Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Know what would be really weird? (Score 1) 457

I would be pretty freaked out to see people's faces. Some people have not been blessed in that way and I prefer them on their phone looking away so I can keep my lunch down. I think there are a few genres of social sites based on how a user can use them: user to user or user to group direct communication (akin to talking face to face), broadcast networking (more like terrestrial radio, you send info out and people may tune in), and stalking (whether familial research or otherwise, like a background check that you can do for free on persons of interest based on how and what they have made available) I don't know/care how most people will/do accomplish this, but for me, Google's product line covers all needs, but no one app cuts it.

Comment: Re:Customization (Score 1) 185

by thedrunkensailor (#38825497) Attached to: Chromium-Based Spinoffs Worth Trying
agreed. Chrome is my favorite second browser when my Firefox session needs to be isolated. Also the security holes is chrome OS are significant due to its low customizations and the fact that most users must compile their own release for a full fledged terminal. One well executed exploit could potentially render many machines compromised. If the Os gets it functionality from the web (and chromium gets widely adopted) I still won't use it out of concern for man-in-middle attacks

Comment: constitutionally (Score 1) 543

by thedrunkensailor (#22730240) Attached to: Air Force Cyber Command General Answers Slashdot Questions
constitutionally, the rights for cyber command-type operations are reserved to the states or the people. so if you want to hack a known bad site, you would be required to comply with state law, but the interesting thing would arise from this: if it wasn't the federal govt's job to do this cyber-protectionism (which the constitution clearly states is not the role of the federal govt) then who would prosecute someone for hacking a known bad site? imagine this scenario: i hack a terrorist message board and bring it down permanently someone from the terrorist organization hires a lawyer and presses charges against me in my home state i choose to have a jury at my trial now rather than it being a federal responsibility to say "he hacked something he will go to jail regardless of motivation or the facts" my fate lies in the hands of a jury of peers, who after examining my motives (it was a terrorist group, not protected by the first amendment) and the harm done (terrorists become unable to pass information at the same level of ease) they can choose whether i was breaking law or taking it into my own hands. in order for the system i am speaking of to function successfully, a fundamental change in what the role of government IS would be necessary. if we want to be strung along and victim to the DMCA provisions, then we dont have to do a damn thing. if we want real change and freedom we are required to take back the inalienable rights that the DMCA has alienated. when the govt is looking out for us we all lose, i know plenty of people who could for less money do more than what the vague answers of general lord imply that can be done.

+ - Return of the Static Universe

Submitted by Dr. Eggman
Dr. Eggman (932300) writes "According to an article on ars technica and its accompanying General Relativity and Gravitation journal article The return of a static universe and the end of cosmology, in the far future of the universe, all evidence of the origin of the universe will be gone. Intelligences alive 100-billion-years from now will observe a universe that appears much the way our early 1900s view of the universe was: Static, had always been there, and consisted of little more than our own galaxy and a islands of matter."

+ - Deathbed confession swears by Roswell aliens->

Submitted by
hellbreaker writes "Lieutenant Walter Haut, the public relations officer at Roswell base in 1947, died last year; but he left behind a sworn affidavit (to be opened in the event of his death) describing a spacecraft, and little green men that he himself witnessed. Okay, maybe not green, but this just brings the whole question back: what exactly happened there?"
Link to Original Source
It's funny.  Laugh.

+ - Flash game illustrates BSA anti-piracy thinking

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "The Turkish branch of the BSA is promoting a somewhat bizarre Flash game titled 'Korsanavcisi' ("Piratehunter") where you guide a BSA agent in suit and sunglasses around a maze and smack software pirates carrying sacks filled with illegal CDs with a "Copyright and Royalties Law" book. Upon being smacked with "the Law", the pirates become immobilized and turn into sheepish looking but legal software users. But beware — any pirates left on the loose can turn "cured" software users back into software pirates on contact. You must thus hunt down every last pirate within a set time limit to advance to the next stage, brave Piratehunter! Arrowkeys move the agent around the maze. Space brings copyright law down on the Pirates."

To downgrade the human mind is bad theology. - C. K. Chesterton