Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Nice conspiracy theory, but... (Score 1) 514

by vague disclaimer (#35916488) Attached to: The Real Reason Apple Is Suing Samsung
You seriously believe a company like Apple cannot ramp up production if there is demand?

Learn the concept of marginal returns. I am quite certain Apple could buy up more production capacity. I am equally certain it could not do so in an economically viable way. Not all demand is profitable. The other makers are equally constrained, which is why none of them can produce a viable tablet to compete on price with iPad.

Comment: Re:Peer review is broken (Score 1) 962

by vague disclaimer (#35412442) Attached to: The Encroachment of Fact-Free Science
But then they "prove" that it doesn't.

No, they showed that it is less effective at primary prevention the previously supposed, (but still very effective at secondary prevention).

The trick is to develop the hypothesis properly. Also, there is a lot more to "proving" than a null hypothesis - that is just a useful logical device, especially when using statisitcal significance as a metric (as well as helping to check that the hypothesis is amenable to falsification).

And the statins I take are generic and long out of patent, so "big pharma" is way past caring about them.

Real science is hard and takes time. What is taught in a few paragraphs today took Newton a lifetime to perceive.

Comment: Re:Generic Trademarks (Score 2) 356

by vague disclaimer (#35356432) Attached to: If App Store's Trademark Is Generic, So Is Windows'
However, when you say the word "App Store", I think that conjures up images of just about any sort of app stores that we have nowadays - Palm's, Blackberry's, Windows Phone's Android's, etc

That is rather Apple's point: the others are living off the goodwill created by Apple's innovation ("passing off", in the parlance). ie, Apple's argument is that it has become generic because others lifted it. And I believe US trademark law operates on a "use it or lose it" principle that requires trademarks to be defended actively.

Also, I would bet a reasonable amount of cash that if you did a survey of non-geek smartphone users, most would think "iPhone" to the prompt "App store".

The price one pays for pursuing any profession, or calling, is an intimate knowledge of its ugly side. -- James Baldwin