The distros where fooled into thinking KDE4.0 was ready for production... pleeese. I guess they don't do much test then, because it was obvious to anyone that had actually tried to use it that it wasn't ready. To think this gets modded insightful makes my head hurts... it is literally unbelievable. For those unable to grasp how ridicule that sounds, I'll suggest them to simply refer to the sources instead of constantly trying to reinvent history. I've followed PlanetKDE (http://planetkde.org) and The Dot (http://dot.kde.org/) since I discovered them years ago. It was never suggested that KDE4.0 was meant to be massively dropped on users. Unfortunate the Planet's concept of "old" articles extends no further than last week, otherwise I'd just point you to the time where that DIDN'T happen. You'll have to digg the individual blogs yourself to verify it with your own eyes (here's one blog to get you started though: http://aseigo.blogspot.com/, you can see all posts down to 2004). That's plainly a lie, probably based on a greatly exaggerated 4.0 release note that didn't warned all those coming to www.kde.org hell was about to break loose... But hey, I'm sure that omission caused those 5 people compiling KDE4.0 from sources (everybody else got it from their distro) to be caught off guard... It's easy to say in retrospective that labeling a developers and EARLY ENTHUSIASTS release '4.0' was a mistake. I used to agree with that, then read about the why it was needed (like the need to provide a stable (and believable, as in "the project is committed to it") platform to signal third parties to start porting applications). Bottom line, if your not going to make an effort to grasp the situation and provide us with an informed opinion, maybe you should simple refrain from providing one altogether. BTW, simply pointing out bugs in KMail does not add any weight to your argument either (no matter how severe they are) unless you provide some proof of this deceit scheme you speak of. It does not follow from the mere existence of bugs a conscious decision to lie about the state of the software. Have you actually read about the state of KMail or the any of the other PIM apps anywhere? I guess not, otherwise you'd known they are in the process of being ported to Akonadi and hence not deemed stable by their developers.

I take it you haven't given a chance to the latest KDevelop4 releases. It used to be that, while it showed some promise, it was too unstable (and unfeatured, if that's a word) to work with. The situation has changed in the last weeks though. I gave it another try and was completely surprised to see how well it worked. Stable and a way smarter than the KDE3 version ever hoped to be. It has definitely regained it place as my default IDE for developing C++ code (which it had temporarily lost to QtCreator).

So Chavez is now a military dictator... not to defend the GP nor Chavez, but guess who DOESN'T know what he's talking about now...

The problem is not only the vague language, but also that said promise only applies to what's covered by the ECMA-standard.

English uses a simple form of Latin. Other languages using the Latin alphabet, such as Spanish, French or Portuguese, German, etc. contain symbols not available in the English version. It is generally not a problem though, as most used symbols are available and missing ones can generally be replaced by similar ones.

Believe it or not, it is possible to register multiple domain names and make them point to the same site. I mean, who would have thought of that, right? I've even heard it's possible to have more than one site to your name. Maybe this other little know fact could be used to have 2 sites, perhaps a local one and an international one (but who am I to tell what people will come up with when they found out all this?). But, yeah, other than that, I totally agree with you. Non-latin ccTLDs can't possibly be used for anything else than fulfilling people's "misplaced patriotism". It's not like everybody in the world can't understand the latin alphabet already. That's only to be expected, after all, we would too fell right at home if asked to type giberish in other alphabets as well. I for one would certainly have no trouble typing anything you throw at me, irregardless of alphabet. Chinese, Arabic, Cyrillic, Japanese, you name it, I've mastered them all. What's more, thanks to my great observation skills, I can guess the general meaning of it simply by staring at said giberish for a minute or so. Anyways, I hope to have contributed to your in-deep analysis of the situation.

and it just bugs me the total disconnect of people totally unable to fill in the pretty obvious gaps. nonetheless, here's a "hint": lobbies, powerful corporate lobbies.
yes, to many (including me) the solution to many problems involves government action or regulation. you conveniently ignore that people taking that stance are generally (implicitly or explicitly) talking about legislating in favor of the interests of the general population, not of private interests (the only ones this law is trying to protect).

And if you (re)read the article you'll (hopefully) see systems with SP2 or SP3 are vulnerable too...

"By default, Windows XP SP2, Windows XP SP3 and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition SP2 do not have a listening service configured in the client firewall and are therefore not affected by this vulnerability"

Don't let PR spin on things fool you either.