Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: and the benefits are? (Score 4, Interesting) 128

by travellerjohn (#39888175) Attached to: British Broadband Needs £1bn More Funding
Superfast broadband is great, but are there really economic and social benefits?

Fast broadband makes a difference to entertainment but hardly necessary for employment, communication or accessing public services. Unless the government has plan to put high end tech jobs out in the depths of the Scottish highlands I would have thought that 4 MBps would do just fine. I struggle to see why I should subsidise some farmers access to NetFlix.

Who commissioned this report again? Any danger of the LSE coming to the conclusions the client wanted?

Comment: More concerned by the TV companies than hackers (Score 5, Insightful) 211

by travellerjohn (#39721079) Attached to: Spoiler Alert: Your TV Will Be Hacked
An internet enabled TV is going to be irresistible to TV companies. Perfectly legally they will get together with the manufacturers to personalise you TV experience. Given half a chance they will monitor your viewing, suggest programs, personalise adverts, maybe even personalise the news. Not so bad you might think: I never have to see Sarah Palin on the TV again. More likely, if they think you are an independent voter in a swing state, it is back to back political adverts for you for the next six months. Don't be surprised if your remote dont seem to work half way through a PAC spot. Remember If You're Not Paying for It; You're the Product

Comment: How portable exactly? (Score 4, Interesting) 236

by travellerjohn (#27639607) Attached to: Rugged Linux Server For Rural, Tropical Environment?
I managed the IT for a couple of organisations in Cambodia and then Lao for a couple of years. Environments not so different from Bangladesh I suspect.

My experience was that it was best to buy standard mid range kit (IBM, or Dell Poweredge servers in tower cases worked just fine) and then invest in some physical infrastructure and climate control. It was generally straightforward enough to find a secure corner of an office and put install a small self contained rack with a UPS or two. Or even better get someone to wall up a corner of an office and put in an aircon. That kind of skill was in plentyful supply.

Lugging around some serious kit in that kind of environment would give me sleepless nights. The chance of it getting dropped, rained on or stolen is just too high. (We had a couple of laptops stolen while I was there, and you aint going to be happy chap if you come back to your hotel one night and find your server has gone walkies.) I advise you try and travel with what you need, preferrably a run of the mill inconspicuous laptop and find a secure base or two for your servers.
Businesses

+ - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/29/whats_goin

Submitted by travellerjohn
travellerjohn (772758) writes "There is plenty of speculation in the press about what will happen to Sun. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/29/whats_going_to_happen_to_sun/. Personally I have always liked the idea of a Sun Apple merger. Solaris and ZFS underpinning OSX would be a cracking desktop OS, and all that Sun enterprise software and kit driving business inside the corporation would make for a true competitor for Microsoft at last. They might have to do a bit more work on Star Office and Opera mind you. So how would the /. crowd like to see Sun evolve?"
Java

+ - No Java 1.6 on Leopard->

Submitted by travellerjohn
travellerjohn (772758) writes "Over on The Register they have a report that Java 1.6 is not supported on Leopard. Sure we are used to Apple being a bit slow getting a Java VM out, but this strikes me as a major ommission in the new OS. With Apple's small market share support for a cross platform language like Java should be a strategic priority not an afterthought. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/29/no_java_for_leopard/"
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Endangers Mutually Supporting Monopolies (Score 1) 300

by travellerjohn (#15953030) Attached to: Stuart Cohen Predicts Office for Linux

You have hit the nail on the head.

I work for a small company where we recently considered moving to Linux on our workstations. The Operating System was not an issue, but the cost of retraining our staff to use OpenOffice out-weighed any benefit we might gain. Taking even half a day to train a busy executive would cost the company more in lost time and productivity than we could ever hope to gain in savings through licencing costs.

Meanwhile at home I have switched to OSX without any drop in productivity (well apart from time wasted playing with all the pretty widgets) because I can use Word with no time spent relearning the system. Someday I will try iWork but I am just too busy right now.

Microsoft may create a version of Office for Linux, but it will be after they have lost the battle for the desktop not before.

Real Programmers don't write in PL/I. PL/I is for programmers who can't decide whether to write in COBOL or FORTRAN.

Working...