Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Suuuure they are. (Score 1) 429

by uhlume (#27299793) Attached to: Universal Remote's Days Are Numbered

Until my PDA/smartphone sports an IR emitter, or all of my entertainment equipment (including legacy items I have no need or desire to replace) supports Bluetooth natively or can be cheaply retrofitted, my Harmony 880 is quite safe, thanks. Even then, I'd have a hard time giving up dedicated, touch-distinguishable hard buttons for functions like play/pause and volume control.

Comment: Re:So.. (Score 1) 509

by uhlume (#27024561) Attached to: Microsoft Brings 36 New Features To Windows 7

And yet I don't hear anybody complaining loudly they had to buy a Blu-ray player and an HDTV with HDMI to play Blu-ray discs. Same draconian DRM, same barriers; artificial and otherwise. The difference seems to be that you'd be hard-pressed to find a modern HDTV that doesn't have HDMI inputs — but the same should be true of HDCP-compatible monitors by the time Windows 7 hits shelves, if it isn't already. (When I bought my newest monitor a couple of months ago, most of the models I looked at were HDCP-compatible, and many had HDMI-in.)

Disappointed that you're locked out of using your existing physically-capable equipment? Do you also complain that you can't attach a Blu-ray player to the S-Video port on your old big-screen TV?

Comment: Google already has the numbers... (Score 1) 383

by uhlume (#26965783) Attached to: Is Flash Really On 99% of Net Devices?

...Thanks to Google Analytics. One of the many pieces of useful information GA tracks by default is site visitors' Flash capabilities (down to the minor version number). If you don't think Google is already tracking those numbers in aggregate form across all the sites they service with GA, you probably don't quite grasp the business Google is in.

Anecdotally, Adobe's 99% claim is broadly supported by the Google Analytics stats on the mid-sized corporate web site I maintain: of ~35,000 unique visitors this month, a little under 97% reported some version of Flash installed (and of that number, a total of 11 reported an open source Flash player).

Comment: Re:If you can't fail, why bother playing? (Score 1) 507

by uhlume (#26266425) Attached to: Avoiding Wasted Time With <em>Prince of Persia</em>

I'm sure I could find a kinder way to phrase this if I cared to try, but don't be fucking retarded.

Saving my game right before I plunge into a room full of enemies with limited cover and even more limited ammo doesn't prevent me from dying once, twice, a hundred times before I develop a winning strategy. It doesn't mean that I win just for showing up. It does mean I get to focus my effort on overcoming the challenge at hand, rather than being forced to replay some arbitrary chunk of the game over and over again just to get to the bit that overwhelmed me. (Why should the penalty for failure be endless tedium? That sounds too much like real life to qualify as entertainment.)

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.