SLS, then Slackware, then Redhat, then Fedora, now CentOS. But I've always had other boxes around like FreeBSD and Gentoo.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
If you use your PC for both work and non-work activities, or anything else like that, one way to keep yourself from distracting yourself is to maintain separate logins.
For example, I have a desktop PC in my home office that I use for both work and for pleasure/gaming/etc. It's usually running Windows 7. I maintain two independent desktop logins - one for work, one for non-work. In this way when I'm on the clock for work, my whole environment says it's work time. That cool web site I was reading last night? The bookmark for it is on the other desktop; I can't see it from here. When I finish work at 5pm or whatever, I switch desktops, and now all my work-related stuff is invisible again. Likewise I have separate mailboxes and domain names, separate logins on my Linux box,
Take care of yourself and your family, and good luck in the future with whatever you do.
It can be convenient to prioritize UDP over other traffic for simple QoS at a shared broadband gateway. It catches DNS queries, VoIP, gamers, and most anything else small and sensitive.
In an attempt to avoid ISP filters the P2P users sprawl across all 64k TCP ports. Now the UDP portspace will be covered in P2P crap too. There are lots of major IP protocol numbers left... at least in my copy of
But then again, I think we all know the real motivation for this effort is simply to make it more difficult to segregate P2P at the ISP. I don't really care about that; my problem is the collateral damage.