An anonymous reader writes: A french court of law has banned the press from publishing topless photos of the so-called Princess Kate of Britain. (Please note: the US Constitution expressly does not recognize titles of nobility and peerage.) The photos were made using tele-lenses while standing on publicly available pedestrian paths.
How come it is banned to display topless members of the "Saxo-Coburg-Gotha" dynasty, a 150 year old german concoction that pretends to be "House of Windsor" to mislead the born britons, yet media is allowed and encouraged to display and over-report heinous internet video accusations against Mohammed, the 1300 years old founding prophet of the 900+ million strong islamic religion?
How could the republican France of revolutionary fame sink so low as to kiss the toe of british monarchs? Where is liberty and where is egality, when the monarchs are "more equally" protected from the consequences of their own silly, lewd conduct?
I hope Wikileaks and Anonymous will stand up to publish each and every Kate photo in the original RAW resolution, all around the web. President Obama should also speak up and condemn the FR-GB censorshhip pact, because the 1st Amendment guarantee of free speech and of the press is either universally sancto-sanct or just a piece of paper to wipe derriere. It cannot be both ways at the same time, one for the itinerant merchant's daugher created princess and another for a widely revered Prophet, who founded a world religion. That is a paradox the unveils the greed and hubris of "free world" elite!