Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Courts

tomhudson's Journal: Online petition to jail Polansky and boycott his supporters 32

Journal by tomhudson

A few days ago, a bunch of non-too-bright film industry types signed a petition to free Roman Polansky
Fortunately, the Internet routes around damage. Petition to jail Polansky (remember, he's already been convicted, plus fleeing is an automatic 5 year additional sentence) and boycott his supporters. Exerpt of grand jury testimony, if you've been living in a cave.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Online petition to jail Polansky and boycott his supporters

Comments Filter:
  • Congratulations; you've jumped on the neocon bandwagon. In fact you've lit the torches and are inviting people to march towards the village. First invite the Christians, because they know all about bandwagons, then invite the conservatives, then implore the Liberals not to be communists and to join the fight against evil... It's not about the law, he's served his time (although not the full 50 years for the "drugging" and "rape"), it's about morality. But hey, I guess I'm just one of those loser apologists

    • by tomhudson (43916)

      The facts:

      1. He didn't "serve his time" in any shape, manner, or form. He fled before the sentencing hearing.
      2. If you read the transcripts, he admitted that he:
        1. knew she was 13
        2. betrayed the family's trust
        3. gave her booze and drugs
        4. had vaginal sex with her
      3. From the grand jury testimony,
        1. he also had oral and anal sex - those other charges dropped in the plea bargain

      I'm glad we can at least agree that the guy SHOULD have to serve his time - but we don't know WHAT that time will be - after the plea barg

      • If you read the transcripts, he admitted that he:

        1. knew she was 13
        2. betrayed the family's trust
        3. gave her booze and drugs
        4. had vaginal sex with her

        I didn't read the "transcripts" (court transcript I assume), but I am aware of the issues.

        As for serving time, he was in custody for a period of time. One can never make accurate assumptions as to why people would flea custody, but since you appear to know about the case you should be aware that there was constant pressure to put him in jail for the rest of his life for what people gleefully describe as "child rape", as opposed to "engaging in unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor". Of course you know th

        • by Com2Kid (142006)

          HE VAGINALLY AND ANALLY RAPED A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL.

          On the other side of things, that same woman now says that he has already paid his dues and that the issue should be dropped.

          But drugging and raping ANYONE is pretty high on the Shoot In The Head Right Now list.

          • Look at the Winners who Upmodded the Troll and Flamer. Unfortunately this type of attitude is prevalent in society: Hatred and violence always get rewarded. FUCK YOU ALL ASSHOLES. If violence should be done, it should be done by the people who are abused by bullies. There needs to be more Columbines. I'm out of here. PEOPLE on Slashdot are sick fucks. BY assholes. I hope you all die.

            • by tomhudson (43916)

              Look at the Winners who Upmodded the Troll and Flamer. Unfortunately this type of attitude is prevalent in society: Hatred and violence always get rewarded. FUCK YOU ALL ASSHOLES. If violence should be done, it should be done by the people who are abused by bullies. There needs to be more Columbines. I'm out of here. PEOPLE on Slashdot are sick fucks. BY assholes. I hope you all die.

              The problem is that the people who are being abused aren't in a position to attack their abusers - otherwise, the abuser wou

          • HE VAGINALLY AND ANALLY RAPED A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL.

            I'll leave one more comment before I permanently erase my password here. He NEVER " VAGINALLY AND ANALLY RAPED A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL", what he did do is pressure a girl under his employment to have sex with him. There was no kidnapping or violence used, as is implied by the Trolls and Liars who want to physically harm me because I'm trying to bring some Truth and Rationality to an irrational situation. Unfortunately the Truth is always the first victim of a lynch mob.

            You people can have your fun demonizing me

            • by Com2Kid (142006)

              what he did do is pressure a girl under his employment to have sex with him.

              That is called rape.

              She repeatedly asked him to stop, he didn't.

            • sorry to see you plan to abandon the unlametheweak identity.

              vaya con dios

            • by tomhudson (43916)

              I'll leave one more comment before I permanently erase my password here. He NEVER " VAGINALLY AND ANALLY RAPED A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL", what he did do is pressure a girl under his employment to have sex with him. There was no kidnapping or violence used, as is implied by the Trolls and Liars who want to physically harm me because I'm trying to bring some Truth and Rationality to an irrational situation. Unfortunately the Truth is always the first victim of a lynch mob.

              1. He admitted to the vaginal sex, in retur
        • Faulty logic (Score:3, Insightful)

          by tomhudson (43916)

          Too bad people aren't as interested in arresting mass murderers like Augusto Pinoche, but instead spend vast amounts of tax payers money tracking down somebody who pressured a young girl into sex. Clearly mass murder is more repellent than "date rape". Actually, I guess it isn't.

          It's not an either-or choice.

          Also, he didn't "date rape" her. No means no. The sex was non-consensual. He's at least as bad as anyone who slips a woman a date-rape drug. Also, the victim in such cases is usually the last per

    • by RM6f9 (825298)

      To hell with him doing time - any adult (18+) who while in that age range has had sexual relations with a 13-yr-old child should have his genitals blown off with a double-barreled 12-gauge - if he doesn't bleed to death, put the next both-barrels shot through his head - all, all, ALL actual child molesters should be shot completely dead, and my conscience would have no qualms about pulling the trigger, as many times as I have rounds, targets, and a functional firearm.
      It's not about socialism, or christianit

      • Thank you for being a good example of what I am trying to fight against. You people need to speak up more often.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by RM6f9 (825298)

          Yeah - stand up and defend a child-rapist against me, or any other of the growing number of people who realize that there are such things as Right and Wrong, raping children is Wrong regardless of labels, and tolerating it or actively defending those who do it lies dangerously close to perpetrating it.
          Thank you for letting me know exactly where you stand.

          • You spoke about about sexual relations in general, and not just about "rape":

            To hell with him doing time - any adult (18+) who while in that age range has had sexual relations with a 13-yr-old child should have his genitals blown off with a double-barreled 12-gauge

            You are obviously a neocon in your attitudes and beliefs. You are obviuosly attempting to twist what I say into propaganda to support your own immoral views. You say that you want to murder, kill and torture. You claim that sex is bad. Clearly you have problems. You are sicko.

            • by RM6f9 (825298)

              Hey, MORON: "

              "You spoke about about sexual relations in general, and not just about "rape":"

              ANY "sexual relations" between an 18+ yr old and a 13 yr old IS RAPE!!!
              Yes, I claim that RAPE is WRONG - the logical error of over-generalizing what I said into implying that "sex is bad" merely paints you as stupid.

              As far as my being "sicko", you are more than likely correct: Being anally raped by my 40-something father when I was 13 probably had a lot to do with it.

              I have succeeded in talking myself out of killing

              • Hey, MORON: "

                I have had IQ tests to prove that I am not a moron. You are just arguing with Flame warfare and propaganda, because you know that you can't win through logic or rationality.

                ANY "sexual relations" between an 18+ yr old and a 13 yr old IS RAPE!!!

                A) You claim that this isn't a neocon issue and yet you do what the neocons do; create a moral issue where there is none, and then force your moral views onto other people, and then threaten to kill and torture people who don't live up to your bizarre moral views.

                paints you as stupid.

                Again, not very good logic here.

                Being anally raped by my 40-something father when I was 13 probably had a lot to do with it.

                That is a logical error in reasoning which

                • by tomhudson (43916)

                  You claim that this isn't a neocon issue and yet you do what the neocons do; create a moral issue where there is none, and then force your moral views onto other people, and then threaten to kill and torture people who don't live up to your bizarre moral views.

                  There IS a moral issue when any sex with a minor is concerned.

                  There's the question of consent - is the minor capable of giving informed consent? Do they understand the act of sex and its' consequences, such as STDs and pregnancy?

                  Then there's th

            • by tomhudson (43916)
              The guy was several times her age, he drugged her, then had oral, vaginal, and anal sex (the last when he got worried she might get pregnant if he "lost his load" in her vagina). This wasn't "out of consideration of the victim", this was Nixonish "plausible deniability." Remember, he KNEW beforehand that she was 13, and when he first tried, she said no, several times, and tried to get away from him. It was rape, and it was only the plea bargain that let him cop to a lesser charge. There's no defending wh
          • The fact that you foed me is an indication that you are not interested in intelligent conversation. You are only interested in your own neocon soap box. Your multi-level marketing Web site is a good example of the type of personalities that are attracted to your type of thinking.

            • by RM6f9 (825298)

              If you equate "intelligent conversation" with "child-rapist" (or defender thereof), you've got deeper problems than mine - I will CHEERFULLY foe anyone who is either a child-rapist or a defender of same! I might be depriving myself of conversations with those few individuals who are both intelligent and child-rapists (or defenders of same) - my loss, so be it.

              That you felt you had to reach outside the subject being discussed and pull in a straw-man to justify/bolster your labeling of me says more about you

              • That you felt you had to reach outside the subject being discussed and pull in a straw-man to justify/bolster your labeling of me says more about you than it does about me.

                As I sometimes illustrate; people who dish it out usually can't take it.

                • by tomhudson (43916)

                  Well, you DID make the "false dichotomy" argument with the whole Pinochet thing, and that IS enough to set most peoples' bullshit meters going.

                  Look, just read the transcripts on TSG, and maybe you'll realize that this guy didn't plead to statutory rape - and that in return for the illegal sex charge, he had the other charges dropped. The guy IS a rapist. His on plea bargain testimony makes it clear.

        • by tomhudson (43916)

          Considering that there's no cure for such people, and that they are at the high spectrum in the "risk to re-offend" category, making this a Darwin Award offense might be the charitable thing to do, rather than lifetime incarceration to protect the public.

          Or genetically modify them so that they have totally awful body odor and bad breath, so that the public can at least know who and what they're dealing with (and no, that's not an original idea - it's from a sci-fi short story about 30 years ago).

          Read t

  • Charge: murder by cumulative waste of time.

    When someone distracts enough people for a sufficient amount of time, the loss of time that could be used for otherwise living life exceeds that of a human lifespan. For example, if 300 million Americans spend an hour of their lives considering this waste of time, that's a total of 34224 years wasted.

    That's almost 37 people's entire lives if they live to be 80 years old.

    Fucking kill him now!

  • but we should really focus on unfucking the congo, and for that matter, south africa first. Take the people who support the rape in south africa and put them up against the wall first, sound good?
    • but we should really focus on unfucking the congo, and for that matter, south africa first. Take the people who support the rape in south africa and put them up against the wall first, sound good?

      As to the people, the irrational crowds, the morally righteous mob who label me a "defender of child rapists", I am in favour of this. In fact I've always been against child slavery (sexual and otherwise), and yet the same neocons are often defensive about child slavery since they believe it means they can get cheaper running shoes. It's amazing what type of beliefs people have when you actually talk to them.

      • by tomhudson (43916)

        If we include the practitioners of "female circumcision" as well, I'd be in favour of prosecuting the whole bunch. The "it's not really rape because in our culture all men do it and women expect it" argument is bullshit, same as hitting women was bs 50 years ago. Same as "buying the freedom of slaves for cash" just perpetuates the cycle. You want to sell slaves? Welcome to our new Soviet Russia, where we enslave YOU!

        There's a lot of injustice in the world, but we can't just tell people not to do thei

"There is no distinctly American criminal class except Congress." -- Mark Twain

Working...