Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

City-Sized Asteroid to Pass Earth This Fall 340

FiniteLoop sends a collection of links about a city-sized asteroid named Toutatis which will approach - but miss - Earth this September. MSNBC also has a story, and JPL and the Near Earth Object program have more information.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

City-Sized Asteroid to Pass Earth This Fall

Comments Filter:
  • by Allen Zadr ( 767458 ) * <Allen.Zadr@g m a i l . com> on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:24PM (#9056705) Journal

    Where can I get a Celestia [shatters.net] add-on for this asteroid?

  • City sized? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by hot_Karls_bad_cavern ( 759797 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:25PM (#9056717) Journal
    Would it have been that hard to find a moderately well known city to use for the comparison? Paris sized? Or Rose Bud, Arkansas sized?

    Not trolling...just asking :-)
    • Re:City sized? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Caseylite ( 692375 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:30PM (#9056772) Homepage
      A little under 5 square miles, according to the article. Culver City, California Alma, Texas Lexington, South Carolina Pine Ridge, South Carolina Lake Worth, Florida In other words, a small city.
    • Taken from the JPL site: "Toutatis is about 4.6 kilometers long"
    • Re:City sized? (Score:5, Informative)

      by PopCulture ( 536272 ) <PopCulture AT hotmail DOT com> on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:34PM (#9056821)
      Toutatis is about 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide (4.6 by 2.4 kilometers).

      So its probably closer in size to downtown Rose Bud, Arkansas (certainly excluding the busteling suburban Rose Bud outlying areas)
    • Re:City sized? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by metlin ( 258108 ) * on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:34PM (#9056823) Journal
      Its quite unlikely to be as big as Paris or any other bigger city - the article clearly states its the size of a *small* city.

      On Sept. 29, 2004 an asteroid the size of a small city will make the closest known pass of such a very large space rock anytime this century.

      The article also says that -

      Toutatis is about 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide (4.6 by 2.4 kilometers).

      Therefore, I think a small town would rather be more appropriate than a small city. Most cities today cover atleast tens of miles, if not hundreds. But then again, its relative.

      What scares me is the following line from the site -

      Researchers can't predict far enough into the future to rule out Toutatis ever slamming into Earth, so it is listed officially as a Potentially Hazardous Asteroid. NASA says it won't hit for at least the next six centuries.

      Six centuries is an awfully short time, and maybe encouraging space programs and building stations outside of Earth is probably a good idea.
      • Re:City sized? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by jonman_d ( 465049 ) <nemilar&optonline,net> on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:37PM (#9056875) Homepage Journal

        What scares me is the following line from the site...[snip]
        Six centuries is an awfully short time...


        You've got to figure that if we can, with today's technology, figure out its path for the next 600 years, then by that time has elapsed, we'll probably be able to figure out its path for at least 1000 years. Even if we don't advance that far, 600 years is still plenty of time to figure out a plan for saving the planet (although something tells me that, the way the human race/governments work, we'll wind up waiting until the last 20 years, anyhow).
        • Re:City sized? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by metlin ( 258108 ) * on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:43PM (#9056956) Journal
          Ofcourse! Actually, you are quite right in the last count.

          Figuring out the path is not the issue, doing something about it is. Unfortunately, even if the space organizations did figure out (I do not know if they have already figured this out or not, yet), there is no guarantee that they will make it public for a while.

          Nothing better to stir up those religious zealots saying that in FooBar years the world is going to come to an end. And even the saner public would most certainly be quite paranoid if such a prediction were to come to pass.

          That is what makes it far worse than actually knowing about it - a large segment of the population may still remain ignorant and oblivious to this. And given the brilliant red-tape that exists in most government agencies, I really wonder if we would be doing anything about it (except, ofcourse, fund a bunch of religious institutions and proclaim that some voice in the sky is going to save us all).

        • Re:City sized? (Score:3, Interesting)

          With my somewhat limited knowledge of orbital mechanics (i.e I've taken classical mechanics and played KSpaceDuel a bunch), it seems the best way to handle this is not to try to move the asteroid on approach, but to propell it further away from earth on it's outward leg of orbit. Say we knew asteroid $FOO was going to strike earth in 2020, 5 orbits from now. we would use far less fuel nudging it faster as it left past Earth (and hence into a larger orbit) than trying to decelerate and/or modify the orbit of
          • Well, given that this thred was started by a superconductivity guy, it seems only natural to ask, how about inducing an itty bitty (relatively) current across said asteroid if it is indeed mostly iron (some aren't, ya know) and try to get the induced magnetic field aligned to get it to shift path within the solar system's ambient fields? After all, we're talking about a LONG period of time and a tiny shift in direction. I'm too lazy to do the numbers, but seems to me that rockets of any sort might be a need
      • Yup (Score:5, Funny)

        by fiannaFailMan ( 702447 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:44PM (#9056958) Journal
        The dinosaurs are extinct cos they didn't have a space programme.
        • Re:Yup (Score:5, Funny)

          by Geoffreyerffoeg ( 729040 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @06:30PM (#9057425)
          How do you know they are extinct? Maybe they had a space program, left for another plnet, and let the Earth be hit by the asteroid. There'd've been enough bodies of already dead dinosaurs for us to find.
          • Your post got me to thinking - if the dinosaurs had been sentient, what evidence would they have left behind that they had built cities, space programs etc.? Would a reptilian Vesuvius survive for 60 million years? Would we recognize it as such if we found it?
            • by dustmite ( 667870 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @07:53PM (#9058350)

              Your post got me to thinking - if the dinosaurs had been sentient

              Aren't you mixing the concepts of "sentient" and "intelligent" a bit? It seems quite plausible (and perhaps even reasonable to assume) that many less intelligent Earth animals than us (e.g. dogs or pigs or elephants) are sentient, but they don't have the intelligence required for creating complex industrialised civilisations.

              Hmm .. if we assume they had built cities or perhaps even small villages, how much evidence of those structures would remain today? Probably nothing if they had reached about the same level of technological advancement that humans were in the year 1900. Even big things like pyramids will probably be long gone (unless buried?). Now we have things like plastics and huge landfills, yet even most modern plastics degrade in "only" tens of millions of years. If humans vanished off the face of the Earth today, I think our buildings and other structures will be long gone in 60 million years, even a long-developed area such as London will probably have been reclaimed by trees, plants, grass etc. However, we will definitely have permanently altered virtually all of the planet's ecosystems, that will be evident. And certain spots where there are high densities of pollutants (e.g. plastics or chemical pollutants) will probably still have higher densities of those things, leaving evidence of their locations. The crumbled rubble of huge cities like London or New York will, if buried over time, probably leave some sort of permanent layer of sediment with "interesting" chemical make-up.

              So that's a weird thought, if dinosaurs had reached 1900-levels of technology, and lived in cities and villages and had a global trade system, there might actually be virtually no evidence of it now. Or maybe I'm wrong, haven't thought about it much.

              • by ColaMan ( 37550 ) on Wednesday May 05, 2004 @05:48AM (#9061433) Journal
                Well, presuming that they advanced to (or beyond) a bronze age, they'd need minerals that you'd most easily get by mining and refining, and the evidence of previous mining of a mineral deposit would be easily spotted by a geologist 60 million years later (a lot of strata disruption,shattered rock indicating the use of explosives, trace mineralisation with no "body" in the centre... etc.)
                • You're assuming that their civilisation would be like modern Western civilisation. Why would they necessarily be doing mining on such a scale as to need explosives? Would they even need that many minerals? I mean, we generally don't, only minimally so for industrial uses, and who is to say that dinosaurs would have cared about jewelry? You can have farming, villages, housing and trade without minerals, and with only a minimum of metals (yes you can, study history). African civilisations have been forging me

          • Re:Yup (Score:5, Funny)

            by Lord_Slepnir ( 585350 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @08:51PM (#9058848) Journal
            THey're not extinct, they're just hiding behind your funiture.
      • Re:City sized? (Score:4, Interesting)

        by penguinoid ( 724646 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:51PM (#9057052) Homepage Journal
        > What scares me is the following line from the site -

        >>Researchers can't predict far enough into the future to rule out Toutatis ever
        >>slamming into Earth, so it is listed officially as a Potentially Hazardous
        >>Asteroid. NASA says it won't hit for at least the next six centuries.

        Yes, the solar system is actually chaotic. It is only slightly chaotic, and orbital periods are very long, so I doubt that this is much of a concern.

        BTW, if one ever does reach an orbit that will collide with us, we will have something useful to do with all those nukes, no?
      • Its quite unlikely to be as big as Paris or any other bigger city

        What about Paris, Texas? [paristexas.com] :)
      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • Re:City sized? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Saeger ( 456549 ) <farrellj@nosPAM.gmail.com> on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @06:29PM (#9057408) Homepage
        Six centuries is an awfully short time

        Hahahahahah! 600 years? Not a lot of time? ... AhhhhHahahhahaahah!!!

        I've got your short-term & long-term [kurzweilai.net] right here.

        --

        • Re:City sized? (Score:3, Interesting)

          by metlin ( 258108 ) *
          Thank you for the link! I have read Kurzweil's Age of Spiritual Machines, where he discusses something like this.

          Well, but I said that 600 years is short because -

          1. We need to get off this rock at a short notice, not just a few of us but most of us.

          2. We would need to either have good space stations that can sustain us (short term) or terra-form a nearby planet (within our reach) or find a way to travel to another sector of the galaxy containing planets that are Earth-like. Remember, we will be going aw
          • Re:City sized? (Score:4, Interesting)

            by Vellmont ( 569020 ) on Wednesday May 05, 2004 @05:40AM (#9061389) Homepage
            Why would you teraform a lifeless rock and move billions of people to it if you can just move the asteroid a bit and avoid it hitting the earth? 600 years is plenty of time to develop the technology to do this, and enough time to do it slowly (minimum energy expenditure). I've heard some ideas that merely changing the light reflectivity of the rock would change its orbit.
      • by I don't want to spen ( 638810 ) on Wednesday May 05, 2004 @10:41AM (#9063428) Journal
        You mean in 600 years, everyone reading this could be dead?
    • by stevesliva ( 648202 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:38PM (#9056894) Journal
      It is definitely the size of several dozen libraries of congress and will pass withing a few moon units. However, scientists can predict its path to the less than the width of a human hair, so do not fear.
    • Hey, it could have been much worse. Just be thankful it isn't Oprah-sized.
    • Heck, forget about cities... this asteroid is 25 times larger (in two dimensions) than an entire country! That is, if the country in question happens to be Holy See (Vatican City), recognized as a separate country.

      Or, it's just slightly smaller than Tuvalu [cia.gov].
  • by Caseylite ( 692375 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:26PM (#9056720) Homepage
    Someone call Bruce Willis!
  • Ironic name (Score:3, Informative)

    by AdmiralNacho ( 472780 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:26PM (#9056729)
    "The only thing us Gauls have to fear is the sky falling on our heads"
  • Catch that puppy (Score:5, Interesting)

    by nizo ( 81281 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:27PM (#9056736) Homepage Journal
    I always thought it would be cool to catch one of these asteroids and plunk it into a nice orbit for scavanging or using as a huge horkin' space station. However nudging it into orbit would be bad if you misjudged and plunked it down on someone (which in turn could be a great way to get rid of somebody you don't like and make it look like an accident, but that is another story).
    • Tie a very long very large cable to it in a couple million years in order to move the earth slightly away from the sun, thus adjusting for global warming.
    • That would be a good plan. Put a naquadah-heavy asteroid on a collision course with Earth.


      No wait... that's been done already

    • by tunabomber ( 259585 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:38PM (#9056879) Homepage
      President Bush: Well, a city-size asteroid has landed on Fallujah. It's so sad but so conv- I mean what are the odds!?
    • It would take an awfully long time to catch it. You would have to use the slingshot effect to slow it down several times, and to do even that would require an awful lot of rocket power to do. Probably best to use an ion engine to aim it and slingshot it from mars to earth where it gets caught (you can slow it down by aiming it so it cuts in front of a planet and the planet's gravity slows it). However, it would take years to reach earth from mars.

      It would be great for mining though, as material in space
    • Why don't you just make a million dollars without having to pay taxes, or carve a boat from a block of wood?

      In case you don't know how to do either of those, I'll tell you [regards to Monty Python, etc]

      1) Make a million dollars. Don't pay taxes.
      2) Get a block of wood. Carve away all the bits that don't look like a boat.

      Nothing personal, nizo, I am just whoring for a funny moderation, but basically what you have just said is slight variation on a slashdot meme:

      1) ?
      2) use the asteroid for cool stu

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:28PM (#9056742)
    But, they fail to mention that it is of such size as to have sufficient gravity that when it passes, it will rip the oceans from the face of the earth and carry them off into space.

    All you doubters are gonna be mighty thirsty. It's going to be a hot dry 2005!
  • But miss!?! (Score:5, Funny)

    by LqqkOut ( 767022 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:28PM (#9056745) Journal
    > Will approach - but miss - Earth.

    ACK! "But Miss" sounds like a negative statement. I, for one, wouldn't feel the least bit sad if we're excluded from the city-sized-meteor-strikes-planet team.

  • Hmmm (Score:5, Funny)

    by sv25 ( 773540 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:28PM (#9056747)
    All of these misses... Geez, the universe sure does have bad aim!
  • by DrugCheese ( 266151 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:28PM (#9056751)
    Would they tell us if it was going to hit? Why wouldn't they? Why would they?

    • I think it's a very interesting question.

      If "they" tell us, they can be sure that the whole world is going to break down: riots, suicides, etc... pretty much a total collapse of social structure.

      The reasons not to? First of all, it's mean (unethical). Second of all, what if letting the problem be known could potentially help solve it?

      I think that, in this case, if I were "they" and it was absolutely known and confirmed that impact would kill everyone on the planet, I would go ahead and let the news out
    • Well, the most likely situation is that *someone* would tell us. It only takes one, and who's going to care if they get fired for telling people the world is going to end in a few months?
    • by cexshun ( 770970 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:39PM (#9056901) Homepage
      Hmmm. An interesting question. However, with all the civilian observatories out there with university astrophyisists(sp?), one would imagine the information would be leaked if it was going to hit. You know there's be some hippy assistant to a university astronomer saying, "The good people of Earth deserve to know!" And, with all this publicity, I'd say every telescope in the world is trained in on it right now. And, even if they kept it quiet, it'd be hard to miss something this size and proximity to Earth, even by an amateur astronomer.
      • And, even if they kept it quiet, it'd be hard to miss something this size and proximity to Earth, even by an amateur astronomer.

        What would be bad is if the amateur astronomer agreed and didn't release the news. How large a bribe would needed to keep them quite? How many people look up at the night sky and pay attention? Could you tell that a little tiny dot was coming at us? Could you tell that it wasn't an airplane or helicopter?

        I can't. During daylight I could tell that it was an airplane. At night ti
    • Yes, exactly, why would they (the idiosyncratic "them")?

      Depending on the severity of the strike, the response will always be governed by Elitist Cataclysmic Logic:

      SAVE US FIRST AND SCREW EVERYBODY ELSE.

      Any strike from an object detected by telescopes will be particulary severe ... you can depend upon at least a 10MT explosion in the lower atmosphere. But with objects sized like Toutatis, the strike will be a groundripper in the 100s of MTs.

      Such an event means that stock portfolios are likely to
  • City-sized? (Score:3, Funny)

    by morcheeba ( 260908 ) * on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:30PM (#9056766) Journal
    On Sept. 29, 2004 an asteroid the size of a small city ...
    Toutatis is about 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide (4.6 by 2.4 kilometers).


    Well, most small cities are about 30 feet thick (about 10 feet of plumbing underground, plus a two story building above-ground), so I'm not so worried.
  • Cause Mishaps? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Kjuib ( 584451 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:30PM (#9056770) Homepage Journal
    Is this going to set stuff off? The Ocean Tides? Car Alarms?
  • by Anonymous Coward
    ...Anna Nicole, but was recently renamed.
  • The real quetstion (Score:5, Interesting)

    by thebra ( 707939 ) * on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:31PM (#9056779) Homepage Journal
    is to nuke or nudge. [space.com]
  • by douthat ( 568842 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:34PM (#9056819)
    We've seen Toutatis before:

    1989, 1992, 2004

    http://www.iki.rssi.ru/solar/eng/toutatis.htm

    Oh! it looks like this headline will come every four years... just enough time for people to forget :)

    Check it out [wikipedia.org]
    • Wow... (Score:3, Funny)

      by sczimme ( 603413 )

      Just like presidential elections!

      (I kid, of course: there's no way to escape election hoopla - carefully distinguished from useful content - for at least 2 of the 4 intervening years.)
  • by Walkiry ( 698192 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:35PM (#9056834) Homepage
    As in Bob The Angry Flower:

    http://www.angryflower.com/astero.gif [angryflower.com]
  • Cheap new ISS.... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by isotope23 ( 210590 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:35PM (#9056836) Homepage Journal
    Too bad we cant capture it and put it in a lagrange point.

    Makes more sense to do it that way than shuttle all the crap up from earth....
    • by dsanfte ( 443781 )
      Do you have any idea how much energy would be required to steer/stop an object of that size? It would be unimaginable.
      • Re:Cheap new ISS.... (Score:3, Informative)

        by sbaker ( 47485 )
        Well, let's see. (Apologies for rough math!)

        It's roughly a cylinder 2.9 miles long x 1.5 miles in cross-sectional diameter. That's a volume of about 21 cubic kilometers...21 giga-cubic-meters. A cubic meter of basalt rock weighs in at 2800kg under earth gravity...so we are up to something like 5.5 tera-newtons of mass.

        We know that:

        Force = mass x accelleration
        dist = accelleration x time x time / 2

        What saves you when you are trying to move something like this is that 'time-squared' term. Doubl
        • Teaching... (Score:3, Informative)

          by ballpoint ( 192660 )
          For physics sake, dude, get your dimensions right.

          weighs in at 2800kg under earth gravity ?
          5.5 tera-newtons of mass ?
          half a newton/meter of force ?
          car engine doing a couple of hundred Newton/meters ?

          weight (a mass under acceleration) is measured in Newton (kg.m/s/s, not kg)
          mass in kg (not in newton)
          force in Newton (not in newton/meter)
          torque in Nm (Newton times meter, not Newtons per meter)

          Explain what the torque of a car engine has to do with moving an asteroid, unless you have found a place

  • by TopShelf ( 92521 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:35PM (#9056839) Homepage Journal
    OMG, is there enough time to make the TV movie???
  • by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) ( 613870 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:36PM (#9056851) Journal
    Are they sure it's completely flat?
  • When you need him. I cannot live without my sensationalist doomsday reporting! What is it with this fact-based rational approach to asteroids!
    Bruce Willis save us!
  • welcome our speedingly fast galatic dust and ice overlords
  • God of War (Score:5, Informative)

    by sssmashy ( 612587 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:40PM (#9056914)

    Asterix and Obelix fans may recall that Toutatis, a name frequently invoked by those indomitable Gauls, is in fact the ancient French god of war, growth and prosperity.

    Invoking Toutatis during battle was supposed to bring about certain victory for the pre-Christian French warriors. Which is why it is such an appropriate moniker for a comet that appears just once every 500 years... ;-)

    • Re:God of War (Score:2, Interesting)

      by zboubi ( 776969 )
      Also note that the Gauls often feared that the sky might fall on their head. Let's just hope they were wrong !
    • Or, as Chief Vitalstatistix would say:

      "By Toutatis! The Sky is falling on our heads!"

    • Actually (Score:2, Informative)

      by ziondreams ( 760588 ) *
      Actually [slashdot.org], it appears every 4 years.
    • Of course, being a French asteroid, we can be sure that it would never hit us on account of
      the enevitable asteroid strike.

      oh hell, I have karma to burn...

      Of course, being a French asteroid, it will never hit us, just smell bad as it goes by. :-D

      or, similarly...

      Of course, being a French asteroid, it will never actually hit us because it would simply surrender once we declared war.
    • Re:God of War (Score:5, Interesting)

      by This is outrageous! ( 745631 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @06:27PM (#9057386)
      Behind the name : [astrosurf.com]

      By 1989, I had already started numbering Apollo objects using gaulish gods. One which I had not used was Toutatis since I thought it was an invention of Goscinny [w3imagis.imag.fr] and Uderzo [w3imagis.imag.fr], authors of the well known comic book series "Les aventures d'Asterix". There are several dozens sites about this comic book series, you may want to look at few of them :


      One of their constant saying is "By Toutatis", another one is that their only fear is that the sky may fall onto their heads.
      I discovered my ignorance of gaulish culture when I learned that Toutatis was ( or had been ) a real God. I also learned that the citation in Asterix was not a joke, but that it had been reported by some historians of Alexander the great who had met some gaulish warriors ( who had once invaded Italy and Great Britain ).
      One of the first thing we learned about Toutatis was its record low inclination. This meant that it is indeed ( in a remote future ) a good candidate to fall onto our heads. The name stuck almost immediately at the telescope when I proposed it. Toutatis, also sometimes spelled "teutates" is a totemic deity, to which human sacrifices were made.
      Don't be misled, very few french persons do know about the cruel god Toutatis, but most will talk to you about Asterix and his friends if you come to swear " By Toutatis ! ", provided you get the right (i.e. french) accent...

  • by Saeger ( 456549 ) <farrellj@nosPAM.gmail.com> on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:45PM (#9056973) Homepage
    A "city-sized" asteroid is about the size of:

    • 0.01 Texas'
    • 2000 Rock of Gibraltar's
    • 5000 Library Of Congress's
    • 10000 Empire State buildings
    • 20000 Football Stadiums
    • 150000 Houses
    • 300000 Semi Trucks
    • 2300000 "New Beetle's"
    • 2500000 VW Bugs
    • 30 Oprah's || CowboyNeal's
    (unit conversions came out of my ass just, like most stats)

    --

  • by tttonyyy ( 726776 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:46PM (#9056990) Homepage Journal
    ...depending on your frame of reference. Perhaps they're just relieved at missing our planet? :)

    Obviously I've been spending too much time playing this [fi.muni.cz].

  • by MosesJones ( 55544 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @05:49PM (#9057023) Homepage

    And another swing and a miss by the Kuiper belt, the Kuiper belt is batting a .0000001 ERA against small blue planets over the course of this aeon. Of course the last hit that wasn't called foul was a grand-slam homer which cleared the field for a couple of seasons.
  • So, they say that it will pass Earth this fall, and that chances of it hitting Earth are incredibly small. Like 1000000:1. So in the summer they'll say that chances are more like 10000:1. By the time it will be week or two till the pass they'll say the odds are 100:1.

    Wait, where did I read this? Right, it's about time to refresh this cute Niven piece ;)

    Robert
  • by Greyfox ( 87712 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @06:29PM (#9057406) Homepage Journal
    If it were going to hit us? They probably wouldn't tell anyone, since they can't do anything about it anyway. You'd just see a suspicious number of politicians planning to spend some vacation time in "our underground bunker in the mountains."
  • by Ralph Spoilsport ( 673134 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @07:27PM (#9058087) Journal
    And you're here with me in San Francisco, this is what would happen, according to the impact calculator: [arizona.edu]

    Thermal Radiation:

    Time for maximum radiation:
    3.29 seconds after impact

    Visible fireball radius:
    8.4 km = 5.2 miles
    The fireball appears 2.4 times larger than the sun

    Thermal Exposure:
    1.19 x 105 Joules/m2

    Duration of Irradiation:
    77 seconds

    Radiant flux (relative to the sun):
    1.5

    Seismic Effects:

    The major seismic shaking will arrive at approximately 161.0 seconds.
    Richter Scale Magnitude: 9.1 (This is greater than any shaking in recorded history)
    Mercalli Scale Intensity at a distance of 805 km: IV. Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of heavy trucks; or sensation of a jolt like a heavy ball striking the walls. Standing motor cars rock. Windows, dishes, doors rattle. Glasses clink. Crockery clashes. In the upper range of IV wooden walls and frame creak.
    V. Felt outdoors; direction estimated. Sleepers wakened. Liquids disturbed, some spilled. Small unstable objects displaced or upset. Doors swing, close, open. Shutters, pictures move. Pendulum clocks stop, start, change rate.

    Ejecta:

    The ejecta will arrive approximately 436.0 seconds after the impact.

    Average Ejecta Thickness:
    2.7 cm = 1.04 inches

    Mean Fragment Diameter:
    1.4 mm = 0.0561 inches

    Air Blast:

    The air blast will arrive at approximately 2683.3 seconds.
    Peak Overpressure:
    39729.6 Pa = 0.3973 bars = 5.6416 psi
    Max wind velocity:
    73.5 m/s = 164.5 mph Sound Intensity:
    92 dB (May cause ear pain)

    Damage Description:

    Wood frame buildings will almost completely collapse. Glass windows will shatter. Up to 90 percent of trees blown down; remainder stripped of branches and leaves.

    So: In a nut shell:
    the asteroid smacks LA. A great cheer is heard round the world - that idoitic show Friends is finally off the air, and now nature is here to make sure it never sees re-runs. A fitting punishment, much like that space byport problem meted out for Really Bad Poetry. So, all in all, the erasure of Los Angeles isn't such a bad thing, in the greater scheme of things - no more Meg Ryan movies, Bruce and Demi vapourised - aaaah - not so bad at all!

    The problem is:
    on the horizon would be a largish fireball, and things here in SF would get really warm for about a minute or two. Then 2 minutes and 41 seconds later, an earthquake hits, the likes of which makes 1906 look like a joyride. Then about 5 and a half minutes later gravel comes flying out of the sky at supersonic speed. Then about 45 minutes later the wind hits at 165 miles per hour, pretty much scouring the bay area of anything left alive.

    So, while it would completely wipe LA off the map (YAY!!!) and leave a crater 35 miles wide ( |{3vv|_ !!! ) it will first lightly toast (boo!) then pulverise with hypersonic gravel (EEEK!!) then shake to pieces (Bad. Reeeally Bad) and then blow away (Suckage!) the Bay Area.

    Therefore, it is incumbent on the Bay Area to find a way to stop such a rock from hitting the earth, because, as we all know, such disasters only hit two cities: Tokyo and LA. And given that Tokyo is being continuously reduced to rubble by those giant lizards, Moths and Turtles, it's the rocks we have to watch out for.

    RS

  • by B5_geek ( 638928 ) on Tuesday May 04, 2004 @09:35PM (#9059208)
    Howdy all,
    Reading this article got me thinking about how often we hear about these 'near-misses' well odds are we had just as many 'near-misses' for the last 100 years.

    Well I witnessed a very unusual event about 21 years ago.

    I was "camping" in our back yard with a school-chum (we were about 10 years old at the time) and late in the night (11pm - 1am Eastern) We saw in the south-west sky (Southern Ontario near Detroit, MI) a bright orange object. (Bright orange because it was obviously in the semi-shadow of the Earth, bent light thing)

    It was about the size of a soccer-ball (held 4' away) and very high in the sky. We saw it BOUNCE twice and disappear over the western horizon.

    No flames from the atmosphere, but it was covered with impact craters. (It looked like a mini version of the moon) Very cool stuff that I will never forget.

    Who/Where/How can I bring this to (vague information and all) to find out exactly what it was? I don't remember hearing anything about it in the news the next day, but I was probably more interested in GI Joe.

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...