Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Consistency vs. Flexibility (Score 1) 551

by zaphod_bee4 (#9733245) Attached to: Software Usability As A Technical Problem
The value of consistency is that the default will just work. Consistency allows someone to learn a system. Customization allows them to tailor it to themselves. Both are important. I like being able to set up custom hotkeys in my apps. I also like being able to go to my friends computer and work immediately using hotkeys that have been defined consistently across the user interface.

One of the big UI issues of recent note has been the GNOME Spatial nautilus change. Gnome Developers broke the consistency rule. As a result they angered and confused some of their current users. The issue wasn't really whether or not Spatial nautilus was useable or not it was that the users suddenly had a radical change in a crucial feature of their UI. They would have been better off phasing it in slowly. Make it a feature not turned on by default. Then the first time a user turned on Gnome after upgrading he still felt at home. He could turn it on later but the initial shock of "Whoah!!!! what did you do to my file manager" would have been avoided. Most "users" don't like being shocked or surprised by their applications.

Consistency up front and flexibility can be taken advantage of later.

365 Days of drinking Lo-Cal beer. = 1 Lite-year

Working...