Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

Movie Review: 'High Fidelity' 121

Stephen Fear's High Fidelity is as good a movie as the l995 Nick Hornsby novel on which it is based. The movie brilliantly evokes the overheated life of the urban single, and gives us a nostalgic period piece for the long-ago-and-far-away age of vinyl records, along with the obsessive music geeks who loved and collected them. (Read More)

Aside from the change of location (from London to Chicago) High Fidelity is a surprisingly faithful cinematic rendering of Hornby's terrific novel about the twisted love lives of a hapless band of obsessive music geeks who run a record store that specializing in vinyl copies of hard-to-find albums. The move is as funny, savvy and biting as the book.

In the Mp3 era, High Fidelity is almost something of a l950's period piece, when rock-and-roll inspired music crazies spent hours sorting through bins of records, polishing and carefully storing their vinyl and blowing the dust off. John Cusack is great as Rob, the owner of Championship Vinyl, who is as obsessed with women who have dumped him as he is with spouting lists of songs for every conceivable occasion. In fact, Rob sees life as a series of top five lists -- especially the five most painful relationships in which he has been dumped by women.

Moving the movie from London to a gritty Chicago neighborhood was risky, since London was a vivid backdrop to the original story, but it works. Rock was, after all, born in the U.S.A. The book and the movie are penetrating looks at the sometimes bewildering life of the urban single. One of the movie's interesting devices is that Cusack addresses the camera directly throughout the film, explaining his story directly to us. The bare-outlines plot focuses on his efforts to win back Laura (Iben Hjejle), who, to his mortification, takes up with his upstairs neighbor Ian (played by Tim Robbins), a pompous expert in conflict resolution who sports a pony-tail and a lot of New Age chatter.

Although Rob sees himself as a perpetual victim of diffident women, the movie makes clear, even to him, that relationships are more complicated than that.

As good as Cusack he (he also co-wrote High Fidelity's screenplay, which lifts whole chunks verbatim from the novel), he is nearly upstaged by Jack Black (Barry) and Todd Louiso (Dick), two hilariously odd music freaks who work for him (he hired them years ago to work three days a week, he confides, but they never left). Barry in particular brilliantly embodies the 50's/60's music crazy -- addicted, intemperate, astonishingly knowledgeable, arrogantly defensive and superior about music. In one scene, he practically tosses a clueless middle-aged father out of the story for wanting to buy a lousy album for his daughter's birthday. The type will be instantly familiar to everyone reading this.

There's also a surprise guest appearance by a major rock star, whose identity won't be given away here.

High Fidelity is a terrific movie, a must-see -- well-paced, funny, beautifully written and well acted. Perhaps without meaning to, it's also a bit of a nostalgic film, a peek inside a culture that mostly lives online, and has been Wal-Marted out of the real world.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Movie Review: 'High Fidelity'

Comments Filter:
  • Every time Jon Katz posts something with a year number in it, he starts it with an el. Good thing we live in the year 2OOO now, eh?
  • by Anonymous Coward
    This is clearly an April 2nd joke.
  • There are still geeks out there who spend hours obsessing about their records every day and spend all their time cleaning them and caring for them...

    We are called DJs =)

    Just because most of the music I have is in MP3 format doesnt mean I dont buy music, I just only buy it on vinyl.
  • High Fidelity has to be the only movie I've actually walked out of in recent memory. Not only was it (a) not funny in the least, it was also (b) boring as hell.

    Sorry, I don't go for movies about people who sit around, sulk, and feel sorry about themselves. Although I'm sure that Katz can relate.

  • by Lemmy Caution ( 8378 ) on Sunday April 02, 2000 @06:31AM (#1156188) Homepage
    but the little independent corner record store is alive and well in 90% of the cities that I travel to (and I travel to a lot of cities.) As an institution, I don't see it in any danger of disappearing.

    They don't compete with Walmart. Walmart will never carry Stiff Little Fingers vinyl and Beefheart first editions. They may be competing with Ebay, but I know of very few music geeks who would buy vinyl sight-unseen. If they are under any threat, it's much more like to be a matter of the pandemic rent hikes that major cities are experiencing now. But I still see a lot of indie record stores. In the Bay Area (Berkeley and San Francisco) we have Amoeba Music, the greatest music store in the world, and my favorite small store, Aquarius Records. We've got places like Streetlight. When I travel to San Diego, Seattle, Portland, and Chicago, I never fail to find cool little stores.

    I just saw the movie. It was excellent - not Oscar material, but a good, funny, honest movie about relationships. I also do know some people for whom pop music is so deeply enmeshed in the fabric of their day to day lives, that it is part of their emotional and interpersonal language, a sort of kaliedoscopic reflection of their inner lives.

  • The movie was kinda low tech, but I was struck by the similarity in attitude between the workers at the store toward the customers, and in the attitude of some techies I've known toward users. "Top 5 songs about death" could morph into "Top 5 favourite features of OO programing in C++."

    Over all a very good movie. Man John Cusack does a good job.

    BTW, does anyone know how to pronounce Hjejle??? I think it's probably something like "Hi-yay-lee" with a very short "hi."

    IMHO, as per

    J:)
  • I don't know what its like to be dumped, and i mean that in a bad sense :)

    Mike Roberto (roberto@soul.apk.net [mailto]) - AOL IM: MicroBerto
  • i thought that they were getting proof readers for that sort of thing.

    i mean, come on jon. the movie is directed by Stephen FREARS, not 'Fears', and based on the book by Nick HORNBY, not 'Hornsby'. I thought the number one rule of writing was to read back what you write?

    Still, they seem to have sorted out the horribly overlong nature of some of jon's articles...so it can't be all bad...
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Typical. Take a good (or potentially profitable) story and set it in America because thats what the marketing men say. As a Londoner, I idendified very strongly with the novel and imagine it will loose a lot of this by being moved to America. The main character is a very English (in the way he is a total loser in the way only the English are) as are his attitudes. Fans of the novel in the US - if you like this kind of novel about sad, single males in London can check out 'A While Merc with Fins' by James Hawes and 'Love and Nausea' by David Wilson.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    The movie has its moments, the fact that I got to see it on the industry's dime made it that much better (if anything I did not have to walk out pissed at how much I spent). That being said, this is the second movie in a 1 year period that Cusack has been in a film that has used a funeral as a vehicle (the other being Pushing Tin). Unlike Pushing Tin, which turned out to be a chick flick in disguise, High Fidelity actually had a better more plausible ending. It had its moments, but could and did drag on at times (and clocked in somewhere round 2 hours which should not be that long). The only other movie that drug on longer was the Bruce Lee story, probably one of the worst tributes to a single person ever made. I'd wait for it to come out on video, mainly to continue giving the industry the finger in regards to the whole DeCSS mess. RIMBoy....
  • Nick Hornby. No 's' in there. Also the author of Fever Pitch, an excellent (and quick) read about the life of an English football supporter. In his case, he supports Arsenal, but it's enjoyable even if you're a supporter of a different club.
  • "Stephen Fear's" (sic)? I'm sorry, but is there something about electronic publishing which prohibits proof-reading? This movie was made by Stephen Frears (I'll leave it to the reader to figure out where to place the apostrophe when needed).
  • a peek inside a culture that mostly lives online, and has been Wal-Marted out of the real world.

    What do you mean? Online is the real world!!
    ---------
    Always posting non-anonomously, 'cuz, you know, I'm an anti-karma whore.
  • by MichaelH ( 3651 ) <pdxmph+sd.gmail@com> on Sunday April 02, 2000 @07:08AM (#1156197) Homepage

    Barry in particular brilliantly embodies the 50's/60's music crazy -- addicted, intemperate, astonishingly knowledgeable, arrogantly defensive and superior about music.

    This type never went away. In fact, I'd argue that they got worse as time's gone on because the language of criticism has been appropriated by just about every schmuck with an opinion. Including me, by the way.

    People used to aspire to an appearance of sophistication by subscribing to the right book clubs and doing paint-by-numbers of old masterpieces. Now they just hang out and talk like post-structuralists. I'd prefer the older forms of middle class insecurity, because people eventually try to dump their paint-by-numbers of sad clowns and moody watermills, or string art, or mass-edition copies of the book du jour, for a nickel apiece. If we keep up this practice of blabbering like academics without creating a demand in the market for the trappings of our sophistication, people like me are going to have nothing to pick up at Salvation Army in twenty years.

    I think, by the way, I'd like to cast my vote (with whoever's keeping track) to declare use of the word "geek" oversaturated, or at least badly in need of reevaluation. I overheard a 30-something referring to herself as a "Friends" geek. You know... an unconventional outsider who sits in front of a tv for half an hour per week at the same time as millions of others, feeling the bitter sting of persecution because of her love for a television show some corporation has identified as suitably safe to serve as filler between the commercials.
    ------------
    Michael Hall
    mphall@cstone.nospam.net

  • I KNEW IT! The truth is finally revealed! Jon Katz is a martian who crash-landed on Earth after being made an outcast in his martian tribe! All this time, we thought columbine, those 'outcast' posts, and stuff were from his twisted childhood. Now we have proof! He's posting about URBAN LIFE - *martian* urban life! There's no other possible conclusion.. Earthlings know it's nothing like the description above...

    Jon Katz is a geek martian!

  • I remember them well. Like that time those punk kids with pink hair ripped off my record store and I resented them until I realized their band rocked nads and I put out their CD.

    Woogie
  • The author seems to have no objection [salon.com] to the change in venue from London to Chicago. I assure you, we have many losers of that ilk here in the states. On the other hand, "Fever Pitch", his novel about football (soccer), absolutely could not translate across the sea.

    Hornby actually discusses the limits of geography on story in the interview.

    It should be noted that while Rob is a bit self-pitying, it isn't really accurate to describe him as simply "lonely." He's not just a frustrated geek who can't get a date - rather, he's under the impression that he is getting rejected, yet is initially blind to the ways in which he sabotaged the relationships he was in.

  • damn straight. vinyl will never die. it's what fuels the entire electronic music scene.

    --
    life ain't life without my tech 12's
  • I really don't know why Katz is even bothering. This movie had nothing to do with the 50s and 60s. The strongest nostalgia I saw was for the late 70s through mid 80s, and the film was definitely set in the present day (or at least sometime after Stereolab's Aluminum Tunes and the Beta Band's EPs were released), both in millieu and in attitude. The only character who fit Katz's demographic was Tim Robbin's reprehensible Ian - every other character there was in their 30's or younger. I don't like to get personal when I respond to someone's writing, but Katz really is looking through the narcissistic rose-colored glasses of baby-boomer self-importance.
  • i understand it's EE-ben YAY-lay
  • I haven't seen the film, but if it really is just like the book, then it must be *awful*. Unless you like self-indulgent pre middle age poor-me-won't-be-young-for-ever crises.

    Possibly I'm just too young, and you need to have been the age of the hero to appreciate the book, but it did strike me that him and Bridget Jones would make an excellent couple - they deserve each other.

    andy.
  • Are you gay by any chance? I'm totally serious here, though I'll probably get marked flame-bait. I saw the movie last night with a gay (male) friend of mine and he absolutely hated it. I loved it, and so did the other straight guy who was with us. It got me to thinking, because I hated Talented Mr. Ripley, which was sort of a gay love story, and this same gay friend loved it. I think it's an identification issue, I couldn't identify with Matt Damon's character in Ripley, and my friend couldn't get behind Cusack in High Fidelity.

    Anyway, just a thought.
  • Not to mention all those compilation tapes I made in the 50's... Ahh, those were the days.

    Which reminds me -- did anyone who saw this movie think the RIAA would object? People are taping albums for each other every five minutes...
  • by CdotZinger ( 86269 ) on Sunday April 02, 2000 @07:50AM (#1156207)
    I haven't seen the movie, yet. I read the book when it came out, and, frankly, I don't remember much about it, except that I read it really quickly (not "thinky" enough for my taste). That said....

    There's something about us record geeks that, if Katz had known it, would have made a better "angle" for this review than that tacked-on mp3/WalMart schtick he always does. Our records are our lives. And I don't mean that we're merely obsessed with them. They're us--we live there in our piles of pressed plastic. I don't know how to explain this to a typical "record user" without a boring personal anecdote, so here goes:

    A couple weeks ago, this fabulous babe I know and I finally managed to hook up after years of futilely flashing the fuck-eye at each other while being overinvolved with annoying losers. On the way home after our tremendously cool and fun first date, I had Shudder to Think's *50,000 BC* on in the car. So that's where my memory lives--all the coolness and fun and that awesome-first-date feeling--it's in those songs. I don't have it without them. Conversely, things have since gotten kind of shitty and tense between us, for reasons neither of us is airing. I've been listening to the new Love-Cars and the last Sunny Day Real Estate album a lot--sad, confused, frustrated records. And they're where my sadness, confusion, and frustration live now. This week is what those songs will always be about; they're me, this week, and they're how I'll always remember it. I'll never get it back without hearing them, and I'll never hear them without getting it back.

    The Cusack character in the movie has the same problem. His emotional life is mediated by popular culture (in that you have to buy records before you can get unhealthily attached to them) to a harmful degree, and it's his getting past that that the book's (partly) about (hence the record *store* setting). And the more thoughtful among us (like Cusack himself (met him once--awesome guy), and all of us who've read Adorno) know that this is a huge-ass emotional problem we record geeks have. We've become one with The Spectacle :).

    Geeks I know, of every sort, have a similiar, allegedly abnormal transferrence-of-emotion thing going on. I'm about nine kinds of geek myself, though I'm not enough of a computer geek to know where they store their feelings. An HFS+ partition, maybe? I suspect it'd be hard to make a movie about it.

    Did I make my point yet? Screw it; this is too long.

    PS: I was planning to see the movie tonight, but the Love-Cars are playing, so... :)

  • If you haven't been dumped, think of it this way: it's sorta like finding out your new GeForce is incompatible with your new Athlon mobo.

    =(

  • I have a deep dark addiction... one that forces me to spend hundreds of dollars a week/month.. one which never ceases... never sleeps... and will continue until I or the electricity dies..... it is far worse then my friends' E or pot habits.... nay it is not a chemical dependancy... but one etched in "vinyl"

    it is .... a record addiction.... one which makes DJing the most expensive hobby on the planet today

    My home away from home is the record store... and my name is legion... for we are many

    err.. sorry... wrong quotation... wrong time

    but, lets hear it for all the dj's out there who have more milk crates full of records then they have cans of coke on their computer desk ;)

    cheers,
    ecc
  • The word "otaku" in Japanese originally meant the type of person who hung out at anime and sci-fi cons, and basically had no life outside their favorite anime and manga. Over the past two decades or so the word has expanded in meaning to mean an enthusiast of any sort, whether his hobby be anime, computers, ham radio, or collecting data on teenage idol singers (also a big Japanese phenomenon). Only recently has modern American culture developed a concept analogous to the Japanese otaku: the "geek". It was originally almost synonymous with "nerd" (i.e., any social reject, though usually an intelligent one); now, since certain classes of geeks have gained more mainstream awareness, we use the term to imply a self-made cognoscenti of various topics, from computers to diesel engines to "Buffy the Vampire Slayer". IMHO, the proliferation of otakus and geeks is the sign of a rich and vibrant culture, as these intellectuals are capable of critically analyzing the subject of their otaku-domain much more thoroughly than an "average" individual, and they become educators and awareness-raisers for "the rest of us". They also develop rampant wannabee-ism amongst non-geeks; an unfortunate side effect. Sorry for "metageeking" (being a geek about geeks!) in true Katz fashion. Thanks to people like him the word "geek" is a little trite and worn around the edges. But mainstream America has a new class and culture of people to deal with... instead of merely dismissing like they did before. In keeping with their traditions they must apply some sort of convenient label. Frankly I prefer "geek" to "nerd". :)
  • Stephen Fear's Geek Fidelity is as good a movie as the 1995 Geek Hornsby novel on which it is based. The movie brilliantly evokes the overheated life of the urban single, and gives us a nostalgic period piece for the long-ago-and-far-away age of vinyl records, along with the obsessive music geeks who loved and collected them. Aside from the change of location (from London to Chicago) High Fidelity is a surprisingly faithful cinematic rendering of Hornby's terrific novel about the twisted Geek lives of a hapless band of obsessive music geeks who run a record store that specializing in vinyl copies of hard-to-find albums. The move is as funny, savvy and biting as the book.

    In the Mp3 era, High Geek is almost something of a l950's period piece, when rock-and-roll inspired music crazies spent hours geeking through bins of records, polishing and carefully storing their vinyl and blowing the dust off. John Geek is great as Rob, the owner of Championship Vinyl, who is as obsessed with geek geek have geeked him as he is with spouting lists of geeks for every conceivable occasion. In fact, Rob sees life as a series of top geek lists -- especially the five geek painful relationships in which he has geek dumped geek women.

    Moving the movie from London to a gritty Chicago neighborhood was risky, since Geek was a geek geek to the original story, but it works. Geek was, after all, born in the U.S.A. The book and the movie geek penetrating looks geek the sometimes bewildering life of the urban single. One of the movie's interesting devices is that Cusack addresses the geek directly throughout the film, explaining his story directly to geeks. The geek-outlines geek focuses on his efforts geek win back Laura (Geek Hjejle), who, to his geek, takes up geek his upstairs geek Geek (played by Tim Geeks), a geeks expert in conflict resolution who sports a pony-tail and a lot of New Geek chatter.

    Although Geek sees himself as a geek victim of geek women, the geek geeks clear, even to geek, that relationships are more complicated than that.

    As good as Cusack he (geek also co-wrote Geek Geek's geek, which lifts whole chunks verbatim from the novel), he is nearly geeked by Jack Black (Barry) and Geek Louiso (Geek), two hilariously geek music geeks who work for geek (he hired them years geek geek work geek days a week, he confides, geek they geek left). Geek geek particular geek embodies the 50'geeks/60's music geek -- addicted, intemperate, astonishingly knowledgeable, arrogantly defensive and geek about music. In geek scene, he geek tosses a clueless geek-geeked father geek of the story for geeking geek buy a geek geek for his geek's birthday. The type geek be instantly familiar to everyone geeking this.

    There's also a surprise geek geek geek a major geek star, whose geek won't be geek geek geek.

    High Fidelity is a terrific movie, a must-see -- geek-geeked, geek, beautifully written and well geeked. Perhaps without meaning geek, it's geek a bit of a nostalgic geek, a peek inside a geek geek mostly geeks geek, and has been Wal-Marted out of the real Geek.


    Grades, Social Life, Sleep....Pick Two.
  • No, I'm not gay. It wasn't the life experiences of the main character that I had a complaint with. I didn't like the feel of the movie at all. A movie where a person tells the audience how much his life sucks isn't my bag of tea.

    I wasn't the only person who walked out, though.

  • Not only that, but you don't need to be a "record" geek to be like this. I live through music -- not only do I have music on nearly every waking moment (and while I sleep, usually -- last night it was Underworld's Beaucoup Fish), but my moods always have music associated with them. Music is quite literally the soundtrack to my life. Nearly every important moment of my life has music associated with it. And I own very few records (mostly Rush and Pink Floyd records that I also have on CD). In fact, my existence is so colored by music that I honestly don't understand how most people can live without music on constantly.

    So I think Katz is way off-base when he says this type of person is wrong. I'm not nearly as hardcore (or obscure) as the characters in the movie, but I identified 100% with their attitudes and feelings about music. I also identified a lot with Cusack's feelings on women -- perhaps too much. I came out of the movie hyped up and feeling good. I think I'll buy this when it's out on DVD. I felt so good, in fact, that I went to Tower (right next door to the theater and down the street from my apartment) and picked up Apollo 440 - Gettin' High on Your Own Supply. Dammit, I need a cheap indie store near my apartment (good ones near Fair Lakes, Fairfax, VA, anyone?).

    Anyway, that's my $21.12. I'm going back to my Freddy Jones Band CD (Waiting for the Night) now -- hey, it's on topic! They're from Chicago...

    P.S. Does anyone know what the techno-y song Rob was playing at the club when they first showed him as a DJ was? I'd love to find it, but I can't figure out what (or who) it was.
  • Vinyl is still an affordable medium for independent bands to put out music on. If you take a look at any of the larger independent labels in existence (like Dischord [southern.com], Alternative Tentacles [alternativetentacles.com], Victory [victoryrecords.com] or Matador [matadorrecords.com]) you can see that they still produce a tremendous number of vinyl records.

    This is done for a few reasons:

    It's a less substantial investment than CDs (if the band just doesn't sell, it's less money lost by the label than if they gone ahead and released a full-length CD with them).

    Consumers are more willing to spend $3 on a seven inch record of a band they've never heard of than $12 for a full-length CD.

    A seven inch with four songs by a band just starting out will most likely have four of their better songs, whereas they might have to struggle to produce an entire CD of music, and write a lot of crappy songs.

    and of course:

    Damn it, they just sound better.

    Steve
  • Guess I'll have to rethink my theory :)
    thanks.
  • He can even make a simple movie review seem pretentious. What a guy.
  • I didn't read the book and don't intend to. It might ruin my experience of the film. Seriously. Perhaps this is one of the few times when the movie is better than the basis-book!

    I found the film extremely suspenseful, funny, and chock-full of subtlety and strong plot and character development. I'm recommending it to everyone I know.

  • Yeah, in the beginning, basically the first half, Rob (main character) is self-pitying and whines a bit. But did you get to the part where he does the Top Five things he misses about his ex? After that, it's a lot more like he's searching for ... trying to do better. He grows away from his self-involved arrogance. Before that, I was simultaneously rooting for him and despising him and laughing at him -- afterwards, there was little or no disgust. You had to wait a while for the character development, but it was WELL worth it -- that was the most satisfying movie I've been to in a year.

    And the music was pretty cool, even though I'm no music freak.

  • I agree with your analysis of Rob's problem.

    The Cusack character in the movie has the same problem. His emotional life is mediated by popular culture (in that you have to buy records before you can get unhealthily attached to them) to a harmful degree, and it's his getting past that that the book's (partly) about (hence the record *store* setting).

    I'm sure there have been times in my life when it HELPED to have a song as an object-to-think-about (I just read Sherry Turkle's "The Second Self"), but I can see how it would be easy to slip overboard and into the morass of emotion that you THINK is your own. The commercial element has something to do with this -- so does the isolation and elitism of him and his fellow music lovers (definitely Barry, but also, if you look for it, Dick and Annaugh).

    Side note -- isn't it odd how geeks often believe in the inflexible Law of Mainstreaming and Goodness; the quality of a band/OS/ISP/writer/brand of anything varies inversely to its/her/his popularity. Championship Vinyl doesn't carry that mainstream stuff -- ugh. Celine Dion? Whitney Houston? No, and f--- you for asking. To prove that you are great, you must be misunderstood -- only geniuses like yourself must understand and love your work. The free market philosophy in inverse -- reaction to commercialization/ rationalization of failure, or something more?

  • vinyl will never die. it's what fuels the entire electronic music scene

    Ironic, isn't it?

  • I waited through the very end of the credits. "Soundtrack available on Hollywood Records," it said. And Hollywood Records [hollywoodrec.com] DOES have the 'High Fidelity' soundtrack and more information is here. [go.com]

    BTW, at the HR site you can listen to clips from the songs, the list of which I duly post here:

    1.13th FLOOR ELEVATORS "You're Gonna Miss Me"

    2.THE KINKS "Everybody's Gonna Be Happy"

    3.JOHN WESLEY HARDING "I'm Wrong About Everything" [FULL SONG]

    4.VELVET UNDERGROUND "Oh Sweet Nuthin'"

    5.LOVE "Always See Your Face"

    6.BOB DYLAN "Most Of The Time"

    7.SHEILA NICHOLLS "Fallen For You" [FULL SONG]

    8.BETA BAND "Dry The Rain"

    9.ELVIS COSTELLO "Ship Building"

    10.SMOG "Cold Blooded Old Times"

    11.JACK BLACK "Let's Get It On"

    12.STEREOLAB "Lo Boob Oscillator"

    13.ROYAL TRUX "Inside Game"

    14.VELVET UNDERGROUND "Who Loves The Sun"

    15.STEVIE WONDER "I Believe (When I Fall In Love)"

    I think that's the entire soundtrack -- it felt like more, though, when I saw the credits. I believe these are in chronological order -- in terms of when they are played in the movie. And, in fact, if you click "buy the soundtrack," you get directed here [express.com] -- not Amazon, but "Express". $12.98? Perhaps a bargain.

  • Nah, that's "Geek dammit!".
  • I would recommend that you visit the "High Fidelity" web site. [go.com] Especially visit the "Top Five" portion [go.com]. You can read funny Top Five lists, some in the movie and some not (SPOILER ALERT!). Also sprinkled throughout the sites are little Top Five videos with the cast from the flick. Kool.
  • I could get the soundtrack, but the track I'm looking for isn't on it. The first thing I did after leaving the movie was walk over to Tower and look at the soundtrack. I also checked the website and it certainly wasn't in the samples they had. Unfortunately, the IMDB doesn't have full credits yet, and I can't find a full list of songs to Napster anywhere else...

    BTW, was it just my imagination or did I notice Rush's Broon's Bane (off Exit Stage Left) in the credits? I don't recall hearing it in the movie...
  • I don' know...I'm in the mid-twenty-something bracket, and read the book about a year ago (in pretty much one setting I might add..) I was able to relate quite a bit to many of the trials and tribulations the characters were going through....Maybe it's because I have this odd addiction to music, and that retrospectively my obsession with getting, playing, and listening to music gives a "soundtrack" to my life wich bring up piognant memories during casual listening later.


    For whatever reason I really enjoyed the book, and have put the movie on my must see list....

  • We've spoken about this before (please see my post about epudding [slashdot.org] from a few days ago. Not everything is about geeks, geek life, and geek culture. As I mentioned before, that "culture" doesn't really exist, as most of the "geeks" I know are so vastly different from one another as to be almost uncanny. If ePudding didn't do it for you, John, try this on for size...

    We have here a bottle of Windex(tm) brand glass cleaner. But this is no ordinary Windex(tm) brand glass cleaner... no way, no how, nuh uh. This is Geek Windex(tm) Why, do you ask, is it so special and geek-oriented? Well, I'll tel you. Its uses in the last twenty four hours alone have been so geek-like that it can't possibly be described as regular Windex(tm) brand glass cleaner anymore. Most recently, it was used to clean the one inch layer of dust off of my computer monitor. Before that, I cleaned my big fat 34" Geek television, which is used to display movies from my Geek DVD player. Only Geek movies are played on that DVD player, by the way. And those DVDs, when dirty are cleaned with Geek Windex(tm). What else do I use Geek Windex for? Why, for cleaning my bathroom mirror, of course! And since I'm such a geek, and all of my friends are geek-by-association, it's a Geek Mirror! Hot damn! I've spawned a whole new series of articles... Geek Mirror: A window into the world of the Geek. If only this had been covered before Columbine... we could have saved those poor, innocent geeks who went on a murderous rampage because they just didn't look in their Geek Mirror enough. Those poor, poor boys.

    John, relax. You're not a geek, so top pretending. I don't know what a geek is, but fifty some odd year old men who think movies like the Beach, Scream 3, and High Fidelity are Geek Films most certainly ain't a geek.

    Try this. I've got a friend who thinks he's a geek, too. He's about to graduate with an english degree from Ohio State, and he thinks he's a geek by proxy. Ask him about it. You and he are cut from the same cloth, John. The difference is he's only 23 and he knows a bit more than how to find the fucking power switch. You can e-mail him at holtman.4@osu.edu. He'd love to hear from you. Maybe the two of you could come up with the next great geek book over a capuchino (sp) while you try and figure out how to decrease your web cache.

  • I agree completely. You do need to see both sides of the story for it to make sense, otherwise you're left with your initial assumption that Rob is a whiner.

    Besides, walking out on movies is lame. Really, what the hell else is going in your life that's so importnant that you can't wait out the last hour of a flick that you spent $8 on? I mean, that's like leaving a concert because the opening band sucked. Have a little patience, pal. I saw High Fidelity last night; my theater was packed, no one left (not even to use the bathroom), and everyone seemed to leave very satisfied at the end. Sucks that you didn't let yourself see a good movie all the way through.

  • EEben YAYleh.

    The H is silent.

    Benny

  • What's wrong about speaking german? I'm german.
  • I see your point -- if a movie's even moderately good, it seems more rational* to stay and hope for a bad payoff (depends on how much you paid). If it's horrible (see: One Tough Cop, Beyond Rangoon), leaving seems rational, but so does staying and wisecracking w/friends.

    I had a teacher who walked out on Pulp Fiction because he didn't want to see any more glamorization of violence. I never saw the flick, but from what I know, the end totally de-glamorized violence. Would my teacher have enjoyed the ending more, the movie more, if he'd stayed till the end? Maybe there are some things that some people just can't take -- violence, whining, casual sex -- and it's so disturbing and/or annoying to see these things that the negatives of staying outweigh the benefits of seeing a gret, meaningful and meaning-making ending.

    *rational = economically rational. So I'm taking Econ 2. so sue me -- wait! Economists would HATE that! Transaction costs, gov't interference in the market -- ugh.

  • Conversely, things have since gotten kind of shitty and tense between us, for reasons neither of us is airing.

    This advice is unsolicited, and worth every cent you paid for it: Talk to her! Start airing the reasons. This is a lesson I'm still learning, and I assure you it's a valuable one. Unless you conceal a black secret, discussing your problems never makes the situation worse. Failing to discuss them almost always makes things worse, as the imagination gets more and more elaborate trying to fill in the gaps.

    It's an avoidable mistake; I recommend avoiding it.

    Schwab

  • Does anyone know of a cheap way of transfering music to vinyl? There is a lot of music which never makes it to vinyl which I would like to scratch to. The only way I've heard of is having it mass-pressed (500+ copies).

    Thanks.
  • I'd be careful there. Shouldn't use the Geek Windex on that there monitor. According to my monitor manual, it contains some non-Geek ammonia that can be harmful to your screen.
  • it's a movie review, you dolt. it's all opinion!
  • none of those as good as buckaroo banzai across the 8th dimension!
  • by nickbray ( 165520 ) on Sunday April 02, 2000 @10:31AM (#1156237)
    Stephen Fear's High Fidelity is as good a movie as the l995 Nick Hornsby novel on which it is based.

    I didn't think the novel was a very good movie.
  • Accordin got this Slate review [msn.com] which doesn't recommend the film as much as I would, there are a whopping 59 songs heard in the movie, even though a number of them are only tiny clips. Too bad.

  • Typical. Take a good (or potentially profitable) story and set it in America because thats what the marketing men say. As a Londoner, I idendified very strongly with the novel and imagine it will loose a lot of this by being moved to America. The main character is a very English (in the way he is a total loser in the way only the English are) as are his attitudes.

    As a UK citizen who lived in and around London until I was 28, then moved to California, I have to disagree. High Fidelity isn't really about being English at all. Its themes apply to a whole generation of men. This really is one novel that I am expecting to translate well to an American setting

    Now, if I could just find enough time away from work to actually get to see the film...

  • Considering that CDs can cost as little as a few pennies to produce, I can't possibly see a reason to release anything in vinyl form especially since a huge amount of people don't even have a functioning record player.
  • Get a Vinyl-R drive and attach it to your computer.
  • Oh, fear not... this geek's monitor is pretty old, and suffers not from such non-geek damage.
  • Does anyone know of a cheap way of transfering music to vinyl? There is a lot of music which never makes it to vinyl which I would like to scratch to. The only way I've heard of is having it mass-pressed (500+ copies).

    A sort of "Vinyl-R" does indeed exist, in the form of the Vestax VRX 2000 vinyl cutting lathe. I'm not quite sure "cheap" is the correct word for it though, it costs £4000 and the special disks it eats are over £10 each. It's not out yet, so there is no information on Vestax's home page [vestax.co.uk] yet, but check out this preview [newzwire.com] -- it should be coming out this summer and prototypes are already floating around.

    Cheers,
    -j. (occasionally also known as DJ Gnosis)

  • You're missing the point totally. It may well "translate well to an American city" but why do they have to bother doing that? Its become fairly common for Hollywood to either take quality European literature and "Americanise" it and to take quality European films and remake them, magically suddenly set in America.

    I would like to think that the American public is not so dim that they can't accept a film set in another country. So why do it?

    I haven't seen "High Fidelity" - and living in Sweden I'll probably get to see it next year or so - but I hope to God it's not as bad as "The Beach". That film was "The Beach" in name and the fact that some people find a beach, the rest was something completely different.

    Books are set in certain places for a reason. If Nick Hornby thought that the book should have been set in Chicago then he would have set it there. If Alex Garland thought Richard should be an American and have a relationship with Francoise, then he would have written it. They are both good writers with imagination - they don't have to write about what they see about themselves, they can dream and write about that.

    And of course they have both said that they agree with the changes made in the film. What do you expect them to do? Publically criticise the film, thus meaning (a) it does worse at the box office and they lose book sales and (b) they have less chance of selling the movie rights to another of their books?

    I mean, come on. Wake up ....
  • In the movie, Rob completely reorganizes his entire record collection. Not alphabetically, not chronologically, but autobiographically.

    Also -- sorry for the digression here -- is anybody else here a Tenacious D fan? Barry from the movie is one of the band members, and I love their stuff... It's beautifully ridiculous. If only I still got HBO and knew when/if the 15 minute shows were on.

  • Considering that CDs can cost as little as a few pennies to produce, I can't possibly see a reason to release anything in vinyl form especially since a huge amount of people don't even have a functioning record player.

    If you're making a million Britney Spears albums off a single master, yes, CD is cheaper. But the cost of mastering a CD tends to be considerably higher, so for small runs (N Of course, in some specialty areas (like techno), you pretty much need to release vinyl or the DJs won't touch it. Only the better/more popular stuff ends up on CD, and that only long after release.

    Cheers,
    -j.

  • Thank you. Pretty expensive but interesting none the less.
  • Hornby's just towing the party line as to not damage box office receipts? Please.

    Authors refrain from supporting filmed versions of their works all the time. John Irving didn't say anything nice about "Simon Birch" ('inspired' by his "A Prayer for Owen Meany"). He didn't say anything mean, either, contrary to popular opinion. He simply distanced himself from the movie because he claimed that it was a different story from his own, to be judged on its own merits.

    In all liklihood, "High Fidelity" is set in Chicago because John Cusack took the project under his wing, wished to star in in, and decided that that's where he could make the story work. He probably wisely decided that he couldn't pull off the whole british "lad" thing and made it an American story.

    Besides, if the book is "quality literature", as you claim (personally, I loved the book & gave it to almost all of my close friends), it should be able to stand up to translocation. Shakespeare's survived far greater mangling. As others have pointed out, it's a pretty universal theme among men living in post-feminized cultures.

    This whine reminds me of New Yorkers attitudes towards the rest of the U.S., in particular their claim that people in the rest of the country could never really 'get' Seinfeld, because it was "too New York". Imagine their surprise when they found that most of my friends from Minnesota were far more into the show than they were, and picked up on even more of the humor (and we were Jewish, either - another strike!). Of course, all that exposure to MST3K has honed our comedy physiques.

    -BbT
    ===========
  • While it may exist on Mars, I think 'life' is too strong a word for Katz.

    :)
  • You have your opinion (John Cusack taking the project under his wing ...) and I have mine (Hollywood time and again bastardising European film and literature. Note that this is a criticism of Hollywood and not Americans, as my previous post hopefully communicated). I guess we're not going to agree there.

    However, I have to disagree that all quality literature can survive translocation. Many novels capture a mood, a feeling, a time and place. For example, could you ever see "On the Road" being set anywhere but America? I certainly can't - but if it did it would have to significantly change the subject matter.

    Another example is the yet to be made "Bridget Jones' Diary". OK, the idea of a single woman in the nineties looking for direction is not exactly original. What made the book was her outlook as a British woman. So many of her thoughts and actions were based on those that are integral to British society. It is another book that I believe will not stand up to being translocated - and I hope to God they don't.

    Maybe you would understand this "whine" (as you so politely put it) if more of your nation's art was butchered in the way that us Europeans have had to suffer for years now.

    "High Fidelity" may have a pretty universal theme, but the way that theme is protrayed, where they are and what they do is not so universal. They are set in a definite place and time.

    Finally, whether Shakespeare has survived greater mangling is questionable. Many novels and films based on the works of Shakespeare (who, let's face it, may not have been as original as we like to think anyway) have been chopped and changed so much they are barely recognisible. Is that "surviving"?
  • After seeing this movie last night, the thing I was most amused by was the performances by Jack Black (of Tenacious D [sidehatch.com] "fame") and Todd Louiso, the two music geeks that Cusak's character hires to work at the store. Their pompous sneering and amongst-themselves chuckling over the stupidity of their customers was, first and foremost incredibly accurate. If you've ever had snotty music friends, you'll recognize the smirk that comes onto Black's face when smacking down Louiso's "Belle and Sebastian" choice for Katrina Katrina's "Time to Feel Good". A friend of mine pointed out that back in the 80's when they showed off a "Subgroup" in a movie (Real Geniuses, Weird Science, etc..) they always talked them *up*, made them cooler. Now, they just show them for all their faults and defects and good points. Also, their reactions to da norms reminded me more than just a bit of regular geeks chatting amongst themselves. "Dude? You're playing Q3? What thehell? Go home and don't talk to me again until you're playing Unreal." :)

    Great movie, all around. Go see it.
    But you don't have to take my word for it:
    Salon's Review [salon.com]

  • You're missing the point totally.

    Right back at ya. I don't think I missed the point at all...

    It may well "translate well to an American city" but why do they have to bother doing that? Its become fairly common for Hollywood to either take quality European literature and "Americanise" it and to take quality European films and remake them, magically suddenly set in America.

    I can think of three or four examples of this. Hardly common...

    I would like to think that the American public is not so dim that they can't accept a film set in another country. So why do it?

    What, films like Notting Hill, Four Weddings and aa Funeral, Amadeus, Ghandi... There are plenty of films that succeed in the US that aren't set there.

    Books are set in certain places for a reason. If Nick Hornby thought that the book should have been set in Chicago then he would have set it there.

    This is just wrong. High Fidelity isn't really set in a place. Its about the characters not the specific place. That's why it does translate well. Of course some novels are strongly about place, but this isn't one of them. If you don't agree, I'd suggest 1) that you read the book (again) and 2) you read the interviews with Nick Hornby where he strongly makes this point. In other words, don't believe me, but you really ought to listen to the author.

    My guess, though I don't know this for sure, is the reason that Hornby set it in London and not Chicago is that's where he grew up. "Write about what you know". Similarly, when Cusack and the other writers of the movie adapted it to the screen, they set it in the millieu they knew - Chicago. Again, read the interviews that Cusack is giving. A film of a book should always have its own sensibility. I commend Cusack and the others for following theirs.

    And of course they have both said that they agree with the changes made in the film. What do you expect them to do? Publically criticise the film, thus meaning (a) it does worse at the box office and they lose book sales and (b) they have less chance of selling the movie rights to another of their books?

    Yeah, Hornby is that shallow and money-grubbing. Give the man some credit. Plenty of successful writers publically disagree with the film adaption of their works. Most of them simply don't publically comment on the resulting movie. Hornby has gopne out of his way to vocally and extensively talk about the film. Clearly he likes it and approves of it.

  • Gee, thanks for spoiling that one. If you think Bruce Springsteen isn't a major rock star, you've got no historical perspective on anything but the last decade or so. Just because someone isn't on the charts constantly doesn't mean they're not relevant. Springsteen still consistantly sells out his concertes and has scads of fans. Try looking beyond your own perspective. -Goliath
  • After extensive testing, I've found that the book does indeed stand up to translocation with no discernible ill effects.

    To test, I first translocated the book from my shelf to my coffee table, and then to my desk. I was unable to find any damage to the book, and the story was just as enjoyable as in its original setting.

    Furthermore, I am happy to report that, yes, my Shakespeare has survived far greater mangling as described above...

  • Not all Vinyl-obsessed geeks are DJ's. In my younger years, i bought used records by the truckload, and I've still got about 700 of the suckers. I've just recently bought a technics SL-1200MK2 (great bloody turntable!) and I havent listened to a CD since :)

    There's something about spinning wax that playing CD's and mp3's cant match. It's a tactile experience that brings back memories of the good 'ol days, especially when coupled with vinyl that I played when I was 14. Then again, I guess maybe I'm a bit older than the average slashdoter :)
  • Can you put anything on Slashdot as long as you have a tenuous link to what JonKatz likes to label "geeks"?

    Please, isn't Slashdot about technology? If it's trying to turn into Suck or Salon or any of a million other lame sites, please just say so and _I'll_ go away.
  • Why is it that so often when people like Katz speak outside of their area of expertise they sound so dumb? In this case, it's two parts Technocrat to one part cluelessness. I don't know what planet you exist on, but there are still not only plenty of record stores out there but also plenty of vinyl around. So that vinyl era that you obviously know nothing about may be marginalized, but hasn't passed. As someone who spent the last 12 years working in various record stores(though not any longer), I don't know where you think this plays out like the 50's but then I guess I shouldn't expect you to think through what you are writing about. Just go on making sweeping generalizations about things you nothing about. I have sold an awful lot of vinyl over those years and I bet Micheal Fremer of Stereophile would be surprised to find out that vinyl was a "long ago and far away age'. Even major labels still release limited edition vinyl.

    MP3's are fairly useless for those of us who want complete albums and something other than bootleg Mariah Carey singles or obscure electronica cuts. I don't know any record collectors who would dream of playing music through their computer. The sound sucks. This is where the technocrat problem comes into play. Those who exist in a world of technology sometimes assume that the rest of planet is as enamored of the technology du jour as they are. Just because Jeffy in the cartoon Family Affair makes a joke about checking his e-mail, doesn't mean that the nation at large has sold all their LP's and CD's and is living in the "MP3 era". Even most geeks I know (I'm referring to computer geeks here) buy and listen to mainly CD's. They might use MP3's to check something out but the RIAA and Katz nothwithstanding, we still live in the era of CD's.

    As others here have pointed out, there are still plenty of record stores out there, some with knowledgeable (and sometimes arrogant) employees, not that I was ever arrogant. I may have been a little impatient with some customers STUPID FSCKING QUESTIONS!!! but I always tried to help. Which is why I no longer work in records (that and the money sucks and the era of getting decent promos is past).

    Anyway, I am looking forward to this movie to relive a little bit of my RECENT past. I look forward to Katz's review of a movie sure to be made at some point about a group of crazy sys admins and their wacky shenanigans as they work the help desk at a major internet e-tailer. Perhaps that time, he will get it right.

    LETCHHAUSEN

    "I've got more Cramps bootlegs in this room than most people have records in their entire collections" - Byron Coley

  • can anyone list some of the music in the movie. I know the soundtrack is avaliable, but I was wondering about some of the other songs.
  • I've only seen the promos, but... is that Moby in the record store? One of the bald guys really, really looks like Moby.

    Just wondering.

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

  • Soundtracks never include all that crap. Because of copyright regulations, every copyrighted song must be mentioned in the end credits. So if some character gets drunk and belches the words to the "Three's Company" theme song, that song gets credited and royalties paid.

    IANAL, so YMMV. :)
  • Yep, Spot on Jon! The movie totally captured the feel of the book, and the location change worked well (I was dreading it beforehand).

    I'd read the book (plus "About a Boy") last November, and perhaps in the whiney limey kind of way totally identified :)

    Spoilers (?) I don't recall there being a bit about him becoming a music publisher in it ... plus wasn't he supposed to be an early 80's (punk/alt rock) DJ ?

    Other than that, it was the best movie adaptation of a book I've seen for a long time...

    oh, an his two sidekicks were so well matched with the characters in the book! Winton

  • For a decent indie/used record store (not a huge selection, but...) try Record Convergence, at the intersection of Route 50 and 29/236, right behind Office Depot. Its been there forever (as long as I remember anyway). Maybe I'll run in to you sometime
  • A whole lot of indie/just starting bands release 3-4 songs on a CD, sell it for $3-$6, just like a 7 inch.

    Spyky
  • Obsessive compulsives? Check. Tell me no-one here has never reorganized their CD collection

    I once ended a relationship (that was not going well in other areas) with a girl immediately after I caught her rearranging my cd collection. It is one of those things that simply could not be tolerated. Of course it was a final straw type intrusion, but...

    Even though she hadn't damaged much, I had to completely rearrange my collection before it felt 'right' again. Something like 400 cd's, including cd's she hadn't touched, had to be taken out of their leather binders and stacked in piles while waiting to be replaced in a suitable fashion.

    O-C behavior? heh. Try psychopathic. I like my cd's...

    Rev Neh
  • I think many of us can relate to the pain and anguish of being dumped or rejected by someone we desire (a best friend for example.. stupid dark one... but most of us get on with our lives. Anyone who has enough time to ponder over why their ex-girlfriend/boyfriend dumped them is just sad... That is for diaries and anoymous postings, jeez, when will people ever learn?!? The only thing funny about the movie was the low budget feel to the filming and the fact that it was not my trials and tribulations on the screen for the entire theatre to see...

    The only thing sure in life is the saltiness of tears...
  • It's probably cheaper to relocate the movie to an American city if an American movie studio is going to produce it.
  • It makes total sense to place the movie in Chicago. Chicago has tons of indie record stores [nwu.edu]. I'm certain that Cusack was thinking fondly of the Chicago record stores like Reckless Records [centerstage.net], The Quaker Goes Deaf [quakerdeaf.com], Vintage Vinyl [vintagevinyl.com], Gramaphone [gramaphonerecords.com], as well as dearly departed favorites like The Turntable, Wax Trax!, Pravda and Empire Records (no, not what the movie was named after).

    Even without the good reviews it's been getting, I'd go see it because it's so obvious from the previews that Cusack loves the same record stores I have.

  • I know this is off-topic in slashdot and all but did you say BEEFHEART FIRST EDITIONS ? And where can I get these things? Specifically where can I get Lick My Decals Off Baby , that I've been looking for for about five years now? I really would appreciate a pointer.

    Yours WDK - WKiernan@concentric.net

  • > German is very guteral and so even saying
    > "I love you" sounds like you're declaring war!

    Well, Christ, when you say "I love you" you are declaring war.

    Yours WD "purple heart" K - WKiernan@concentric.net

  • The sure sign of a recovering typewriter user.
  • On the other hand, "Fever Pitch", his novel about football (soccer), absolutely could not translate across the sea.

    Unless, of course, you set it in and around Green Bay, Wisconsin.

    Come to think of it, New England Revolution fans [pocm.com] -- that's the soccer team outside of Boston -- are an odd bunch as well.

  • Movie reviews...Finally something Katz can handle. I, for one, encourage Katz to stick to cinema reviews while leaving deeper issues to those capable of discussing them intelligently and rationally. Unfortunately, I doubt Katz will appreciate the suggestion and, of course, for some mysterious reason, SlashDot will continue to provide him with a soapbox.
  • I never felt that vinyl sounded better, i prefer the crisp clear sound of cd's to the scratchy "warmer" sound of lp's.
  • Does JonKatz even have an area of expertise?

  • > I agree with your analysis of Rob's problem.

    You're entirely right. Too much Maximum R&B twisted his little mind at an early age, and the end result was Slashdot.

    Oh - wait. I thought you were talking about Rob Malda.

    --
  • Hornby is also the author of _About_a_Boy_, a powerful read for anyone who was outcast from superpopulartrendyathleticspiffyelitesociety through school (wasn't that all of us?), and inspirational for anyone who has ever considered volunteering time to becoming a Big Brother / Big Sister...my application is in the mail.

    About a boy would have been an excellent add on for the price of being different articles/rants, but I hadn't read it and so couldn't recommend it then.

  • There is no comparison. American football fans can be wacky, but European and Latin American (real) football mania is profoundly different in style, magnitude, and significance. Loyalty to club is gang loyalty in a way that team loyalty can never approach. For one thing, real football teams don't move.

    I think of teams like the Boca Juniors of Buenos Aires, or Flamingo of Rio de Janiero, or the Alianza of Lima, or Corinthians of Sao Paulo (or my family's team - Melgar of Arequipa, the only professional sports team I can think of named after a composer.) - these things are like a cult and a gang identity combined, and I am not being hyperbolic.

    Hornby's book is not, it should be emphasized, about hooliganism, either. While the hooligans are an indication of how strong the football cult is, it is only a sad fraction of the whole picture.

    I know Green Bay fans, and they are an enthusiastic bunch, but there's no contest. The story could not translate.

  • Hmmm. I kinda agree. I saw High Fidelity this afternoon and almost walked out. Am I gay? No, Im happily married.

    Lets take a little musical diversion, it seems appropriate. My favorite band used to be Dinosaur Jr. J Mascis provided my soundtrack for my high school days. Anyone familiar with their work can back me on this: It sounds a whole lot better when youre lonely. They lyrics make sense and the distortion blurs the pain. Meeting my wife five years ago reduced my dinophilicity. The music hadnt changed, but I had. Lyrics that seemed to describe my here and now became distant and intangible. I enjoyed it less because I was in a different place.

    I had the same feelings about High Fidelity. The main character was too distant from my experience for him to be the whole story. The people who will like this film are the ones who can relate to the main story. Otherwise youre left looking for something else to focus on. There were some bright spots outside the relationship saga, but they were pretty spread out. Your enjoyment of this film is all about what you bring to the party.

    -BW
  • A slightly better analogy would be having a complete brand-new Athlon system built except the graphics card (you have no spares, so the system is dead), but finding out the GeForce you just ordered won't be arriving for another two weeks because the store you ordered it from online didn't actually have them in stock like their webpage said. And guess what? You're only computer at the moment is a Pentium 90 laptop!

    True story. ;)
  • The novel was awful, if only because the protagonist was a whiny, self-absorbed loser.

    Not much character development going on there.

    And as for the weird indy music bits, there was more depth in the Berkeley college punk scene, which isn't saying a lot. /html

  • I am astounded that anyone would even enter a theater and pay money to see a movie like this. I've seen the 2 minute trailor, and 'High Fidelity' is so obviously a formulaic 80's love movie with the usual 2 or 3 variables thrown in. In this instantiation of LoveStory, foo = "old records" and bar = "John Cusack." And of course the whole class implements Predictable: Lemme guess- John Cusack gets the girl in the end... Who gives a shit?

    My definition of a hippocrite is someone who complains about the movie 'Junior,' a movie about Arnold Schw. getting pregnant. This is the best possible movie that could be made about this innane subject matter. People are like, "hey, I saw that movie and it SUCKED!!" I say: "What the hell do you expect?? You went to see a movie about Arnold getting pregnant!"

    Retards...

  • ... when your girlfriend is about to dump you?

    when you come home and find her taping all your albums.


    Paul M

    "There are no innocent bystanders
    What where they doing there in the first place"

  • Slightly O.T., but since a lot of threads debate it, here's my 2

    I'm very disappointed in the state of commercial audio formats these days. CDs sound cleaned, sampled, starched, digitized and seem to lack "feeling". Tapes always sucked, but they let you bring your music into the car back in the 70s and 80s before car CD players. Now with the thought of DVD-Audio, I'm apalled- MP3s are nice, but we're going to have some level of "digital mangling" in our audio? (read: DVD uses all sorts of compression which does a good job, but is NOT PURE.)

    This is why I long for Vinyl. I'm still one of those "geeks" who listens to records (and yes, I own that fantastic Technics record player too. Best turntable I ever bought!). Without trying to bore you people too much, here are a few reasons why I feel the way I do about vinyl (and why this movie hits a heart string)
    (By the way, if you're not an audiophile, you probably don't understand half of this)

    • Analog - its the real image of the sound wave, not a digitally reconstructed image of it.
    • Broader frequency range - yes, believe it or not, with a good record player and a good record, it is capable of having a 10Hz - 30,000KHz frequency range where a CD only is capable of doing 20Hz - 28,000KHz. Ever play a 45RPM? (note: I'm not sure of the exact high frequencies, but I am sure of the low frequencies)
    • Classical music sounds better on it (a deep cello has no soul on a CD)
    • The artwork. This you cannot debate - I was devastated the day I saw my favorite record albums reduced from their 12" x 12" (or 12" x 24" if you talk gatefold) to some folded up crappy 5.5" CD image. The only good thing they had was when CDs first came out and had those enormous (and useless) cardboard boxes, they partially salvaged some albums (e.g. Jimi Hendrix)

    It's a tough argument, but there is just something lost. I personally feel there is still quite a bit to experiencing a good record versus an impersonal CD. True, it is more convenient to have CDs and they're less delicate than LPs, but I digress..

    It's funny how few of today's kids (teenagers and younger) may have never seen a record before; same idea as my watching a young kid stand befuddled at a rotary pay phone back 10 years ago (honestly had no idea how to work it).

    Oh well. Rant off.

    --

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Working...