the top 1% get 99% of the money.
basketball ex:
if you are the one-and-only LeBron,
get you some. if you are the starting
forward for Fordham...good luck with that.
is scrutiny from A better and/or more reliable than from B?
will multiple scrutinizers provide better data just because they're *more*?
my position is: inviting more to the party invites more of absolutely everything.