wiedzmin writes: Twitter filed a surprisingly feisty motion (.pdf) this week in New York City Criminal Court to quash a court order demanding that it hands over information and tweets of one of its account holders to law enforcement. The company stepped in with the motion after the account holders effort to quash the order, claiming 4th Amendment protections was rejected, by the judge claiming that online content stored on a third-party server was not physical and therefore did not have the same privacy protections. To add insult to injury, the judge claimed that account holder had no standing to fight the order because agreeing to the Twitter's terms of service, “demonstrated a lack of proprietary interests in his [own] Tweets”. Twitter fired back at the New York court, rebuking many points made by the judge, pointing out his mistakes in selective quoting of their Terms of Service and lashing out at prosecutors for wasting everyone's time by requesting the court to grant access to public Tweets, which could have been easily printed out from the site. The American Civil Liberties Union applauded Twitter’s move.