Oh wait. What I was trying to say its not related at all with this guy's theories. I was trying to say that something hit Venus and set it into the retrograde rotation during the same period Mars and Earth were hit by other bodies.
I don't really know who Velikovsky is and sorry about the wrong term. The thing is that a lot of chaotic stuff happened during the same period of the solar system formation.
Makes a lot of sense. But its not just a technological limitation. If you think about how stars and planetary systems are formed within the nebula it is unlikely that large planets like Neptune and Uranus can born so far from the host stars.
I remember reading somewhere that massive as they are they could not had been formed so far from the sun. But when they moved to the distant reaches of the solar system they did a real fucking mess that caused massive collisions that hit Venus, Mars and the Earth. In the Earth case it was the event that created the moon but Mars and Venus were smaller and didn't had the same luck. This could be the reason of Venus' retrograde orbit and the impact that created Mars' Valis Marinelis. Such an event could also have destroyed the convection mechanism of the nucleus that creates the magnetic field and extinguished the water on those planets to evaporate.
The fact that such planets are normally found near extrasolar stars is interesting. It kinda tells us that the solar system as we know has been shaped by their migration. IANAA and I don't have a source for that so feel free to correct me. Its just amazing how everything related to the solar system formation is connected to those 2 big god damn fuckers.
They cost around 10000 USD in Brazil.
Those discussions are dumb and they seem to ignore the will of the people who live there. They do not want to be argentinians and they also are not that much fans of british interventions. That place is paradise for people who wants to live a simple life.
It sounds even more dumb if you consider the fact that Argentina can't even hold their shit together. They should fix their stuff before bragging about rights to that place.
I could be wrong but booting with network without X11 on Ubuntu requires Grub command line arguments. What the hell man.
And thats a damn phone OS. I'm quite scared of how Mavericks will turn out. Or the OS X team is still competent as they used to be?
I think its fair to mention that the Vita has an unused port on its top right side. AFAIK it is "reserved" for future features. I would not be surprised if thats HDMI capable.
SuSE Linux Enterprise because it pays the bills.
For personal usage I prefer FreeBSD.
How? People are already replacing the devil with Apple in the "The
My first contact was while working for an online gaming community that served some korean MMOs who ran on top of FreeBSD. Their firewall was handled by OpenBSD. I might say that pf is incredible from the point of view of someone who has to deal with iptables and iproute2 from time to time.
Today I use it as my home server providing ZFS storage management AFP through netatalk and CIFS, Kerberos, DNS and LDAP through SAMBA4. I'm very proud of my FreeBSD box.
YaST works for most of the stuff you would want to do in a desktop operating system. The SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED for short) distribution is the best example I have of a decent no-nonsense Linux desktop.
It works well even for basic server configurations of Postfix, Apache and Bind and it detects (and respects) when you have manually modified config files.
The only instance I had to edit config files on SLED was when I had to configure SSSD to authenticate on kerberos and lookup for user and group information on LDAP.
What about subdirectories? You need executable permission to acess the contents of a subfolder on his home directory.