Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Ask Slashdot: With grants drying up, how is a tech non profit to survive? 2

Submitted by helios17
helios17 (617082) writes "Non Profits like this have traditionally gotten started from the money grants provide. Most grants award vehicles, computers and even pay for organization rental and utility costs. The problem fledgling and even established non profits are encountering is the dwindling number of grants allowing for Operating or General Support costs. What good is a vehicle received via grant if you can't afford to put fuel in it?

With the number of Operating or General Support grants shrinking and those available funds competed for heavily, should we be looking on line for help? Can efforts like this be a better way to approach it?"

efforts such as this"

Comment: Re:Red Hat = Microsoft (Score 2, Informative) 168

by thomascameron (#26875913) Attached to: Microsoft and Red Hat Team Up On Virtualization
Yeah, sure, cause MSFT does all of their development in the F/OSS community and gives away their technology for free just like RHT does with the Fedora Project. And MSFT has open sourced (or kept open source) all of their acquisitions like RHT did with Sistina (GFS and Cluster Suite), JBoss, Qumranet, Netscape Directory Server, Netscape Security System and others. Oh, and MSFT has paid for legal counsel to testify *against* patents in front of the EU and the US. Yeah, I can see how Red Hat is *just* like Microsoft.

Comment: Re:Take *that* Novell! (Score 4, Insightful) 168

by thomascameron (#26875655) Attached to: Microsoft and Red Hat Team Up On Virtualization
How does this qualify as "neutralizing?" RHT gave up nothing. F/OSS doesn't suffer at all. This is no different from making RHEL work with any other third party closed source technology like Oracle or SAP. RHT and MSFT have simply recognized that there is a need for this interoperability, but RHT basically forced MSFT's hand and MSFT backed down. This is, if anything, a huge victory for F/OSS.

Comment: Re:Et tu, RedHat? (Score 5, Interesting) 168

by thomascameron (#26874959) Attached to: Microsoft and Red Hat Team Up On Virtualization
Read TFA. This agreement contains *none* of the bullshit IP limitations Novell agreed to when they sold out. In this case Red Hat and MSFT are only cooperating from a *technical* standpoint. RHT are not agreeing in any way that Linux owes MSFT any IP rights. This is amazing news and sticks a finger in the eye of Novell's sellout.
Red Hat Software

+ - Red Hat/Microsoft interoperability agreement

Submitted by
thomascameron
thomascameron writes "Red Hat and Microsoft have entered into an interoperability agreement such that each will certify the others OS on their virtualization platform. Conspicuously absent is any sort of patent or open source licensing restrictions or agreements. Also, neither paid the other anything except standard certification/validation testing fees. Looks like that whole Microsoft/Novell claim of requiring patent agreements is vapor.

http://www.redhat.com/promo/svvp/?intcmp=70160000000HiHHAA0"

The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected. -- The Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972

Working...