Hump Day Quickies 179
Some useful stuff:
An anonymous reader noted that AltaVista has opened
Raging.Com which is a super fast minimal search engine without all that bloated portal crap.
gi_wrighty noted that the winneers of the 5k HTML Contest have Been announced. Impressive minimalism.
Soeren Staun-Pedersen
noted that a new
The Gimp User Group has come along.
j1mmy pointed us to pictures of the new Lara Croft Model from E3.
Yaruar sent us a story about Lego Filmsets that come with cameras for you do-it-yourselfers. If you don't want to make your own films, how about your own Mars Polar Lander Site? (Thanks Biff Studly).
antiwesley sent us interesting insight into a typical geek cube.
Speaking of things found in geek Cubes,
BenTheDewpendent sent us a page that tracks tons of info on Mountain Dew and
bob_jordan found pictures of upcoming Futurama Bender Action Figures (Not as cool as Nate's Picolo tho)
Baloo Ursidae sent us a story about electricity generating shoes.
Gorphrim sent us some
Duron Parodies
Finally some Slashdot references: DrFun (one of the original net comics)
mentioned us in a recent strip,
Someone noted that Geek Culture is selling First Post T-Shirts.
QuasEye noted that someone registered hotgrits.org and ironically enough, is running Slashcode. And the WashPost
ran an article on us which is mostly accurate.
And to wrap things up,
maxxon showed us the way to Crank Dot Net, which has stuff on all sorts of conspiracy theories and urban myths and other crazy stuffs on the net. Stuff like UFOs, the face on mars, Creationism, Scientology, antigravity, and perpetual motion and more.
"You'd make a great Lara Croft" (Score:1)
Where's the model? (Score:4)
So anyone know where that model is? I do hope it's made of splines. Polygonal meshes are so frumpy.
Attack of the Killer Thesaurus... (Score:1)
I think this part of the Washington Post article says it all:
WTF? Yeah, whenever I think of Slashdot, I think of its robust yeastiness. Heh.
I have to agree a bit... (Score:1)
I was a google convert for some time, but perhaps I'll switch back to Raging for a while...
Re:raging.com (Score:1)
No, you're right, it's not nearly as good. Google had a booth at the Harvard Square May Fair this past Sunday (in sunny Cambridge MA) and I stopped to chat with them. They asked me what I liked best about their engine, and I replied that whatever I was looking for was usually in the top 4 or 5 results returned. I've done a few searches with Raging, and it doesn't come close to Google's accuracy.
Sure is blindinly fast, though.
robust yeastiness (Score:2)
Re:wow... (Score:1)
Huh? Do we really still live in a society where eye colour make so much difference?
HotGrits will overtake slashdot!!! (Score:1)
You don't understand Altavista (Score:1)
Google is good for people new to the inernet, and for people who want to be trendy and fashionable, but for seasoned internet users doing serious searching, Altavista is by far the best on a technical basis, because it lets you do what it wants and doesn't have stupid AI in the background. Google is only good for doing the simplest most general searches, but for anything serious it is worthless. Of course, this is to be expected since DEC built Altavista.
Raging is no Google (Score:2)
Thankfully google came along and likely stole a lot of Alta's disillusioned followers. Now they want us back with a 'minimal' search engine that is not as feature rich or effective as google.
I'll stick with the folks from Stanford.
Now this is a well-lit cube! (Score:2)
It's actually pretty spartan compared to my current office, but some of the more interesting things (some of them a bit fuzzy, sorry!) are:
Tick figure & Tick Steel Box.
Stuffed Duke.
Various Wallace & Grommit stuffed animals.
Oracle beanie - "Propel yourself onto the Internet!"
IR headphones to listen without cords (actually I hate headsets, IR or not) .
Mandatory Dogbert.
Roomarang for improving hand-eye coordination.
speaking of hotgrits.org (Score:1)
http://slashdot.com
http://slashdork.org
http://smashdot.org
http://crashdot.org
http://splashdot.org
http://trashdot.org
http://slapdash.org
http://slashnot.org
http://slashrot.org
http://slashpot.org
http://slashbot.org
(all of them run on BSD or Linux btw. Linux is just slightly more common than BSD)
electricity generating car tires... (Score:1)
---
Moderator Hopped up on Meth-amphetamines.. (Score:1)
Guh.
Re:On the Washington Post Article - /. Power? (Score:2)
They try and downplay the whole phenom at the end, but that's cause they still don't get it. Heck, they wouldn't even let me contribute my own content. Don't they know that Rob and Jeff got those millions two cents at a time.
Anyway, there's two more. Congrats guys, the new servers rock......although I have seen a couple things today that kinda scare me....G27.org got the hack [slashdot.org]
--
Re:lara croft girl (Score:1)
Of course, every girl of pretty much any age has a right to *breast-reduction* if she has health-problems due to the weight of her jugs, but I guess that's not the case here, hmm?
I certainly support girls getting implants if it makes them happy...
-Jan
Re:Do not down-moderate Signal 11's posts! (Score:2)
A bit? Hmm...ask a the poster in sid=moderation whose karma went from 52 to -9 overnight, had his default post level changed to -1, and had all his previous posts changed to -1. Pretty darn unfair if you ask me. CmdrTaco should make this public if he's doing it.
Her age (Score:2)
She's from England
Her measurements are 32DD, 25, 36
Her boyfriend is an avid Tomb Raider player, and is more excited about this than she is.
You forgot to mention... she is 16 years old.
No really, she is.
shouldn't you build the Polar Lander... (Score:2)
And please, tell me the "interface" for the Lego moviemaking kit is FireWire!
Woohoo! (Score:1)
--
Star Trek vs Star Wars. [furryconflict.com]
4r3 7h3 31337 7r011 d00dz... (Score:1)
Re:that's a typical geek?! (Score:1)
(Worst Quickies Ever
More for me! (Score:1)
Re:relitive links would be nice... (Score:1)
Another slashdot reference in the media (Score:2)
They say: Intel's first foray into box-building is something totally out of the box - a low-cost Internet access device
and illustrate it with a piccie of said device showing a slashdot page.
Sadly the web version of the article is missing the illustration.
5k 2nd place site (Score:1)
Re:Random Wibblings (Score:2)
Oh, and regarding that geek cube - to my mind fluoros are okay as long as you've got natural light, but no geek cube is complete without a Bang & Olufsen phone [bang-olufsen.com]. Block mobile interferance too.
Re:WashPost Picture (Score:1)
Thanks.
Re:You don't understand Altavista (Score:2)
(PS the hidden inference in this post is that both Google and Altavista are perfectly fine. I use both - but no others)
Lara crot model (Score:1)
Nice freudian slip:)
Re:hotgrits not running slashcode (Score:1)
Re:***Correction on Hotgrits.org story*** (Score:1)
"If I removed everything here that I thought was pointless, there would be like two messages here."
Re:Guess I'm not a typical geek... (Score:2)
mountain dew... (Score:1)
Admittedly, it has no caffeine. Certainly you can't hold that against it.
Re:Nitpicking: Lara Croft Model Gun Boo-boo (Score:2)
Actually, I wasn't paying attention to that part of the picture...
OK, OK, I know, I'm being nitpicky. But fess up, how many of you nitpicked Hackerswhile you were watching it?
Following the same logic, not when Angelina Jolie was on the screen I didn't...
raging.com (and better search enging interfaces) (Score:1)
the AltER Vista [boring.ch] project is a similar hack made by myself, (not sopnsored by altaviata) and still has some important interface improvements...
There is also an AltER Vista Advanced Search interface and a Babelfish Traduction intereface...
nice to see they were paying attantion ;-)
finally, a company who realizes that there are people who want to do something, and do not want to be blasted with a million banner ads and portal bullshit e.commerce weblog buy button whatnot...
adrien cater
boring.ch [boring.ch]
Re:Huge Lara JPEG's (Score:1)
---
that's a typical geek?! (Score:3)
Here's the dead giveaway that he's not a geek: flourescent lighting. Every geek I know who works in an office has poked out the lighting above their cubes (light.. pain.. bad!), myself included. Real Geeks use lava lamps, candlelight, or even the Glow Of the Blessed CRT Monitor.. but flourescent? Man.. no way.
Re:raging.com? why bother? (Score:1)
The Good Reverend
raging.com (Score:1)
Re:that's a typical geek?! (Score:1)
Re:Guess I'm not a typical geek... (Score:1)
Re:On the Washington Post Article - /. Power? (Score:2)
Anyway, I wonder how many people are trying to find slashdot.com right about now...?
As long as CmdrTaco is running the show, I don't have any doubt that /. will remain the "success" it is. Now if he loses editorial control... it's all downhill.
---
Re:that's a typical geek?! (Score:1)
sorry to sound like this... (Score:1)
djsw
raging.com (Score:1)
Re:You don't understand Altavista (Score:1)
Google does support phrase searching. If you search for: you get pages with "foo" and "bar". But if you search for: You'll get pages containing the phrase foo bar.
As for "near", Google already uses that when ranking things. In the first example, pages with "foo" near "bar" would be ranked higher than ones where they were far apart (all other things being equal).
Google also lets you use "-" as a logical not. The only thing it's really missing is logical "or", but for that you can do multiple queries. Maybe you should read Google's Search Tips page [google.com].
I used to use Altavista. When I first found out about Google I started using it when Altavista failed to find what I was searching for. I was impressed by the results, so I started going to Google first, and Altavista afterwards if I couldn't find what I was looking for with Google. After a while I noticed that if Google couldn't find it, Altavista almost never would.
Geek Cube? Bahahahah (Score:1)
No wonder they lost it (Score:2)
Next up, Venus Origami Probe...
Glad they went with the... (Score:1)
***Correction on Hotgrits.org story*** (Score:2)
Mea culpa
"If I removed everything here that I thought was pointless, there would be like two messages here."
raging.com is cool, but... (Score:1)
--
Re:First Moderation, now Censorship (Score:1)
Mars Polar Crater Model (Score:2)
Make my own Mars Polar Lander Site? You mean I can have my very own smoking hole in the ground? Instructions:
--Jim
Raging.com == Google.com ?! (Score:1)
The logo looks like it belongs on a soft drink bottle. (Sunkist, anyone? Ooh, wait... Orangina! That's it!)
Apart from that, though, if I can get Altavista's thorough results without the bloat, count me in!
--
"Give him head?"
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft Ad
Raging.com sucks (Score:1)
We're sorry. Raging.com does not support text-only browsers. For a superior text-only search, please visit AltaVista.
Why do they need an extra text version for a lightweight search engine, which is ideal for text browsers as it stands, anyway? And besides, this appears only in lynx, it works fine in links and w3m (in case you don't know, cool lynx-like text browsers that can do tables, look them up at freshmeat).
Lucy / Lara and trigger fingers (Score:1)
Use the pad of the finger, not the 2nd joint. Much better control.
Re:Spielberg & Legos? (Score:1)
It works in w3m (Score:2)
So Rob has adult supervision :) (Score:2)
The boys [/. authors] do have some adult supervision: Robin Miller, managing editor of all Andover sites, makes sure that Slashdot's articles are grammatical and libel-free, and not spelled with the numeric-letter mixture ("D00D!!! LET'S RIP SOME WAREZZZ!") that characterizes much geek typing.
It's nice to hear that w/o Andover, /. would fast become a warez trading site if Rob had his way ;)
--
Troll Homepage - Sign of the Apocalypse (Score:1)
Then I saw in the right hand of him who sat on Slashdot the code with writing on many files and sealed with tar and gzip. And I saw a mighty angel proclaiming in a loud voice, "Who is worthy to break the seals and execute the code?" .... Then one of the elders said to me, "Do not weep! See HotGrits.com of the tribe of Trolls, the scourge of Slashdot has triumphed. They have run the code and its many files.
Re:that's a typical geek?! (Score:1)
I thought it was just plain "hates light", regardless of color, creed, etc.
But most especially that big round super-bright one that goes across the sky while we sleep, and motivates much blanketing of windows and the like. (Perhaps because that one is designed on the heretical notion of roundness, rather than being properly screen-shaped.)
--
Re:First Moderation, now Censorship (Score:2)
Google (Score:1)
TheGeek
Re:"You'd make a great Lara Croft" (Score:1)
Google's syntax is really nasty (Score:1)
Futurama and DeCSS? (Score:1)
Coming soon to illegal DVD
I fell off the sofa laughing when I saw this, assuming it was an allusion to the DeCSS lawsuits, (especially funny since Fox, as a member of the MPAA, is involved in the persecution.
I can't seem to locate a framegrab of it on the net on the moment so if anyone knows where to find one please post a link.
laura croft (Score:1)
2medium.jpg -- okay, never, ever pose her with her legs cocked like that again.
with better props, and IF she has a a good mixture of script, director and attitude, she can make it. in other words, this will be a failure.
The Slashdot article on WashPost is dumb (Score:1)
The boys do have some adult supervision: Robin Miller, managing editor of all Andover sites, makes sure that Slashdot's articles are grammatical and libel-free, and not spelled with the numeric-letter mixture ("D00D!!! LET'S RIP SOME WAREZZZ!") that characterizes much geek typing.
This is idiotic! The numeric-letter mix that this article refers to is exclusively the use of nitwit Hacker-wannabes.
Also, what's the deal with Slashdot having 'adult supervision'. Que? Malda and Bates are both 23, not pre-teens. 23 is middle-aged if not nearing retirement in the Internet-Economy.
This article is obviously written by an artifact of the old media. It's kinda funny, if you think about it, a relic from the old media writing a semi-accurate article about the new media... A question, is the condescending tone part of an unconcious defense mechanism?
Hmmm, she makes a good lara croft (Score:1)
but huge tits.
Quick Geek Inventory (Score:1)
Geek office items (Score:1)
Hmmm... let's see what I've got here:
Does any of that count?
--
Re:lara croft girl (Score:1)
Re:laura croft (Score:2)
Spooky (Score:1)
That guy is a spitting image of a guy I know. Same body-shape, same hair colour, same mess, same Anime stuff on the wall.
Only difference is, my friends machine is an Amiga 4000/040!
Heh... bet he doesn't have that in his little cube!
"How much truth can advertising buy?" - iNsuRge [insurge.com.au] - AK47
Moderate up please. (Score:1)
"If I removed everything here that I thought was pointless, there would be like two messages here."
Random.com is minimal...so why must they... (Score:1)
-----------------------------------------------
Nitpicking: Lara Croft Model Gun Boo-boo (Score:2)
The new Lara model is definitely hot, but I couldn't help notice the gun boo-boos here...image 1 [core-design.com] and image 3 [core-design.com] show Lara with her finger on the trigger. You always, always, always keep the finger off of a trigger unless it's pointed at something you want to shoot. (Fortunately the gun she's holding is a 1911 with the hammer down; 1911s are single-actions and can't possibly fire unless the hammer is in the cocked position. So we can presume we're ok here). Image 4 [core-design.com] has Lara blowing smoke out of the barrel...also very dangerous, from the look of it she could blow her nose off. Never point a gun at something you're not willing to destroy and always assume it's loaded. And image 5 [core-design.com] has her pointing the gun right at us....I sure hope the photographer wasn't standing in front of that barrel. I'm all for people experiencing new things, but being shot is not one of them!
OK, OK, I know, I'm being nitpicky. But fess up, how many of you nitpicked Hackerswhile you were watching it? :)
The Second Amendment Sisters [sas-aim.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:bender (Score:2)
...phil
Really, A Discussion Of Cubicles... (Score:2)
..just isn't complete without at least one mention of the legendary cubicle prank [theswindle.com].
Re:Google's syntax is really nasty (Score:2)
I've got an entry for the 5k html contest, BTW. I downloaded the google page, saved it to the HD, and pared it down to the bare essentials. No graphics, one line, consisting of the entry box and the two buttons. It's under 300 bytes, and is completely correct HTML. I could probably strip another 100 off it if I got rid of HTML, BODY, and the javascript to auto-focus the search box (though that's damn convenient). In fact, getting rid of one of the search buttons and other paring, I'll bet I could get it down to less than 100 bytes.
Well, this post sure wandered, didn't it. Anyway, ignore this part and keep the useful suggestion about using quotes. And bug Google about documenting how their parser works, and we might get some good documentation.
Huge Lara JPEG's (Score:2)
raging.com? why bother? (Score:2)
and it's not a new search engine, it's just a new interface as far as I can see. I just did a search on altavista.com and on raging.com, exact same results.
--------------------------------
off topic, but i have to say it:
this dumba$$ leech at my high
school made it to MIT, yet today
on the AP statistics test, the
question asked him to draw an
ellipse and he drew a parabola!
(no, he wasn't doing that for
fun, he honestly did not know
what an ellipse was!) WTF? how
does a dumba$$ like that get
into MIT and also get the regent
scholarship from Berkeley while
I get rejected by both schools?
$$#$!#%%$@%%
--------------------------------
Zetetic
Seeking; proceeding by inquiry.
Elench
A specious but fallacious argument; a sophism.
relitive links would be nice... (Score:2)
MMmmm...Yeasty! (Score:2)
Slashdot: Now with robust yeastiness!
Raging influenced by Google? (Score:2)
Either way, google is just want I need, and all I have on my home page [ajs.com].
Random Wibblings (Score:2)
Yet more Futurama stuff [rocketusa.com] including a clockwork Bender. I want one.
icebox.com [icebox.com] which has various Flash cartoons, some of which are created (and voiced by) people behind The Simpsons [snpp.com] and Futurama [frcr.com]. They seem pretty good - and somewhat politically incorrect.
The Answer to Life, the Universe and Everything [man.ac.uk], a blatant plug to my utterly crap web site. Do not expect useful content.
Ford Prefect
Lego Movies (Score:2)
Some sort of CGI movie making kit would be cool (like a cross between the Lego shape set for POVray and the fictional OOP product in Microserfs), but since the article says the kit comes with a real camera that must not be the case.
Re:The Slashdot article on WashPost is dumb (Score:4)
Think of the old joke about the difference between the Army and the Boy Scouts: They both wear green and sleep in tents a lot, but -- unlike the Army -- the Boy Scouts have adult supervision.
John Schwartz, the Post reporter who did the story, is a very nice guy with a wry sense of humor -- and about 700% more tech knowledge than most of the mainstream press people I've met in the DC area. He's even starting to get into Linux.
Remember, Schwartz was trying to explain Slashdot to a typical newspaper audience. That's not an easy task. Think: the site's name alone makes most people say "Huh?"
I think the d00d did about as good a job as could have been done, even though some of his research was a little outdated. I have moved (Whoo!) to a double-wide bouse trailer since I last talked to him.
- Robin
bender (Score:2)
That don't make no sense.
The picture on the site isnt' red.
I made a wallpaper [interlog.com] with the signs a while back (800x600) when some of the images weren't bigger.
Pope
Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!
On the Washington Post Article - /. Power? (Score:2)
If you have not read the article, essentially the writer found some guy to say that he does not think
HELLO?!!!
This sounds like the exact same argument being thrown out about why free software will not succeed (i.e., that developers will stop supporting it because it will stop being revolutionary). If the media would stop attaching a label to things, taking it upon themselves to define a purpose for other people, then maybe there would not be all this incessant talk.
Who ever said
Good motivator to exercise (Score:3)
Signal11 would be a fucking anorexic.
-konstant
Yes! We are all individuals! I'm not!
As The Original Hot Grits Guy... (Score:3)
How about... (Score:2)
* Halogen lamp
* Cheap K-Mart chair for guests (makes 'em leave quicker)
* Cheesy desk fan
* Battery operated analog clock movement (just hands, no face)
* SANS poster
* Three whiteboards
* Homemade air-current spinny thing (1)
* Flower made from telephone hookup wire (1)
* Cactus terarium, with one dead cactus and plastic lizard
* Spool of 100' of Cat-3
* A ton of RS/6000 and SunExpert Magazines
* One big ass peace lily plant
* Leonardo Da Vinci calendar
Notes:
1 - These two items are taped onto my monitor.
Of course, this is in my office - not my cubicle (though I actually miss my cube)...
Maybe I am just messy, and not geeky...hmm...
Under 5k web pages... that load slowly... (Score:4)
Nice /. story (Score:2)
mmmm, robust yeastiness. Hey, I smell beer, have some of you been drinking?
--
Re:that's a typical geek?! (Score:2)
At my old office, I used to collect company disbursed halogen lamps (it was an office in Boulder, and thus much enlightned) from departing co-workers, and at one point had seven halogen lamps in a cube that I could activate at once to blot out any sunlight that made it my way, and also to provide a fine heat source.
I have a 360 degree picture from that cube, it was a lot more impressive than the one shown! If only I had it on the web somewhere...
All the info you want to know... (Score:2)
Re:wow... (Score:2)
You could spend some time with the GIMP. [sorry]