+ - Why Silicon Valley will hate California's 'right to know' bill->
Link to Original Source
|
|
As Apple said in its opening to the jury - something like "Samsung doesn't deserve to have its patent claims heard because it didn't sue us before we sued them." So who was the aggressor, the instigator? In Apples own words it was Apple. There are real patents to be weighed here, both Samsung and Apple have valid claims. But Apple can't claim the rectangle shape with rounded corners. I have a Compaq IPAQ sitting here in front of me, predating Apple by years. And an Apple Newton. There is no way I, as a designer, would ever have considered in 2007 that Apple would dare to patent such a shape. Innovation is being stifled here. I have the Newton, but I will never buy another Apple product. Does that make me biased. Well, that can be argued, as well
No, Kim DotCom is accused of criminal conduct in order to get around laws like this. Don't rely on civil law to protect you from big brother.
I am very happy with my Logitech (at $99) and current GoogleTV software. I get free Amazon-Prime movies (end especially BBC comedies) as well as YouTube videos (recently watched all 3 hours of 'Triumph of the Nerds' with the whole family in the living room)...
I use mGmaps in my Blackberry. Unlike Google Maps, you can download the maps in advance and work in an offline (airplane) mode. A world map at decent resolution takes about 6 gigs of SD card space. But this will just make sure you know where you are - I use TomTom to get me where I want to go. Two different tasks
More are taken in by hope than by cunning. -- Vauvenargues