Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Won't this eventually defeat the purpose? (Score 1) 138

by totallymeat (#29467029) Attached to: Google Buys reCAPTCHA For Better Book Scanning

But once OCR is improved to the point where it can read poorer scans, won't spammers be able to use that new technology to eventually defeat CAPTCHA?

If you look at CAPTCHAs as a method for improving artificial intelligence, then the issue you're raising gets turned into a benefit of ever-improving Turing tests.

  1. Find a problem that AI cannot readily solve, yet humans can (obfuscated word recognition).
  2. Develop a CAPTCHA out of the problem (reCAPTCHA).
  3. Either the problem remains unsolved and the CAPTCHA must be solved by humans...
  4. ... or we develop stronger AI capable of solving the original problem.

In either outcome, we get something useful, either better Turing tests or more robust AI. The hardest part of this loop is developing novel CAPTCHAs, but at least the cycle results in useful outcomes every time.

All great ideas are controversial, or have been at one time.

Working...