A New Tack In Search Engine Formulation 99
An unnamed correspondent writes: "PC World reports that 'big-shot Web directories such as Yahoo and LookSmart' are missing thousands of the best links, which a new startup HotLinks has in in their directory by building it from people's bookmarks." This sounds like a smart idea (building from people's own bookmarks), but is it doomed to create in-breeding of links? That is, in a search engine based on bookmarks, will they be able to get enough "new blood"?
Re:Static pages (Score:1)
Strike that. Reverse that. Since they're static, you're not likely to hit them very often, thus making you less likely to remember the URL, thus making you more likely to bookmark it.
The sites that I hit daily, or even weekly, I can easily remember the URL. In fact, I've gotten to the point where it's so automatic for me to type in the URL for some sites that when asked what's the address for a site I visit often, I actually have to mentally type out the URL to remember (it's more finger memory than brain memory, I guess). The only dynamic pages in my bookmarks are to my dnet stats and the local weather page. The rest are static.
I'm pretty certain that this is where the value is going to be located.
hymie
Another alternative is Copernic (Score:1)
Basically they offer web searchs based on categories with each category using some of 80 different search engines to aggregate a result, with categories such as :
- programming
- tech news (searches sites such as slashdot and the register)
- games
- file search
- computer security (searches astalavista for ex)
- humour
- mp3
- e-mail addresses
- shopping
- news
- newgroups
- the Web(America),the Web(UK),the Web(Mongolian Goat Herders etc-well you get the picture)
Best of all it can filter out all the dead links before giving you its search results
It use engines such as Google,The Open Directory Project, Alta Vista, Hot Bot etc as new search engines come along they are available to use when you next update Copernic via the net.
They sell a commercial version but that differs only in the ability to cutomize more and do get rid of the annoying adverts whilst your surfing
If you want the commercial version just download the free one and get a license number from astalavista [astalavista.box.sk] , register your software via the menu and lo and behold you have now got the Pro version.
Re:Geek self-referential belief system (Score:1)
I agree whole-heartedly with the newspaper comment. I also like finding articles that I am not looking for. That is why I still get print periodicals.
Luckialy most search engines are excelent at finding pages you aren't interested in. Truly one of the joys of the web, and I don't mean that sarcasticly!
Re:Most linked order (Score:2)
Hotlinks does not search content... (Score:2)
If you search for "four score and seven years ago" (the beginning of American president Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, for our international visitors), you get bupkus. Nothing. Any other search engine will turn up the Gettysburg Address in the first ten links.
The first problem with this is that it requires too much pre-knowledge. I have to know that it is called the "Gettysburg Address" or get lucky in that someone might have titled their page or link "four score and seven years ago." If I was an Iranian student studying American slavery and somebody passed along the first few lines of the speech as something I should be aware of, Hotlinks is of no help whatsoever.
The second problem with this is that, in looking at my own links, I see that the titles of the links are often completely irrelevant, inaccurate or vague. What use is a search based on page titles? Even Yahoo returns normal search engine results when it doesn't find anything in its own directory.
Finally, if I want someplace to store my links, I'll use my own web site.
Thank you (Score:1)
I know, I know, off topic. Had to be said.
It depends ... (Score:3)
after all, what kinds of links would you get from everyone who worked at Microsoft? or Sun? Would there naturally be a corporate bias in the culture.
or a regional bias, or whatever....
what you would probably need would also be some rating by the internet age of the person (how long have the been online) because the people who have been around awhile probably have a more useful collection.
and I also wonder how different this is from advertiser tracking of where you go by cookies.
the best combination might be to combine cookie tracking with an internet search engine database. but there are drawbacks here as well.
[shrug]
I'm unimpressed (Score:2)
All of which suggests to me that their attempt to eliminate human effort will produce a lot of old garbage (I don't clean up my bookmarks; do you?) and the obvious set of well known corporate sites.
Backflip (Score:3)
Re:Nonstandard HTML (Score:1)
spiders are better (Score:2)
In my opinion spiders are better. A spider can go out on the web and get the latest links. Then it can heep them up to date. Google does this and so far they seem to have a very good search engine. They can also (I think they do) use 'clicks' to rank the links bringing the most clicked upon links to the top of the search results. Giving you what people click on most in the search results. NBCi does this too with there global brain technology (whatever that is).
I don't want a lot, I just want it all!
Flame away, I have a hose!
Re:Searching the web (Score:1)
BIGGER SECURITY HOLE (Score:4)
Do a search for "password"--some of these geniuses have their banking and etrade usernames/passwords up there. Email and xdrive passwords are abundant.
Also, an awful lot of these guys look at illegal pr0n. These bookmarks are right next to the ones showing their personal home pages with pictures of the wife and kids. The FBI and a divorce lawyer or two are gonna have a field day with this.
I tried to contact one of the guys with his bank account open, but, for security reasons, his email addy is not on his profile...
real smart website they got there.
Just tried their service... (Score:1)
I don't like their cokkies, with my IP inside, even @home with dynamic IP...glad that my ~/.crashicator/cookies is set 400. But wait, it has changed to 600....:-(
Think I have to change it with chattr, to prevent Netscape from doing this...
Michael
Re:bookmarks everywhere... (Score:2)
Re:The Jukebox Phenomenon (Score:1)
Re:A _big_ security hole (Score:1)
Re:BIGGER SECURITY HOLE (Score:1)
Re:Most linked order (Score:1)
Re:Geek self-referential belief system (Score:1)
I think hot links would be an excellent complement to the number of search engines I use on a daily basis.
Stop torturing yourself with these incessant thoughts on psychosociological quandaries and get laid!
people are starving to death out there somewhere! obsessing over things like this seems to be a bit extreme...
Lateral Discovery? (Score:2)
This would be highly cool for finding eclectic stuff. Kinda like, well, the lateral discovery in Napster.
hymie
blank page... (Score:2)
Danny, who still prefers Netscape 3.04
Re:Combination (Score:1)
A _big_ security hole (Score:5)
my username at slashdot is totally different.
Guess how?
www.slashdot.org/users.pl?op=userlogin&.. etc was
a link on that site, enabling people to easily gather username/passwords.
(Offcourse, bookmarking such a link is a _bad_ idea, it even says so on the login page)
Bookmarks (Score:1)
recognizing the obvious (Score:1)
Re:I don't see a problem if... (Score:1)
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIt
Hey HOTLINKS, fix this huge disservice! (Score:1)
Re:Screw Yahoo (Score:1)
Has anyone tried it yet? (Score:1)
Not a unique idea (Score:1)
Another dmoz like project is MOVEO.com [moveo.com] but its just getting off the ground so I'm not clear on how it works yet. But aparently everyone who registers can set up their own virtual portal, and these links are then shared by anyone using Moveo.
It doesn't take a lot (Score:1)
The fact is that some people will have some links in their bookmarks that the search engine would otherwise never have been able to find, or at least enable it to find those sites sooner.
Yahoo vs. Google (Score:1)
OP could have just been saying "dmoz [dmoz.org] is better than Yahoo!'s directory."
--Bouillabaisse: It's all the rage among trolls! Here's a recipe [provence-beyond.com]
Re:Combination (Score:2)
FWIW, we are entirely Linux based too.
bookmarks and usefulness (Score:1)
That cool new dancing hamster page... (Score:1)
But by now, you probably think Hampsterdance is annoying. Very annoying. If so, go play Hampsterdeath [8m.com], a game based on the Grand Unified Whack-A-Mole Engine for *nix, DOS, and Windows.
Re:Not in my bookmarks (Score:1)
Next, on the bias towards default bookmarks, any one that bases anything on the frequency of the occurence of URLs in bookmarks probably does as we do and filter out the default bookmarks so it's a non-issue.
Re:the power is not the search engine (Score:1)
Re:BIGGER SECURITY HOLE (Score:1)
enough said.
Novel isn't necessarily better (Score:1)
Combination (Score:3)
Great idea (Score:1)
people volunteer the bookmarks (Score:2)
A good thing I think, when your M$ OS blows its top it is the one thing that people forget to backup.
Oh Boy.... (Score:5)
Well it's an intriguing idea at any rate (Score:3)
I mean, crawling the web for publicly accessable sites is one thing, crawling my data to see where I like go is another.
Carnivore: The search engine.
It would certainly come up with the most popular sites though. I'm not even sure that is a good thing. Anybody out there got any bookmarks that they wouldn't want their mom to see? What if it turns out we ALL have that one and it comes up on mom's search? Of course mom might be there already herself and dosn't want US to know.
On the whole it seems like a "Not a best of the web, but at least very popular with the masses" type of deal and otherwise of limited use a real research tool. Part of the new " Power shopping on the web" paradigm.
Geek self-referential belief system (Score:4)
It's like being able to choose what things you want to appear in your own daily newspaper - it's inherently flawed because the most interesting things one encounters are often those one didn't expect to be interesting.
Similarly the very best things to find with a search engine are those things which are not common knowledge. The job of a decent search engine is to flush out gems, not popular opinion.
bookmarks everywhere... (Score:2)
I *like to type w*w*w*.*s*l*a*s*h*d*o*t*.*o*r*g once in w while, and since i constantly use different computers i never got to use bookmarks really. some are in my head and as long as they can not read my memories, they're pretty lost...
Comment removed (Score:3)
Pffft... Buzzwords (Score:1)
Link gathering... (Score:1)
--
my evaluation (Score:4)
As far as regular search engines go, it was much faster to get google to crawl my site and list it than anything run by, inktomi, altavista, or northernlight. I am very happy with google.
As far as directories go, Yahoo lists two of the 7 sites that I maintain. I have managed to get dmoz listings for 6 of the 7, two of which, i didn't submit myself.
This new directory only appears to have one of my sites, and at a URL that has been inactive for almost two years at this point. I'll have to see how easy it is to get stuff listed, but so far I am not impressed.
Not in my bookmarks (Score:1)
As for staying on topic: I don't know bookmarking habits op most people, but actually 50% of my bookmarks are sites which I saw but did not have the time to explore. The days I have time, I explore the sites decide if they are interesting enough to keep and put them in a bookmark folder that represents a category (like "Humour", "Computers", "TV", "Programming" etc...) I think that a search-engine based on bookmarks has potential, but I fear that most people do not organize their bookmarks well enough and that many many links in it will be out of date.
As a final note: remember that such an engine will be very biased to the "default" bookmarks that are provided by the browser manufacturers. I know most slashdotters clear those on first sight, but a normal user often doens't bother and just adds his own to the existing ones. I saw some bookmarks/favourites that took up the whole screen when openend. They mostly don't even know how to remove broken bookmarks, sad but true.
The weakness of such search engines is that it relies on human input and we are far from perfect, aren't we?
Re:I don't see a problem if... (Score:1)
Google already does it? (Score:3)
Re:Google already does it? (Score:1)
--
I invented search engines (Score:1)
Re:blank page... (Score:1)
webwasher is a nice little program, check it [webwasher.com] out. It does a good job of filtering
Who bookmarks sites anyway? (Score:2)
I don't know about you people, but I don't often use bookmarks. www.slashdot.org, www.userfriendly.org and www.pointlesswasteoftime.com are the sites I think are good. They aren't bookmarked; I can type the URL faster than I can fiddle with those stupid bookmarks. The sites I bookmark are those that look a little interesting, but either aren't good enough for memorisation or have a long, confusing URL like http://www.rollanet.org/~joeh/10ghz/n6gn_article.
Michael
...another comment from Michael Tandy.
But I don't have any bookmarks! (Score:2)
---
Re:The Jukebox Phenomenon - Napster (Score:1)
I've also found that the only Roger McGuinn song is My Back Pages from Bob-Fest and the only Jimmie Dale Gilmore song is the duet with Lucinda Williams. And for some reason, nobody likes Emmylou unless she's singing with Dave Matthews or Dolly Parton.
At least I can find The Real Slim Shady whenever I need it.
Wait a minute... (Score:2)
---
seumas.com
Interesting, but ultimatly doomed.. (Score:3)
1. It requires active participation of internet users. The beauty of other search engines is that you can set a bot to go out crawling, and when its done, you have a bunch of links. This idea requires that I visit this site, and give them permission to access my Hard Disk. How many users are going to do this?
2. What percentage of websites out there are even in someones favorites? I can't imagine that every site is in someone elses favorites.
3. I use favorites to keep track of sites that I won't remember the URL for. Say I read somethiung, i want to come back to it later, but I don't know where it is. I use it like temporary storage. Its faster to type in a url, especially now with the various autocomplete functionality out there. Thus, if Hotlinks raided my bookmarks, they would find a link to Slashdot postings by John Carmack, a few articles on Image Processing and Edge Detection, and the full text of The Little Prince. Its very specific information, and not the kindof information that Hotlinks is looking for.
I think this idea is in trouble. Who doesn't use Google anyway?
Captain_Frisk
Porn froups (Score:1)
Re:bookmarks everywhere... (Score:1)
Re:Backflip (Score:1)
That isn't a good thing. I called the owner and left message -- not sure what came of it.
--
"Innovative PATENT-pending technology" (Score:1)
PKB. Google's technology is just as patent-pending [slashdot.org] as HotLinks'.
I tried H****..... (Score:1)
Can you say 'demographics'? (Score:3)
Of course, the same information could be gathered with the use of persistent cookies and normal search engines - what people search for are just as useful, but when people click away and "surf" what they decide to keep close to hand probably gives a better insight of the person.
Just a thought.
not a revolution (Score:1)
Surely not that revolutionary? Many people have their bookmarks file on their webspace (I do [hawaga.org.uk]) and engines such as google [google.com] rank pages by how many links they have. They even take into account the "quality" of the page that is doing the linking.
The PC World article specifically criticises google for being "unable to organize" the links very well, yet seems to use the same technique itself. What gives?
A paper about the inner workings of google is available is in HTML [scu.edu.au]. :-( oh I see it uses some form of scripting to redirect you ... whatever happened to 30x return codes?
I went to look at the HotLinks link in the original article and it was all blank
the power is not the search engine (Score:3)
I use about 3 or 4 different computers in a week, and I actually do use bookmarks in my browsers. This means that I end up bookmarking stuff on one machine, and then not having it at another when I use it.
I'm not sure how many other people have a similar problem, but this service appears to solve it. The average slashdot reader and myself have webservers and the ability to hack together a few perl scripts, or the knowledge to find and mail our .netscape/bookmarks.html files around to keep our boomarks synchronized and always available if we want, but how can most people do this?
I would imagine that this service would be useful to the average multi-computer user. Is this the best solution you have seen for this problem? What other methods do you employ to move bookmarks from one machine to another and keep your bookmark files in sync with each other? Is this the best type of solution we can provide to users for this kind of poblem? Do you think that it's widespread enough that a good solution would be used by many people?
Re:A _big_ security hole (Score:1)
Then you are starting to venture down that terrible terrible path of the "clueless user needing to be forcibly prevented from doing anything that could be potentially harmful.
Re:That cool new dancing hamster page... (Score:1)
It's HAMSTER - WITHOUT THE P. HAMPSTER *is* *not* *a* *word*. Look it up! [dict.org]
Re:my evaluation (Score:1)
Going by user-agent headers on hits to my webspace [hawaga.org.uk]:
Googlebot indexes my site more often and in greater depth by far than the other search engines.
Now this is just one site - anybody else got robot stats?
Re:Combination (Score:1)
Checked it out...ow, change the color!
--jbWill This Work? (Score:1)
SUWAIN: Slashdot User Without An Interesting Name
Close, but not quite (Score:1)
However, in this case, it's not just my bookmarks, it's everyone's, and the bookmarks are the source of the database, not just its ranking technique. As many have already pointed out, this seems really closed and inbred.
Joe Ganley
ganley.org [ganley.org]
(OT)Hampster is not hamster. (Score:1)
Pearson is a surname; person is a species.
Yes, but... (Score:3)
Preset Links?? (Score:2)
Re:people volunteer the bookmarks (Score:2)
"HotLinks' innovative patent-pending technology... (Score:1)
Suppose the EU decides not to embrace software patents. Then I could open up a search engine over here, which uses the exact same technology—and there would be nothing that Hotlinks could do.
Even if the EU does adopt software patents, there will be places that don't. China anyone...?
How useful are patents going to be when it is no longer necessary to have a physical presence in any particular country?
What? No SEX? (Score:2)
Nonstandard HTML (Score:1)
The Jukebox Phenomenon (Score:4)
The short version of this is that current Top 40 radio station rotation systems are reputed to stem from the analysis of a jukebox supplier who noticed the same 40 records kept getting played over and over. This is because when a record gets played once, it tends to get played again, resulting in circular reinforcement, with hits one through 100 charted in a steeply declining curve. This is how current radio programming, music marketing and MTV work today: reinforcement.
The problem with this approach (in music or data) is that popularity is no guarantee of accuracy, appropriateness or utility. This is represented in the music world by the high cost (real and otherwise) of successful entry into the market. New music (data) is not popular enough to be included, but it can't easily be included without becoming popular.
Personal bookmark collections tend toward the same phenomena. Besides the inaccuracy stemming from factory-included links (which I would hope they account for), the bulk of entries will result from links in turn resulting from searches on existing search engines, which are, no matter how big, closed data sets: they have boundaries and do not include the entire web. These searches are also happening in a only few places, resulting in the JP. Hotlinks will thus tend to include sites that have already appeared elsewhere. A certain number of "missing" pages will be newly included (the user's own sites, work sites, sites of friends) but very few "missing" pages of other kinds, particularly low-traffic pages (such as those with refined and highly specialized content: deep governmental directories, university research labs). In other words, Hotlink's approach is not much different than Google's number-of-times-linked approach or bulk submitting on an engine's "add your site" link, just a larger population sample.
Napster experiences the Jukebox Phenomena: If I look for Loudon Wainwright III songs, I tend to find lots of iterations of the same three songs and not much else: Dead Skunk, I Wish I Was A Lesbian and the duo with Iris Dement. But if I want to find, say, any song off of the Therapy album, it tends not come up because it is not as popular. This is because the JP has propagated the popularity of the same three songs. An ideal data source would include the entire data set, popular or not. (I am aware Napster cannot and is not designed to be a complete data set).
If one's goal is to include more web sites, a more accurate approach than Hotlink's would be to scavenge user's History files. That would, in my case, include a few hundred additional sites a week, although I'm sure the privacy issues would be a problem. If one's goal is to return the most accurate results, an even better approach would be infinite page caching in which a new iteration of a page does not replace the previous entry, but is added to it. In this way, one could search across history as well as data.
I don't see a problem if... (Score:2)
This search engine formulation requires that other search engines exist and are used by others. If it ever gets popular it will find that increasing it's popularity will increase it's resistance to getting more popular, an interesting exercise in game theory...
Re:A _big_ security hole (Score:1)
Most linked order (Score:1)
Re:A _big_ security hole (Score:1)
Re:But I don't have any bookmarks! (Score:1)
I always type it in. Much faster than reaching for the mouse.
---
Re:Interesting, but ultimatly doomed.. (Score:1)
Re:my evaluation (Score:2)
The searching solution... (Score:1)
Re:Preset Links?? (Score:1)
Thanks and responses to issues (Score:1)
First and foremost, I would like to make an important distinction that is often lost on the media, but should be no problem for Slashdot community: HotLinks is not a search engine. We have no crawlers. We are building a web directory, like Yahoo, Snap, ODP, or LookSmart, and unlike AltaVista, Inktomi, or Google. Our goal is not to compete with existing search engines to index the entire web, but rather to create a topical web directory like Yahoo that is more scalable and comprehensive. If you could not find your home page on HotLinks, this simply means that none of our 500,000 users has bookmarked your page yet, not that our "search engine" is broken.
Research done by AltaVista and Google researchers have shown that 60% of search queries are "broad", i.e. only one or two keywords. These common queries are well-suited for human-edited web directories and less suited for crawler-based search engines, which excel at more precise searches. This is why most navigational portals include both a web directory and a crawler-based search engine, and why Yahoo and LookSmart employ hundreds of editors to create web directories manually.
As far as the default bookmarks pre-populated by Netscape or Microsoft, of course we automatically filter those out, as well as anything similar.
Several postings posted out that HotLinks could become too "self-referential". This could be a problem if HotLinks users only bookmarked sites that they found while searching HotLinks. However, this will not be the case. People will bookmark sites that they hear about from friends, that they find on other search engines (including 3rd party search engines that we integrate with our site just like Yahoo or LookSmart does), or that they find by clicking on links from a site they did find at HotLinks. There is no reason to expect that HotLinks users will contribute bookmarks of sites found only through searching HotLinks. Our members' bookmarks can point to anything on the web, even sites in the "invisible web" that would not be found with regular search engines. There are many people who use HotLinks for bookmarking but not searching, and many who use HotLinks for searching but not bookmarking. These two groups have overlap but are ultimately independent of each other.
As far as Slashdot readers who don't use (or organize) bookmarks because they only access Slashdot and two other sites or just type in the URLs by hand, or do use bookmarks but don't need HotLinks because they post their bookmarks on their personal web site or web log, with all due respect, neither of these types of behavior is typical of web users in general vs. Slashdot readers. So even if Slashdot readers don't use bookmarks or don't need HotLinks, all statistics from NFO, Jupiter, Netscape, SRI, etc. show that anywhere from 60% - 99% (depending on the study) of all Internet users use bookmarks. Jupiter Communications reports that 75% of web users online for more than two years navigate the Internet primarily via bookmarks. Studies also show web users having an average of 50+ bookmarks, and HotLinks users have closer to 100 bookmarks on average. These regular web users are also not likely to run their own web sites or web logs.
Re:Geek self-referential belief system (Score:2)
Hmmm.... sounds what slashdot has become.
-josh
Re:Nonstandard HTML (Score:3)
Re:I don't see a problem if... (Score:1)
Now, most web sites try to hold on for dear life. Links captured in frames... duplicating external content on their own site...
I guess people would call it evolution.
I think it's sad.
-Nev
Futile! (Score:1)
Ronco Powerer Search Engine (Score:1)