Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Could HAARP's next target be the New Madrid fault?-> 1

Submitted by
uswgo
uswgo writes "Could HAARP decide to target the Madrid fault line to trigger an earthquake for FEMA to conduct a martial law declaration in the United States of America? If so what kinds of proof would you have? It’s all explained in this article.

According to a quote below, the New Madrid fault line is a new and active fault line that travels in some of our states. Two websites which includes, TenderLance a BeforeItsNews reporter created article, and a facebook note created by Joseph Roberts suggests that HAARP has been reactivated and will strike at the New Madrid fault line.

So why not we look at three major catastrophes that are supposedly natural disasters but I suspect otherwise that it is either HAARP, EISCAT. or another HAARP/EISCAT clone that has been built and militarized in other countries. The way I will show you proof that the three major catastrophes are probably created through weather modification is with Magnetometer data and with that data if the magnetism levels are very high then it shows that something was messing with the Earths Magnetism while bouncing sounds off the Ionosphere. That means that somebody used weather modification technology to create these earthquakes, storms, tsunamis, earthquakes, and even trigger volcanic eruptions. The three disaster examples I will cite in this article are Hurricane Katrina at around August 2005, Haiti Earthquake at around , and the Japan Earthquake at around March 11 2011.

Now according to the Data I have gathered from research and creating my own data table based on the work done by WikiWorldOrder I was able to create the HAARP data table image (Very large image! So small monitors and graphic cards with little-memory are not recommended) for Hurricane Katrina and post the HAARP data table image from WikiWorldOrder that shows that the Magnetometer levels spiked during the Japan Earthquake disaster."

Link to Original Source

+ - Righthaven wanted victim to sign a life gag order->

Submitted by
uswgo
uswgo writes "New charges were leveled at Righthaven LLC in a recent Reply filed by attorney David Kerr of the Santangelo Law Offices, who represents defendant Brian D. Hill. The Reply is brimming with details, particularly concerning the Release and Settlement Agreement crafted by Righthaven. (A related Vegas Inc article contains the full text of the proposed press release as does the last page of the agreement.) I've pulled a section from the Reply where Kerr summarizes the terms of the agreement:

Conditions of Release (Page 21 of Reply)

        Righthaven inappropriately sought to enjoin Mr. Hill from exploiting any and all Righthaven intellectual property, apart from the subject image, without identifying or specifying such works. Such overbroad demand being subject to an award of liquidated damages of $10,000 per breach.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to bind non-parties to the terms of the settlement, namely Roberta Hill, and Mr. Hill’s counsel.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to use the settlement agreement to remove content from non-party websites that are known to be critical of its for-profit litigation model.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to use the settlement agreement to obtain potentially privileged and confidential information from Mr. Hill’s counsel.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition the release of claims against Mr. Hill only on completion of certain actions by counsel and other non-parties
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition the release of claims against Mr. Hill based on relinquishing his first amendment rights.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition the release of claims against Mr. Hill to stifle public criticism.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought a permanent gag order against Mr. Hill, his mother and his attorneys, not only as to the terms of the settlement, but as to ever publically discussing any aspect of this case, or Righthaven generally. Such onerous demand being subject to an award of liquidated damages of $10,000 per breach.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition settlement on requirements that counsel for Righthaven remove, or seek to have removed any public comments made about this case or Righthaven, and that counsel for Mr. Hill would be further enjoined from ever publically discussing Righthaven, or this case, except with explicit permission of Righthaven, prejudicing his ability to represent other Defendants accused by Righthaven.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to impose onerous liquidated damages of $10,000 per breach of the settlement agreement. Such damages were applicable to Mr. Hill’s mother, and could be construed to apply to Mr. Hill’s counsel.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to fix jurisdiction and venue for any breach of this agreement in Nevada despite being aware that Mr. Hill’s medical and financial condition would make it impossible to defend his rights in that jurisdiction.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to require attorneys’ fee pursuant to any breach of the settlement agreement, even though they were aware that Mr. Hill had no recoverable assets, and that his only source of income was exempted from such relief under federal law.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to issue a press release that fabricated specific quotes falsely representing that Mr. Hill, his mother and attorney’s had made false statements directly contrary to the facts and prior declarations made to this court. The ultimate result being that, Righthaven sought to leverage and condition Mr. Hill’s release with a false admission that he, and his mother, and potentially his counsel had perjured themselves before this Court.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to issue a press release solely to embarrass and disparage Mr. Hill, insinuating that his mental condition may have led him to make false statements to the public and the Court.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to issue a press release which falsely represented that Mr. Hill’s counsel endorsed Righthaven’s business practices and that Righthaven had exhibited professional behavior during settlement negotiations.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to have Mr. Hill provide a false apology for his actions which he maintains are fair use under the law.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to extract a false apology from Roberta Hill’s for critical statements regarding Righthaven.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to extract a false concession from Mr. Hill’s counsel for critical statements made regarding Righthaven’s business model.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to fabricate quotes from Mr. Hill’s counsel that would contradict the facts of Righthavens litigation conduct in an effort to mitigate or cut-off any accrued liability.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to fabricate quotes from Mr. Hill’s counsel that would falsely admit, and make legal conclusions that Righthaven was within their rights to pursue claims of copyright infringement against Mr. Hill, and that Mr. Hill’s actions violated the law. Such false concessions would result in extreme prejudice to Mr. Hill’s legal rights and any later appeal efforts, but would be in total derogation of counsel’s ethical and professional obligations to his client."

Link to Original Source

+ - Update to the story "Colorado Judge Puts All Right->

Submitted by
uswgo
uswgo writes "New charges were leveled at Righthaven LLC in a recent Reply filed by attorney David Kerr of the Santangelo Law Offices, who represents defendant Brian D. Hill. The Reply is brimming with details, particularly concerning the Release and Settlement Agreement crafted by Righthaven. (A related Vegas Inc article contains the full text of the proposed press release as does the last page of the agreement.) I've pulled a section from the Reply where Kerr summarizes the terms of the agreement:

Conditions of Release (Page 21 of Reply)

        Righthaven inappropriately sought to enjoin Mr. Hill from exploiting any and all Righthaven intellectual property, apart from the subject image, without identifying or specifying such works. Such overbroad demand being subject to an award of liquidated damages of $10,000 per breach.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to bind non-parties to the terms of the settlement, namely Roberta Hill, and Mr. Hill’s counsel.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to use the settlement agreement to remove content from non-party websites that are known to be critical of its for-profit litigation model.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to use the settlement agreement to obtain potentially privileged and confidential information from Mr. Hill’s counsel.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition the release of claims against Mr. Hill only on completion of certain actions by counsel and other non-parties
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition the release of claims against Mr. Hill based on relinquishing his first amendment rights.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition the release of claims against Mr. Hill to stifle public criticism.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought a permanent gag order against Mr. Hill, his mother and his attorneys, not only as to the terms of the settlement, but as to ever publically discussing any aspect of this case, or Righthaven generally. Such onerous demand being subject to an award of liquidated damages of $10,000 per breach.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to condition settlement on requirements that counsel for Righthaven remove, or seek to have removed any public comments made about this case or Righthaven, and that counsel for Mr. Hill would be further enjoined from ever publically discussing Righthaven, or this case, except with explicit permission of Righthaven, prejudicing his ability to represent other Defendants accused by Righthaven.
        Righthaven inappropriately sought to impose onerous liquidated damages of $10,000 per breach of the settlement agreement. Such damages were applicable to Mr. Hill’s mother, and could be construed to apply to Mr. Hill’s counsel.

Goto link to find out more."

Link to Original Source

+ - Copyright jackal Righthaven sues young blogger->

Submitted by uswgo
uswgo (1694140) writes "Being a citizen journalist is getting really scary, with copyright trolls lurking in the dark.

One of the worst is the wrongly named Righthaven, run by online jackal Steve Gibson.

“I’ve been a political journalist and blogger for over a year”, says Brian Hill (right) from Mayodan, North Carolina, in an email.

Brian 20, is one of Gibson’s latest victims.

He runs USWGO Alternative News. a non-profit site “where I write my own articles and mirror others articles with links to the source (Sometimes include pictures) to educate people that certain political agendas are going on but that got me sued this time”, he says.

He carried a Denver Post picture of a Transportation Security Administration guy groping — and we do mean groping — a passenger."

Link to Original Source
Databases

Journal: FamLink National database will hold personal information on Parents

Journal by uswgo

Right now a American reporter from California is doing an personal investigation on the Child Protective Services new database, FamLink. FamLink checks will also be required according to the Children's Administration of the Washington Department of Social and Health Services. Evidence and reliable testimonies is being brought up to expose this National database that is being implemented from state to state. This database is suppose to hold private information from anybody who even messes with

Databases

+ - A new threat is heading for American families-> 5

Submitted by uswgo
uswgo (1694140) writes "A new threat has been emerged to American families and even parents according to a testimony by Patience Summers on Dr Shirley Moore’s show, Justice4Us. The 2 hour episode titled Stop the Foreclosure’s Now that aired on October 29 2010, had a woman by the name of Patience Summers that was calling in at around 50:00 into the show, was told by Dr. Shirley Moore to talk about the new National Child Protective Services (CPS) database system which is going to further allow CPS into not just all sorts of private information on each family that gets in any kind of commotion with CPS but also a system that is vulnerable to easy hacking. Also according to more research through documents notes and info added from papers into Famlink is suppose to be destroyed after the information is properly added which means CPS can easily lie about parents and there will be no real evidence to back up claims by CPS. This can mean that under digital decree CPS can have more extensive abilities and digital records they manage to find any excuse they can deem to snatch children away from healthy and good family, and even families with political views that the U.S. Government deems as “Dangerous”.

Also with how corrupt CPS has been getting it is very easy for the Federal Government to forge documents and records in order to criminalize dissidents and take their children away. One of these examples of John Irish and his wife losing their child over simply belonging to a Oath Keepers discussion board. Although the Irish family managed to get their baby back after the court admitted defeat they aren’t the only family to be persecuted by CPS.

Now What is famlink? Well through searching through many bits and pieces the U.S. Government forgot to cover-up (Save the documents while you can!) I was able to start putting together the pieces of what FamLink is."

Link to Original Source
Privacy

+ - Google Demands Phone Number for All Registrations-> 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "We have now discovered after receiving complaints and reports from both the silenced YouTube activist and other sources that YouTube now requires all future Google and YouTube registrant users to verify their accounts via SMS or Voice Call....This is one step closer to a police state internet where just to get on the internet you'll be required to give out your drivers license identification maybe even your license plate number...

This also means that if you get your account suspended by YouTube or post a lot of controversial political videos you would either have to own a lot of phone numbers, cell phones, or have to resort to identity theft just to get back on YouTube. This is alarming now that YouTube is forcing all future users to tie their cell phone numbers or regular traceable phone numbers to their online accounts.

If you don't want to live in a police state I suggest boycott Google after calling them and telling them that until they stop the SMS verification or make it optional that you won't ever use a Google product or else one day Google may require a Social Security Number just to use an account...."

Link to Original Source

10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.

Working...