Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Photon model broken (Score 1) 328

I But what if it is also moving and/or turning/rotating on/along one or more axis. How would we perceive that?

Perhaps as a cosmic centrifugal force that causes galaxies to fly apart from each other, interpreted as a cosmological constant causing the expansion of space itself? Oh, wait...

The Military

United States Begins Flying Stealth Bombers Over South Korea 567

Posted by samzenpus
from the nice-day-for-a-flight dept.
skade88 writes "The New York Times is reporting that the United States has started flying B-2 stealth bomber runs over South Korea as a show of force to North Korea. The bombers flew 6,500 miles to bomb a South Korean island with mock explosives. Earlier this month the U.S. Military ran mock B-52 bombing runs over the same South Korean island. The U.S. military says it shows that it can execute precision bombing runs at will with little notice needed. The U.S. also reaffirmed their commitment to protecting its allies in the region. The North Koreans have been making threats to turn South Korea into a sea of fire. North Korea has also made threats claiming they will nuke the United States' mainland."

Comment: What the hell does this mean? (Score 1) 608

by volpe (#41235431) Attached to: Obama and Romney Respond To ScienceDebate.org Questionnaire

Romney's response to Question 11:

For example, his “Utility MACT” rule is purportedly aimed at reducing mercury pollution, yet the EPA estimates that the rule will cost $10 billion to reduce mercury pollution by only $6 million (with an “m”).

I understand the cost of a reduction being $10 billion. What does it mean to say that the extent of a reduction in mercury pollution is measured in dollars?

Comment: Re:Savvy study author ... (Score 5, Informative) 471

by volpe (#40382653) Attached to: Belief In Hell Predicts a Country's Crime Rates Better Than Other Factors

No, 0.0999[...] (I can't do the symbol here, because /. doesn't do Unicode) is not the same as 0.1 It's never 0.1. The more decimals you add, the closer you get, but like the speed of light, it can never be reached.

Wrong. 0.09999... == 0.1 for the same reasons 0.999999... == 1:

Let:
          X = 0.09999...
Then:
    10X = 0.9999...

(10X - X) = 0.999999... - 0.0999999...
(All 9's in hundredths place and beyond cancel out)

9X = 0.90000000...
X = .1
QED

Comment: Re:Don't bet on it. (Score 1) 1226

by volpe (#40146113) Attached to: Debate Over Evolution Will Soon Be History, Says Leakey

Tell your friend that she's a racist.

Why? Because every birther is a racist.

I know that's a strong statement, but I can prove it. Every birther believes that Barack Obama is not the legitimately elected president of the United States because there is some question as to whether or not he was born in the United States. (Actually, there's provably no question any more, but the racist birthers like to pretend that there is.) But I'd bet anything that ever birther, every last one of them, voted for John McCain in the last election. And unlike Barack Obama, there has never been any question as to whether or not John McCain was born in the United States. John McCain was absolutely, positively, undeniably, without a doubt NOT born in the United States. John McCain was born on a U.S. naval base in the panama canal region. It was not incorporated U.S. territory at the time of his birth, and babies were not, at that time, automatically given birthright citizenship merely by virtue of having been born there. However, at the moment of his birth, John McCain was a natural born citizen of the U.S. because at least one of his parents was a citizen. This is precisely the same reason why Barack Obama would still be a natural born citizen even if he were not born in Hawaii, which he was. So, apparently, to the birthers, this standard of citizenship, while good enough for John McCain, is not good enough for Barack Obama, even though Obama's claim to natural-born citizenship is stronger than McCain's. And the only possible explanation for this level of hypocricy is racism.

Comment: Useless (Score 1) 210

by volpe (#38611132) Attached to: Apple Patents Power Adapter That Recovers Lost Passwords

The new technique is only secure, the patent admits, in cases where the user leaves a mobile device's charger at home.

And even then, it's only secure if nobody breaks into your home. And you'll need a separate power adapter for use outside home. Under these conditions, you can ditch the home power adapter and replace it with a piece of paper with the password written on it.

Q: What do you call a principal female opera singer whose high C is lower than those of other principal female opera singers? A: A deep C diva.

Working...