This means that if something bad is happening at the Fukushima plant, then we have to rely on someone doing the moral thing and telling the world and then going to jail.
The bill still has to go through the Upper House but it's likely to pass without much opposition even though the media and the public have been strongly opposed to it. It seems very likely that the bill is there to cover up any bad information that might tarnish Japan or TEPCO's image.
Japan state secrets bill on track to become law despite protests
I feel this video series explains the problem very well and shows potential solutions.
The Problems with First past the Post Voting
There's often talk about whether there is a lot of Helium-3 under the surface of the moon since the astronauts brought back rocks containing lots of it. Shouldn't this helium show up in a spectrum analysis of the dirt plume from the crash?
So even though the fault clearly lies with the moderators, they're trying to blame the person at the top, the founder.
If you demand censure of someone's speech, you allow him a loophole to demand the censure of yours.
Then I wish someone would explain to me how WBC can picket almost anywhere with relative ease, but something like "Occupy Wall Street" gets relegated to "free speech zones" out of the way of all eyes and ears.
If that's not censure, then I don't know what is.
I don't know how posted this, but I read it on here and found it to be a very good idea.