Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Carroll & Ostlie (Score 1) 234

by zap1992 (#47939375) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How To Pick Up Astronomy and Physics As an Adult?
As a current astronomy student, I would simply recommend that you read An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics by Carroll and Ostlie. I've heard it said that it contains about 90% of everything any astronomer knows, with the other 10% being specialization. Once you've read through most of it, you'll at least be able to follow most astronomy papers. If you're comfortable with simple calculus and basic physics, you shouldn't have too much trouble with it.

Comment: Re:Gravity isn't SF (Score 1) 180

by zap1992 (#47721217) Attached to: The 2014 Hugo Awards
It really doesn't involve any more science than any other movie, and I would hardly consider simply using science to be the defining characteristic of SF. SF uses science, or pretends to, in fantastic ways that are not currently possible in order to tell a story--usually one about the ramifications of fictional science or technology. Sending astronauts into low Earth orbit is not only possible, it's routinely done.

Comment: Gravity isn't SF (Score 1) 180

by zap1992 (#47720547) Attached to: The 2014 Hugo Awards

Gravity isn't science fiction. We actually do send people into space, and that kind of disaster could sort of happen. There's no speculative science, predictions of the future, or fantasy elements to it. And that's really cool--what seems so much like SF is actually a real-life job that some people do everyday.

Comment: Re: The universe is probably teeming with life, bu (Score 1) 608

by zap1992 (#46838347) Attached to: Are Habitable Exoplanets Bad News For Humanity?

And intelligent life is even rarer still. In 4 billion years of evolution, intelligent life (i.e., intelligent enough for high technology) has only evolved once and has only been around a few million years. But I don't think we're in serious danger of extinction any time soon. We're extremely adaptable, and once we establish self-sustaining colonies on other worlds, it's very unlikely that any act of nature will kill us off. That means the only plausible threat to our survival is ourselves, and we've been getting less violent throughout our history. That trend probably won't reverse any time soon.

I suspect that, once intelligent life does evolve, it probably survives more often than not. That means there probably aren't many species anywhere near our level of technology, as most are probably much, much older than us.

Comment: Tidal forces (Score 1) 84

by zap1992 (#45589411) Attached to: How Much of ISON Survived Its Closest Approach To the Sun?
While the Sun's heat probably played a role in ISON's destruction, I think the main reason it broke up was because of the Sun's tidal forces. ISON was within its Roche limit, where the tidal effects of the Sun were enough to overpower ISON's own gravity, tearing the comet apart. Most of it is probably orbiting the Sun right now as a very small ring.

+ - Optical memory in glass could record the last evidence of civilization-> 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Using nanostructured glass, scientists at the University of Southampton have demonstrated the recording and retrieval processes of five dimensional digital data by femtosecond laser writing. The storage allows unprecedented parameters including 360 TB/disc data capacity, thermal stability up to 1000C and practically unlimited lifetime."
Link to Original Source

+ - What's actually wrong with DRM in HTML5? ->

Submitted by kxra
kxra (2826067) writes "The Free Culture Fondation has posted a thorough response to the most common and misinformed defenses of the W3C's Extended Media Extensions (EME) proposal to inject DRM into HTML5. They join the EFF and FSF in a call to send a strong message to the W3C that DRM in HTML5 undermines the W3C’s self-stated mission to make the benefits of the Web “available to all people, whatever their hardware, software, network infrastructure, native language, culture, geographical location, or physical or mental ability.” The FCF counters the three most common myths by unpacking some quotes which explain that 1. DRM is not about protecting copyright. That is a straw man. DRM is about limiting the functionality of devices and selling features back in the form of services. Second, that DRM in HTML5 doesn’t obsolete proprietary, platform-specefic browser plug-ins; it encourages them. And third, that the Web doesn’t need big media; big media needs the Web."
Link to Original Source

Comment: I don't understand why it's still around (Score 1) 417

by zap1992 (#43185983) Attached to: If I could (or had to) ban texting in one place ...

It doesn't make any sense to me. It's a very limited, antiquated, and error-prone medium. Now that so many people have smartphones that are capable of email and IM, it doesn't really make sense that we should continue to use this. Why should I be forced to use such a tiny computer because you're not at your desk?

(I assume that "texting" refers specifically to SMS text messaging, as most people use the term, not as any message containing text.)

Comment: Probably not worth the cost (Score 1) 322

by zap1992 (#42888893) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What Features Belong In a 'Smartwatch'?
With all the features people want in this thing, the battery will probably have to be pretty big or you won't get much use out of it. (It will be enough of a change to have to plug my watch in every night; I don't want to have to do it every few hours.) Which means the only way anyone is going to release something like this is if it has very limited features--maybe just time, date, a few basic alerts, etc., which means it probably won't be worth the cost. But then again, people will spend $500 on a watch that keeps worse time than the one that came with my breakfast cereal, so you never know.

+ - John E. Karlin, Who Led the Way to All-Digit Dialing, Dies at 94->

Submitted by g01d4
g01d4 (888748) writes "Who was John E. Karlin? “He was the one who introduced the notion that behavioral sciences could answer some questions about telephone design,” according to Ed Israelski, an engineer who worked under Mr. Karlin at Bell Labs in the 1970s. And you thought Steve Jobs was cool. An interesting obituary in the NYT."
Link to Original Source

All the simple programs have been written.