... so you would hold some small keyboard in your hand and your other hand could be holding the tablet? Sounds horrible.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
"not for (individual) resale" is just a suggestion, not the law.
Thanks for the info about judges but should you be telling us how to change it instead of how to behave in front of a judge? Do you really want a judge to say someone is guilty because the accused isnt in a suit or doesnt know court procedures. Shouldn't the accused be found guilty based on evidence, not the "cover of the book"
Ive seen some headers that are along the lines of "this post brought to you by file.rar" in many of the groups
Even if false, what does that say about society today if this is even believable.
You just said it in your post, you have to give up interacting with credit agencies.
You are mixing two things up, the ideas of OSS which are superior and the quality of the software at its current state.
yea cause a bomb can be made of money
The parent post is marked informative? Informative like it is easy to tell who is a terrorist by the length of their beard?
Very interesting comment Ragzouken. If a digital good has no resale value or can not be resold, what is it really worth?
I think you are confused. There is more than one group involved here; there are content producers, content owners, content distributers and consumers.
Over time, technology has made things more effiecient. Things like how you make and distribute copyrigted works. Why is it that you demand longer copyright terms when your job has gotten easier?
Is the above comment really insightfull? All of Microsoft is trying to avoid paying corporate taxes, not all people use microsoft products and not all Microsoft customers avoid paying for a license.
But the customer has a choice to not pay those increased costs passed on to them by going to a different compnay.
> What other ideas are out there to keep news journalism profitable?
Why does it have to be profitable?
>> 'Fair use tool' would be security hole. It is naive to expect that it would be used for its intended purpose.
What about copyright's intended purpose? At the termination of the copyright term, how is the public benifiting from this?