This doesn't make sense. Laws forbid you to utter slanderous statements. Other laws forbid you to utter "fire" in a theatre. In both cases, I can commit the offense. So either slander laws *do* limit speech or the "don't shout fire in a theatre" does *not* limit free speech. Which is it?

I think you mean an adult can ingest anything he wants so long as it does not harm
others (suppose I ingest substance A and B which together form a powerful explosive,
right beside YOU. Do I have the right to ingest A and B. I think not).

Now, we should have a *meaningful* discussion of whether **some** drugs are such
that there consumption harms others to a sufficient degree to warrant prohibiting their
ingestion.

I think it is completely obvious that marijuana poses no such risk; not so sure
about crack cocaine (and, from another angle, potential cognitive enhancers,
steroids for athletes etc.)

system requirements for inkling

Windows 7, Vista or XP (SP3, 32 or 64 bit versions),
Mac OS 10.5+ (and Intel Processor)

I didn't spend very long looking either

"Did the primary buffer panel just fall off my gorram ship for no apparent reason?!"

" IPS display" - you can make up fantasy machines that compete
with mac air, but the x1 carbon does NOT have IPS display (as
the thinkpad forums abundantly demonstrate)

You point is intriguing. How many "hole years" are in a century?

mod up - important information

there are two papers: the Van-Gheem et.al. paper you cite and then there is the
one the slashdot article is about, which is:

Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. by Avendaño C, Mata A, Sanchez Sarmiento CA, Doncel GF.

The authors are the Argentineans which the linked article mentions.

It's (to be) published in Fertility and Sterility.

So I basically don't know what you're going on about ...

I think this must be the most obtuse
comment I've ever seen on slashdot
(which is saying a lot).

so you really think this 900 km tunnel
exists, do you?

It is thinking such as that exhibited here -- at least judging by how it is
expressed -- which is more the problem than the solution.

That's a compromise I can't live without.

so what does that mean exactly?

The MoFos represented Novell in the SCO suit.

And between them and Boise and Co dragged
it out for about 7 years and perhaps 40
million dollars of legal fees

With all my **hearth** I hope this will open your eyes.

no ... I expect with all the smoke you'll just blind them :)

"They seem to make a significant difference in residuntial areas"

I like that - there should be a area where all the dunces live.