Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Google+ (Score 1) 321

I'm willing to wait as long as it takes for my friends to be granted access.

That's where I'm at too. On FB I only friend people I've met in real life, unless they're relatives I haven't met yet (due to the fact that my immediate family moved from Europe to New Zealand when I was 5).
Lot's of them are not techies, so I'm not sure if they'll ever move to G+. I will be giving them every encouragement though.

Yuri

Comment: Re:Google+ (Score 2) 321

[Google +] lacks a "killer feature" though that would make anyone use it over FB. Unless it gets something that will make people use it over using FB, it will probably languish, then die like Wave, Google Health, etc.

* Hangouts (up to 10 people in a video chat room)
* Circles (a method for fine-tuning whose posts appear in your stream and who can see your posts)
* Absence of FarmVille etc.

Those are killer features for me.

Comment: Re:The number of devices is not most relevant (Score 2) 346

by yuri benjamin (#36069910) Attached to: Making Wireless, Not Ethernet, the Heart of the Network

As I always said,
Do not underestimate the bandwidth of a pack mule loaded with DAT tapes.
Or an African swallow carrying an SD card.

Or two African swallows carrying a 2TB portable drive between them (assuming a 2TB portable drive is about as heavy as a coconut).

Comment: Re:KDE is really good now.. (Score 1) 105

by yuri benjamin (#36055216) Attached to: KDE 4.6.3 Released

> KDE has improved *greatly* since its 4.4.x days. It is a lot snappier, less buggy and doesn't clutter up your desktop like it used to.

[snip]

So, from the 4.0 days that made me curse it after how nice 3.5 was, I have to say, they have me hooked again.

4.0 is what made me ditch KDE. Now running gnome-based LinuxMint and loving it. I might try KDE again in a few years, but I was badly burnt by moving from 3.5.x to 4.0 so there will have to be a compelling reason to go back.

Comment: Re:The will to be free (Score 1) 648

by yuri benjamin (#35731026) Attached to: Bashing MS 'Like Kicking a Puppy,' Says Jim Zemlin

The letter isn't the issue - the issue is at the device should be at the absolute root of the file system. I don't care if you call the pen-drive G:, pendrive or bubblegumpopannoyingnamesomething, but don't put it somewhere that isn't *immediately* visible...

The only place where it is *immediately* visible is if it appears as an icon on the desktop or opens in a new file manager window as soon as you insert the storage medium. Both Windows and Linux (gnome/KDE) can be set up to do this.

In Windows, to find the drive letters I have to go to "My Computer" or something like that. In Linux, KDE and gnome both have an equivalent to "My Computer" that shows all mounted storage media.

Both are equally visible.

Comment: Re:The will to be free (Score 1) 648

by yuri benjamin (#35730526) Attached to: Bashing MS 'Like Kicking a Puppy,' Says Jim Zemlin

Aw, c'mon. Any user who has only used Linux systems will call the Windows method weird. At least the Linux FIlesystem Heirarchy is logical.

Bullshit. My computer file systems are based on the storage devices they're hosted on - the storage devices ARE the root of the system. How is making an imaginary / root directory and then putting the storage media in some folder more logical than directly showing the drives?

How is some random letter more logical than /media/pendrive or /media/dvd, which is where a pendrive or DVD get mounted automagically on any modern linux distro?

Science

+ - Nuclear power is safest way to make electricity->

Submitted by schwit1
schwit1 (797399) writes "Compared with nuclear power, coal is responsible for five times as many worker deaths from accidents, 470 times as many deaths due to air pollution among members of the public, and more than 1,000 times as many cases of serious illness, according to a study of the health effects of electricity generation in Europe."
Link to Original Source
Android

+ - Pirated Android App Shames Freeloaders->

Submitted by
MojoKid
MojoKid writes "A pirated version of an Android app is actually a Trojan that shames someone who installs it by sending an SMS message to all his/her contacts telling them of his/her piracy. The original app is called Walk and Text, and costs $2.10 in the Android Market. The app uses the camera on the back of a smartphone to show a user a visual of his upcoming surroundings, which will supposedly prevent the user from running into the street or across a set of train tracks. The pirated version is available from unofficial Android app markets, and once installed redirects the pirate to the legitimate app in the Android Market, while also sending the SMS message to the phone's entire contact list."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Good for US economy (Score 1) 617

by yuri benjamin (#35624300) Attached to: MS Wants Laws To Block Products Made By Software Pirates

I am opposed because it moves the burden of policing software licence compliance to businesses who may have little or no control over their overseas suppliers and who are not in the business of law enforcement.

It doesn't affect me personally. I live in New Zealand. In addition to my full time job (linesman for the local phone company) I also have a small organic market garden. Our accounts are done in OpenOffice running on Linux, so no compliance issues for us. In any case, we supply local supermarkets and do not export to the USA.

Comment: Re:Good for US economy (Score 1) 617

by yuri benjamin (#35623754) Attached to: MS Wants Laws To Block Products Made By Software Pirates

Purchasing products made by a company that is out of compliance with their software licences is not the same as purchasing stolen goods.

I think there are similarities, namely the ones that I highlighted

This is where I have to disagree.

Scenario 1: I buy bolts from a manufacture that has stolen the raw materials (eg steel) in order to make the bolts.

Scenario 2: I buy bolts from a manufacture that uses stolen software to track their stock.

You are lumping these two scenarios together. In reality they are totally different.

Yes I agree I should return bolts made from stolen materials, but the second scenario is nothing at all like that. If you are the legal owner of said stock tracking software and you come to me demanding redress for the actions of the manufacturer, with whom my only relationship is buying bolts to use in my product, I think you can guess where I'd tell you to go. Any law that lets you go after me in the second scenario is lacking in common sense.

"Lead us in a few words of silent prayer." -- Bill Peterson, former Houston Oiler football coach

Working...