- Enable open source developers to monetize their apps on every other Linux distribution
And right there it went down the drain.
Linux developers have been paid for decades. Just not for their code. They've been hired as developers are turned their skill into professions with code being their CV.
Moreover, we have half a century of science proving that getting paid literally destroys the motivation of volunteer work. We have countless studies showing that volunteers work better, longer, to higher standards and with more happiness to themselves then paid workers do.
Please let this project crash and burn, because otherwise that's the end of Linux.
Windows 7 users will feel right at home then.
They record on which button I click?
Preposterous!
If user apps can keep the OS from shutting down, the problems run MUCH deeper.
1 and 2 are great if you're running critical infrastructure. If it's just important to your company, go nuts. If it's something important, it's important enough to require the laying on of hands.
I doubt very much that #3 is industry practice. It might be recommended practice, but I doubt all the scada hacking you hear about is going through that kind of system.
I may not have your 'permission'. But I have your plug in my hand.
You are missing half of the interesting stuff you can do with JavaScript
Thanks for the link to the Montgomery video - would have never found this myself and it corrected some serious misconceptions I had about digital signals and signal processing.
EKANS malware and its attempt to cease particular industrial-related processes is further evolution and context around the growing cyber threat to industrial control systems, but EKANS itself is more a novelty than a discrete and worrying risk.
On top of that it's written in Go. I'm reminded of the days when viruses were written is visual basic.
The "I'm not a robot" pop ups work by knowing you are logged in in google or FB or elsewhere
A tablet has no mouse movement
The internet isn't static text and graphics anymore.
I stand by what I wrote. If your web site needs Javascript to show at all or to show pictures (above or below the fold), then you're a waste of oxygen. Comment posted with Javascript disabled, as requested.
DENVER (CBS4) – Colorado will enjoy a brief break in the snow on Saturday thanks to a slight shift in the jet stream pattern. That will allow partly to mostly sunny skies along with warmer temperatures into the afternoon. But things will change after sunset as the next storm dives into the Great Basin and
If you plant a seed from a Fuji apple, the tree that grows from it won't produce Fuji apples; it may well produce some kind of crabapple.
As Fuji apples are grown in plantations, chances are the flower the fruit came from was inseminated by another Fuji apple flower -> the seeds will grow Fuji apple trees.
I mean shit, you could be completely correct and I wouldn't know it because you've completely failed to form a coherent argument.
You continue to baffle me. HOW DID THEY RIG THEIR OWN CANDIDATES? At no point have to clearly stated in your own words what rigged the election against Bernie.
Plus your "me" is not accurate at all. "Some one whose name I don't know said something I can't remember" is not any kind of compelling point of debate. After that you get all testy over you actually having to (oh heavens!) site sources.
I really can't tell if you're trolling or if you truly are this fucking stupid.
You lapse into pettiness once again. You really have no concept of how to form a coherent point of debate do you? You keep telling me you've made some sort of point but you've literally told me nothing. The articles you posted do not describe rigging, they describe the Democratic party favoring one candidate over another in some sort of nebulous fashion but yet there is not a single case of vote rigging. Changing votes, changing how votes are counted, steering voters away, this is vote rigging. What you need to do is to clearly enunciate your point and explain in your own words exactly how the election was rigged. I don't know why this is hard for you. What were the exact actions that "rigged" the vote?
Intel has this stupid fixation on Gnome, which already bit them in the ass before when they got involved in crushing the formerly vibrant Maemo project in part by changing out its excellent KDE desktop for the monumentally brain damaged Gnome project, that old shuffling zombie duck taped together with horrid GTK and libglib crap in marginally maintainable C-trying-to-OOP. Did Intel learn? Nope.
Well, not much. If you install Clear Linux "desktop" package you get Gnome. If you install "desktop-kde" you get KDE. Intel almost learned. But the fact that it defaults to Gnome makes me confident that Clear Linux is already well on its way to obscurity, just like Moblin. That's what happens when Intel, Samsung and the Linux Foundation get together to pool their collective cluelessness without bothering to consult the actual community.
This is what science was meant for. Now find me some Ambrosia!
"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry
