Comment: C# (Score 1) 418
In 2005 I was a successful vb developer having lived and breathed basic since my freshman year in hs 1980.
A funny story:
It was 1988, my mentor from Brookhaven National Laboratory was pestering me over using QuickBasic 4.5 versus Borland Turbo C. He wrote two programs that compared the efficiency of each language and showed me the results. The C guys would tell you the results. Well when I looked at the code:
Keep in mind I'm using C# so it isn't C but to a VB programmer it looks as insane:
for (int i = 0; i
{
Console.WriteLine(i.ToString());
}
Please don't flame me on code mistakes, I'm not being paid to code right now and 3/4 through a beautiful Coors 9/16Oz pack.
When the ASP.Net Bible came out with only C# code for .Net 3.5, I realized that I needed to take a second look.
I can promise you this, If you take the plunge on C# and even come close to mastering the art of enterprise C# / .Net Development, you will never want for work.
C# kenobi your are my only hope. To all of the VB.Net developers out there who disagree, I say, "i++"
"The only thing worse then existing, Is not existing"
A funny story:
It was 1988, my mentor from Brookhaven National Laboratory was pestering me over using QuickBasic 4.5 versus Borland Turbo C. He wrote two programs that compared the efficiency of each language and showed me the results. The C guys would tell you the results. Well when I looked at the code:
Keep in mind I'm using C# so it isn't C but to a VB programmer it looks as insane:
for (int i = 0; i
{
Console.WriteLine(i.ToString());
}
Please don't flame me on code mistakes, I'm not being paid to code right now and 3/4 through a beautiful Coors 9/16Oz pack.
When the ASP.Net Bible came out with only C# code for
I can promise you this, If you take the plunge on C# and even come close to mastering the art of enterprise C# /
C# kenobi your are my only hope. To all of the VB.Net developers out there who disagree, I say, "i++"
"The only thing worse then existing, Is not existing"