Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:The truth, for those who don't want to admit it (Score 2, Interesting) 912

by trufflemage (#11774962) Attached to: ALA President Not Fond of Bloggers
Your point is valid with respect to at least one participant: me. Posting online yields instant rewards. I think there may be a real danger here. I confess that in my short time on Slashdot, I've been tremendously aware of mod points (maybe even more concerned with mod points than the responses to my posts?) Yes, online I get attention. In RL I'm not published (though I've tried to become so) and online, I'm a writer with an audience. Admittedly a small audience, but an audience, and the danger lies in the ease of posting and the rewards I get (if I admit, and I do, that I write for attention) for posting. Folks respond, my ego becomes involved, and as often as not an argument ensues.

From the article:

I doubt that many of the Blog People are in the habit of sustained reading of complex texts. It is entirely possible that their intellectual needs are met by an accumulation of random facts and paragraphs. In that case, their rejection of my view is quite understandable.


While I don't share Michael Gorman's dismissal of Blog People's abilities (his "intellectual needs" comment is galling), I do think he's rubbed his fingers over a kernel of truth. The fact is, that blogging and online reading (ie, surfing the web) have largely edged out something else in my life: reading books. Not that I've given up the practice, but that I'm less inclined to do it than I used to be, and more inclined to lose large periods of time in front of the computer screen. (I do not say the medium is to blame; I want to avoid digital vs. paper catfights.) I suspect my behavior is related to a feedback loop of work/reward. Posting online requires relatively little work and yields relatively immediate reward. Reading online, similarly, is quick & easy compared to novels. I flatter myself that I monitor the cutting edge of news via the web--and I believe it is possible to do so, and Slashdot may even be an aid towards doing so--but in fact, I derive as much satisfaction out of a rousing debate on inane trivia (provided I win, or score points or prestige) as I do out of debating issues of real significance. The gratification of the moment doesn't care what the subject is, only that I'm reading/writing/evaluating...and getting attention.

Yes, you've struck a nerve, O Anonymous Coward.

There's a larger point too, having to do with attention span, that is implicitly raised in M. Gorman's comment. It may be that as I feed myself with digital snacks I to some degree lose interest in meatier works. It's easy to show off a little knowledge of calculus, should a discussion head that direction, and easy enough to look up on Google the innards of whatever physics question is the problem of the moment, since those are quick and work-free; it's much harder to sustain a quiet and real course of study on some difficult topic. A steady diet of snacks may gradually wear down my ability to sustain long-term learning and interacting.

I may have to curtail my participation herewith. :)

If you had better tools, you could more effectively demonstrate your total incompetence.

Working...