I'd shamefully abide if I could figure out how to come anywhere NEAR the usage cap. What on earth are you doing? I consume a lot of streaming media -- Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, Xfinity, Youtube, Pandora -- on a Roku, two laptops, a couple of Android and iOS devices, and various family members rotate in and out with whatever toys they bring. I'm using about a quarter of my limit. Hitting the usage cap is probably nature's way of telling you to go outside and look at the real world.
There are occasionally exceptions where people *need* to remain anonymous for fear of lawsuits or termination from their jobs
This is not nearly so rare as you imagine.
At some point you just spend $130 and buy an Android tablet at wally world. Or a $50 Roku.
Whoever even bothered to write the article in the first place needs to lose his license to write tech journalism.
If you start applying standards to tech journalism there won't be any left.
The right question is: How do we erase this scourge forever, including all of the compromised bot-infested Windows machines around the world?
Amazon's streaming service is flaky with linux. The issue is DRM which for some reson is not supported in the linux version of the flash player.
Amazon video works fine under Ubuntu. Use Firefox, not Chrome.
From the FAQ
Why can't I watch videos on my Chrome browser in Linux?
The Flash Player Plugin in Chrome removed support for Digital Rights Management (DRM) in Linux as part of the upgrade from 11.3 to 11.4. This upgrade was bundled with the latest Chrome 22 update for Linux. If you applied the Chrome update, you are no longer able to watch DRM-protected content, such as movies and TV episodes. Trailers are unaffected as they do not use DRM. To get around this issue, you can use a different browser, such as Firefox. For information on Chrome and the Flash Player plug-in, see: https://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=108086.
Wikivoyage is largely a fork of Wikitravel, which has been around for years, but is under the control of a private business.
(2) if it exists, it violates causality;
That would seem to be a problem, but maybe it contains its own solution.
I want my mail and calendar wherever I am. So why keep multiple copies of gigabytes of mail on multiple machines.
Somebody should invent IMAP.
Absentee voting already works this way pretty much everywhere in the United States:
First, you have to already be registered, so the notion that nonexistent people are suddenly able to vote is nonsense.
Second, you must file a request to get the absentee ballot. In most states you do not have to show any form of ID to do so, but your name is checked against the registration records before any ballot is provided.
Third, you fill out the ballot form, sign it, and mail it in. Note that the signature means your ballot is not really "secret."
Fourth, the forms are checked against the registration rolls again when they are counted, and signatures also may be checked (usually a sampling are spot-checked). In many places, absentee votes are counted AFTER the live votes and they may even be skipped if the number of absentee votes would not change the outcome of the election. If a voter has voted at his or her precinct, and an absentee ballot from the "same" voter shows up, that's an obvious case of fraud and the ballot is set aside.
There is no reason to imagine that email makes this any less secure than the snail mail system.
How does this compete with netbooks, such as an Acer Aspire with Windows 7 Home Edition for under $238?
I just checked Acer's website and the range of list prices for Aspire models is $349.99 through $1,299.99.
This is absolutely right. $249 LIST is a breakthrough price, even though some people are too thick to see that. Occasionally you'll find an 11.6 Acer on clearance or special in that price range (and if you do, BUY IT and install Linux), but over $300 is more typical.
The 11.6 size is a sweet spot. I have an Acer 1410 and my wife has an AO725, both running Ubuntu. It's rare that either of us does anything that couldn't be done with the Chromebook -- except for moving photos from an SD card to a hard drive. I know it's simple to plug either into a Chromebook. What I don't know is whether the ChromeOS UI plays nicely with external storage.
No. You probably can install a Kindle reader app, but you can't watch Amazon video on a rooted device.
But as a Kindle Fire user and a veteran of much smartphone hacking
Standards are well accepted on the Internet...
Tell me sir, what flavors of html and css your browser support? Which versions it supporys correctly? What addations to those standards ithas made for its own use?
SLS (SoftLanding Systems), the very first Linux distro, downloaded at 1200bps from Sunsite. Recompiled the kernel every week from alpha sources. Ran it on a '386, then upgraded to a fire-breakthing 33-mhz '486.
Then RedHat on a Pentium.
Then Mandrake when I couldn't get RedHat to run on a particular box.
Then Android. Does that count?
I've been a Linux user for a few years now and while I've seen great strides made in desktop aesthetics and usability, I still can't with a pure conscious say that any of the DEs are as good as or better than what comes on Windows or OSX. Windows is without a doubt snappier and the taskbar has a lot of nifty and intuitive features.....
I know YMMV, but my experience has been exactly the opposite. Every time I boot my wife's Acer laptop into Windows 7, I'm just appalled at how spongy the UI feels, how slow it is to load programs, and how truly awful the fonts look. I suppose I could get used to it if it was my only option, but I find nothing "intuitive" about anything in the system, and anything I remember from the XP era just gets me into trouble.
As quickly as possible, I get back to the safety, security, performance and -- yes -- usability of Ubuntu.
I'm not pleased by Unity, but I am able to restore and reconfigure Ubuntu to a proper working desktop that acts mostly like Gnome 2. I'll be keeping an eye on the Gnome Remix. It may become a future option.