Seafile. Got it. Thank you.
By comparing them to those to the south of them?
I cannot argue with that. So, let's say, "relatively level-headed" compared to the world's most violent people with indoor plumbing.
What makes you believe that?
Well, the main firearm for police is the sidearm. The weight that a suppressor adds makes the gun more difficult to handle. Granted, my only experience is with the old fashioned suppressors with the rubber grommets, but I don't think the new suppressors are that much lighter. Additional weight at the muzzle of a handgun may not matter in target shooting (my forte) but it really matters in tactical situations.
When you hear the evidence that suppressors make a weapon more accurate, it's always in reference to a stationary firing position.
Also, the new types of suppressors are much less effective in quieting a weapon. Even the volume of a suppressed weapon is enough to cause hearing damage (it's the attack portion of the envelope that causes the damage as much as it is the volume).
Of course, this is not viable so long as silencers remain regulated and taxed as heavily as they currently are in US (much more so than guns themselves).
I'm pretty sure the suppressor regulations are local, not national, by the way.
If anything, local police are too eager to go to their weapon to solve a problem as it is. I'm not sure you want to encourage more of it by making gunfire quieter.
Something like that:
Just FYI, even a single round fired causes permanent hearing damage, which is why wearing hearing protection is required on pretty much any firing range regardless of how many people are there.
They're using silencers on the firing range? What's wrong with regular ear protectors?
It would certainly be a very good thing for police to have and use silencers consistently, in light of the fact that they do occasionally use their firearms in public, and this negatively affects the health of every single person on the scene.
Yes, we have plenty of evidence that police using firearms in public negatively affects the health of people at the scene.
Especially if you happen to be of a certain shade.
But still, both of the main types of suppressors negatively affect both control of the firearm and impact on the target, and some accuracy. Why would you want police to have less control of their firearm, less stopping power, and less accuracy?
Let's not pretend that the DoD equipment being shipped to local police forces has anything to do with improving policing or protecting people's safety.
"ls" on Unix used to do that (alphabetize across columns). I think it was fixed mid-80's.
If you want real control, it's ownCloud or no cloud I think...
I've been meaning to ask someone about this. Is OwnCloud something that someone who's kind of a moron could set up on their own server? Asking for a friend.
Maybe not a moron, I mean, I've set up Apache and a media server, and I can read instructions when I'm sober. I just worry that I'll do something wrong and end up syncing my data with some Estonian hackers by mistake.
And who knows, I didnt care to read tfa, but they couldve developed a nice algorithm like that new hit show I cant remember the name of
Because the cause of most gang violence is the war on drugs. End that and the violence will plummet
I'm all for ending the war on drugs. Along with stricter gun laws, it will put a serious dent in the number of innocent people who get shot every year.
Link to Original Source
Looks like it is out in more than just the report. More news agencies are publishing extra details.
The news agencies are pointing out the brand (Hospira) and the exact models of devices that are Internet-controllable. They mention the type of signals that need to be sent (multiple commands to infuse the drug) and they discuss the security measures already in place.
It seems the only thing they left out of news stories is the actual payload.
Link to Original Source
This statement comes so late... The security community has been saying that for years! What happened to forward-thinking?
In the engineering community that is so standard it entered into the common usage. "Fail safe", meaning that for any failure you need to go to the safe option. A gate or switch or lock should either fail open or closed, which one is safe depends on the circumstances.
On a more prophetic note, the story two weeks ago predicting the first online murder by the end of the year seems that much closer. The reports nearly give explicit instructions.
Seems like this Billy Rios researcher identified the problem but didn't kill anyone with it. But he could have if he wanted. Someone else could read the details and figure they are anonymous enough to flip the switch just for grins and giggles.
and if we don't count gangland violence
And if you don't count death, we all live forever.
Why the hell wouldn't you count "gangland" violence? We've got more people in prison than any other country in the world, so when I hear people talk about how there is really little violent crime (except for the violent crime) in the US, it's kind of a joke.