic [101lifestyle.com] for those with a pulse.
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2)
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:2)
They're on season 3. The show is what it is.
I agree that the "documentary" film style (which was already done, and better, on Firefly) does get kind of distracting sometimes, especially during moments of weaker dialog, but once the main action sequences get rolling, I tend to not notice, as I get wrapped up in the scene. TMMV
On the whole, I think Galactica is a very
House? (Score:3, Insightful)
1. Person comes in mysteriously ill
2. No one know whats wrong
3. Med students guess some crap but house arrogantly shoots them down
4. House makes an off the wall obscure diagnosis which:
5. (not neccesarily in order) House gets in fi
Re:Could you say that again? (Score:5, Insightful)
In the thirties and forties, acting styles seem to have been more heavily influenced by stage acting and being able to project emotions and actions broadly enough for those in the back rows to relate. The epics of the fifties seemed to require a larger than life stance to live up to the broad material. In the sixties and seventies, the cultural revolutions playing out in society as a whole seem to have seeped into both scripts and acting. Scripts ceased to focus on epics and refocused on individual struggles and personal drama ("I *am* big. It's the *pictures* that got small." - a perfect lament for the death of epics.). Such scripts required a more natural acting style. The eighties brought us action heroes, with their odd mix of broad and natural styles capped with one liners. The nineties brought us blue screen acting, trying to combine any of the above styles whilst playing to nothing.
To return to our topic, Battlestar Galactica is trying very hard to stay with the modern, naturalistic style while incorporating a notion of naturalistic production. The idea for the look of the show is a war documentary. The acting style is as natural as possible and the camera movements are, by and large, an attempt to replicate the feel of a handheld or shoulder mounted camera. Effects shots seek to replicate Gulf War footage and acting tries to replicate human emotional response under massive pressure. For some, this succeeds admirably, feeding the show's atmosphere. For others, it just looks like bad camera work to hide the lack of a budget and mopey, neurotic characters portrayed by actors who run the gamut of emotions from A to B, as Miss Parker would say.
Re:1st Post! (Score:2)
Re:This list is a joke (Score:2)
I happened to be around when my wife was watching the series premiere of Lost, and got sucked in immediately. Far better than Deadwood, which is what I had been watching, and it's the first show in a long time that I would watch while it played, rather than saving it on my Tivo for a few days.
The second season...we
Re:This list is a joke (Score:3, Interesting)
But I think Lost instead has been pretty intresting last few episodes, before that I got the feeling they were just talking amids woods towards the end of first Se
Re:Yeah... yeah... (Score:5, Insightful)
You say that like it's a bad thing. Very few people have had as lasting an impact on the human consciousness as Hitler. As long as the award is for "most notable", and not "most racially tolerant" or "most philanthropic", it was a good choice. You shouldn't just ignore the effect people have on history just because they're evil, genocidal psychopaths - if you ignore them, then you become less equipped to deal with them in the future.
Re:Yeah... yeah... (Score:5, Insightful)
And Hitler wasn't? Did he or did he not influence what was going on in 1939?
Every single Episode of "Andromeda" wipes the floor with the whole Battlestar Craptica crap.
You have got to be joking. Andromeda is weak, deriviative stuff starring a second-string hunk as your standard rebel hero in cliche-land. I can hardly finish an episode even when I'm bored. Galactica breaks ground in so many ways it's not funny. the space flight is more realistic than anything else out there. The ensemble acting is superb. The plot arc raises interesting questions...
Re:TV show of the year ? (Score:3, Insightful)